User talk:RuleBritannia1879

November 2023
Hello, I'm Knitsey. I noticed that you recently removed content from Britain First without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Knitsey (talk) 21:34, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Britain First, you may be blocked from editing. — Czello (music) 15:43, 30 November 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Britain First. — Czello (music) 16:07, 30 November 2023 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:18, 30 November 2023 (UTC)

Britain First
Hi, RuleBritannia1879. I notice that you have been editing the article Britain First in a tendentious way, in particular by removing reliable sources, and it does not look like you're taking in what you're being told by experienced editors, for example here. I say that because I see you still arguing about what the party call themselves here, which, as you have been told, is irrelevant. Please don't edit the article in such a way again, or you are likely to be blocked from it. Bishonen &#124; tålk 16:14, 30 November 2023 (UTC).

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Daniel Case (talk) 19:23, 30 November 2023 (UTC)