User talk:Rumkeswani

A tag has been placed on Intrapoint, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Calton | Talk 14:48, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

Simple: like the tag says, ''It is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article. (See WP:CSD) --Calton | Talk 15:20, 7 September 2007 (UTC)


 * It's hard to believe your assertion about you not meaning this to be an advert, considering it's constructed entirely of ad copy lifted directly from their web site, such as here Calton | Talk 15:59, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Intrapoint requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -FisherQueen (Talk) 15:56, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

Intrapoint
To sum up: This article is a copyright violation of an advertisement for a company that does not appear to meet the notability guidelines, written by a user with a probable conflict of interest. That is four separate but valid reasons not to recreate the article. -FisherQueen (Talk) 16:01, 7 September 2007 (UTC)