User talk:Rugby madmun

Welcome Rugby madmun! Now that you've joined Wikipedia, there are registered editors!

Hello, Rugby madmun. Welcome to Wikipedia! I'm S0091, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.

Remember to always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes   at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to this (your talk) page, and a timestamp.

 Sincerely, S0091 (talk) 23:35, 2 April 2019 (UTC)  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:S0091&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:WelcomeVisual/user-talk_preload (Leave me a message)]

Proposed deletion of Ben Cambriani


The article Ben Cambriani has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Wgolf (talk) 00:01, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Aneurin Owen (rugby union)


The article Aneurin Owen (rugby union) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Wgolf (talk) 00:20, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

April 2019
Hello, I'm Dl2000. I noticed that you recently removed content from Ospreys (rugby union) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Dl2000 (talk) 00:35, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

Ben Cambriani moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Ben Cambriani, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. And could we at least have a decent lead? Sam Sailor 05:34, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

Tomi Lewis moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Tomi Lewis, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 05:44, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 29
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sale Sharks, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert du Preez ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Sale_Sharks check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Sale_Sharks?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:48, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

Community Insights Survey
Share your experience in this survey

Hi ,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. [mailto:surveys@wikimedia.org Email us] if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely, RMaung (WMF) 16:28, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey
Share your experience in this survey

Hi ,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. [mailto:surveys@wikimedia.org Email us] if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely, RMaung (WMF) 15:36, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey
Share your experience in this survey

Hi ,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. [mailto:surveys@wikimedia.org Email us] if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely, RMaung (WMF) 20:38, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 16
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wales national rugby union team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Six Nations ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Wales_national_rugby_union_team check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Wales_national_rugby_union_team?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Aneurin Owen (rugby union)


Hello, Rugby madmun. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Aneurin Owen".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 22:42, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

March 2020
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Zarah Sultana, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 20:28, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

April 2020
Hi, you keep removing players that haves sources on List of 2020–21 Pro14 transfers without any explanation, as you have done here, here, here, here and here. You seem to be of the opinion that players who have been promoted from a club's academy to that same club's senior squad should not be included. however, if that is your opinion, you should seek a consensus either on the articles talk page here, or perhaps on the WikiProject rugby union talk page here, rather than making a unilateral decision with no explanation that goes against the current accepted criteria for the page. Unless you can achieve a consensus with other contributors, I will continue to undo your unexplained removals and treat them as vandalism if necessary. MunsterFan2011 (talk) 10:52, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi mate . No need to get angsty about all of this, we're on a transfers page for Pro14 clubs. You have directed me to contributor pages, which I was previously unaware of, so in future will try to reference it, but again, it isn't that deep, mate. Furthermore, I have cited reputable sourcing for the addition. Hope this helps, it's not meant as a slight to anyone - especially you - just thought I'd look after my teams transfers. Best
 * Hi You haven't explained why you are removing perfectly acceptable additions to the article, which have sources backing them up. Until you can explain why you are doing this, a feel I have little choice but to treat your unexplained removals as vandalism, as I said before. Brushing this off as "no need to get angsty" does not help your case. MunsterFan2011 (talk) 09:38, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
 * As to my previous message, chill out. We're editing A TRANSFERS PAGE FOR THE PRO14, which I imagine only the most devout followers will ever visit, I hardly believe any of these viewers will be getting as worked up about whether Rio Dyer was signed from the academy or not. I removed them as these players have been present in the Dragons starting line ups for the past 2 seasons, are also already included on the Dragons squad on their wikipedia page, it's hardly news that they're now members of the Dragons squad on professional contracts is it? I really hope that you're under the age of 12 years old to care so deeply about something as trivial as all of this. Have a great week.
 * Again, you are completely missing the point. Just because you deem this page to be trivial, that does not mean Wikipedia does. Are you new here? There are policies and guidelines that must adhered to. This ensures the validity of the information we are presenting. By removing sourced information, you are in breach of those policies. If you can't adhere to them and follow process like everyone else, this is not the site for you. If you believe players who are in a clubs academy and have been promoted to that clubs senior squad do not constitute transfers and, therefore, should not be on this article, you need to seek a consensus to support that opinion; this is how Wikipedia works. If you refuse to do that, I have little choice but to continue to treat your reverting as vandalism and, if necessary, report you to an administrator, in which case you could find yourself blocked. I have already explained to you how you can seek a consensus. I am more than happy to help you further if needs be, but I would advise you to not tell people to "chill out" or say things such as "I really hope that you're under the age of 12", as this will not help your case at all. Also, please end your message by using four tildes, as required by Signatures. MunsterFan2011 (talk) 18:52, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

April 2020
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to List of 2020–21 Pro14 transfers. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. MunsterFan2011 (talk) 09:40, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

June 2020
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Christian Pulisic, you may be blocked from editing. Mattythewhite (talk) 00:55, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

What was disruptive about updating his statistics from today's game? There was no 'disruptive editing'. Mattythewhite
 * Because you added statistics that were incorrect: they were already up to date as of yesterday's game. Mattythewhite (talk) 16:28, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

November 2022
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Wayne Pivac. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Schazjmd  (talk)  21:04, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Avoiding links to disambiguation pages
Please take care not to link to disambiguation pages as you did in this edit: check that all your links go to the page you intended.

There is an easy way to avoid linking to disambiguation pages: if you go to "Preferences", "Gadgets", and look under "Appearance" you'll see "Display links to disambiguation pages in orange" towards the bottom of the section. Select that tickbox, and whenever you Preview a page you'll be able to see whether you've accidentally linked to a disambiguation page. Thanks, and Happy Editing. Pam D  19:20, 8 May 2024 (UTC)