User talk:RuleBrittania

Fair use rationale for Image:MedalertCar.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:MedalertCar.jpg. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 19:11, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

North Korea
Inserting your own POV into articles and then calling people who disagree with you Right Wing will accomplish nothing. Your additions to that article are speculation, which is not encyclopedic. Furthermore, you claim on your own userpage that you hate Wikipedia, so why are you here? TheQuandry 19:25, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

North Korea edits
If you believe that an article is biased, please contribute to improving it with sourced, verifiable information, not with editorializing. You may or may not be the same as another user, but your edits are very similar, both in content and in style (e.g. adding pro-NK and anti-American editorializing to articles, and extreme comma splices) to User:NoJoyInMudville. --Reuben 21:02, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Unprotection
I have no idea when, and am not sure what MONGO will want to do (and incidentally, I'm sure he already knows about AGF). Trebor 18:55, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Provide a diff, or contact the Administrators' noticeboard. -- ReyBrujo 21:08, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of MedAlert


A tag has been placed on MedAlert requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Natureium (talk) 18:10, 3 January 2019 (UTC)