User talk:Run n Fly

Welcome!
Hi Run n Fly! I noticed your contributions to Viral vector vaccine&#32;and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! PrisonerB (talk) 13:40, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ratna Ghoshal has been accepted
 Ratna Ghoshal, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Ratna_Ghoshal help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! CommanderWaterford (talk) 07:46, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ambarish Bhattacharya has been accepted
 Ambarish Bhattacharya, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Ambarish_Bhattacharya help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! CommanderWaterford (talk) 12:00, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

May 2021 at Women in Red
--Rosiestep (talk) 21:37, 28 April 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

What is your problem?
Don't add any new discussion to existing discussion. That discussion is closed. Nitesh003 (talk) 17:39, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
 * , I have addressed the solutions to your problem at your talk page. Run n Fly (talk) 17:43, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

"Indian variant" term discussion
Hi, further to your comment on my talk page, just to let you know I am suggesting a discussion on this here.--A bit iffy (talk) 12:17, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

Jmmeisner
Run n Fly, please be aware that an editor with a disclosed conflict of interest is welcome to make talk page edit requests, and to revert obvious vandalism, threats, personal attacks and the like. Cullen328  Let's discuss it  20:38, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
 * also, per WP:OUTING, do not post someone's place of employment to Wikipedia, unless they have explicitly done so themselves. Correct me if I am wrong, but I do not see that hey have done that. --- Possibly (talk) 21:12, 12 May 2021 (UTC)


 * , sorry for posting those information. Can anyone of you also remove/redact the same details posted here at User_talk:Jmmeisner Run n Fly (talk) 21:38, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
 * In my experience at COIN it is fine to say "when I google the user's username, I come up with an indication of a COI", as long as you are sure and are not casting aspersions without good reasons. However it's not OK to say X user works at Y employer unless they have explicitly already revealed that. Thanks. --- Possibly (talk) 21:42, 12 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Ok. Will not post things per WP:OUTING Run n Fly (talk) 21:46, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

Notice of Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents discussion
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Run n Fly have are connected with Khorkuto serial. Thank you.  Heart  (talk) 11:01, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Hey, consider helping out with this proposal!
Hey, I noticed your edit on Government of NCT of Delhi v. Union of India. Please check this out and express support if interested. Semanticz0 (talk) 18:43, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

Non-admin closures
Hi, please, see Non-admin closures and in particular, WP:BADNAC. I would suggest you refrain from closing AfDs while you become familiar with the process. Thank you. MarioGom (talk) 06:22, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

Khorkuto
Hi, please keep WP:3RR in mind at Khorkuto. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:31, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
 * , the IP editors are adding all the cast in lead section which is not required and duplicates information per MOS:LEAD. I have explained clearly why I removed but the IP editors seems to ignore the reasons behind them. Thank you Run n Fly (talk) 18:34, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
 * I have semi-protected the page for a month to prevent it from happening again, but please do keep in mind that this isn't vandalism, and thus not exempt from WP:3RR. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:35, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
 * , OK will report to proper venue if I encounter such editing here after warning and discussions and avoid WP:3RR Run n Fly (talk) 18:39, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

3RR at ZyCoV-D
You have breached WP:3RR, a policy you're already aware of diff, at ZyCoV-D, reverting five times within 24 hours and 16 minutes. Take care. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk!  11:58, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
 * , Its only 2 times. Where did you find the other 3 times. Please help me to identify. Thank you. Run n Fly (talk) 12:02, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Please do not put false accusations. Run n Fly (talk) 12:05, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
 * 1, 2, 3, 4. An edit or a series of consecutive edits that undoes other editors' actions—whether in whole or in part—counts as a revert.


 * ~ ToBeFree (talk) 12:10, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
 * (Please note that "violating 3RR" is not a valid reason to revert an edit; the only two possible approaches to such a situation are disengaging or discussing on the article's talk page, but not reverting again. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 12:12, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

Regards, Joshua Jonathan  - Let's talk!  12:12, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
 * diff
 * diff
 * diff
 * diff
 * diff
 * Thank you for the identifying them. But I feel its totally incorrect as I along with were resolving serious issue with User:Shinjoya at Talk:ZyCoV-D. See the WP:ANI report.
 * Also, I am the person who is actively engaged in maintain WP:COVID-19 articles be it editing, protecting or creating. But I am given a notice of WP:DS so I will not be taking part in them any more. Run n Fly (talk) 12:22, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
 * If it had been a huge, ongoing problem, there would have been a block instead of a warning, so no worries. I just wanted to point out that, technically, by a few minutes, this was indeed a violation of WP:3RR.
 * The DS notice was unnecessary; I've now seen that you're already aware, as you have issued the same template recently. I have collapsed the unnecessary notification. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 12:27, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
 * , but useful information of "Technology" section is gone now. If a single reader feels "dubious info" and removes data single-handedly from article does that apply to all of us? I think no so. Also replies Have been here longer than you are. Please go a bit slow, see  which is clear violation of WP:SENIORITY. Such behavior should be stopped. Thank you. Run n Fly (talk) 12:34, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Well, the relevant policy in such cases is WP:ONUS: The content can only be re-added if a consensus for inclusion is found. An RFC could be the way to achieve such consensus. Selectively messaging/pinging specific users doesn't work the same way, as people are likely to invite others with the same opinion. An RFC is neutrally advertised to many random users with many different opinions instead. Regarding the "seniority" issue, I was a bit disappointed to read this from, as it's rather incivil to use someone's account age as an argument. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 12:46, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Can I notify WP:COVID-19 and WP:Medicine about the on-going discussion at Talk:ZyCoV-D for a participation without tagging anyone? A neutral request. I hope its allowed. Run n Fly (talk) 12:50, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
 * forgot to add Re Run n Fly (talk) 12:50, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
 * I was about to say yes, but you already did so. Face-smile.svg ~ ToBeFree (talk) 13:02, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
 * , again WP:INCIVIL comments about the editors as a whole who contributed at the vaccine pages in comments at Talk:ZyCoV-D by . See says they are drafted in an encyclopedic language without wanting to come off as pop-science books written to interest grade-fivers.. Should we continue allow this? Run n Fly (talk) 13:26, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
 * That statement seems to be about the possible audience of the article, not about the Wikipedia editors who wrote it. The "one down" guideline section specifically refers to secondary, undergraduate and postgraduate education, and "grade-fivers" are an example for early secondary students, or pars pro toto for secondary education in general. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 13:35, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
 * That statement seems to be about the possible audience of the article, not about the Wikipedia editors who wrote it. The "one down" guideline section specifically refers to secondary, undergraduate and postgraduate education, and "grade-fivers" are an example for early secondary students, or pars pro toto for secondary education in general. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 13:35, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

FYI
For clear-cut violations of username policy like this one, please report them directly to WP:UAA noticeboard instead of warning. -- Ashley yoursmile!  06:40, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

July 2021

 * TheresNoTime - When you're available, can you email me or PM me in IRC or Discord? I'd like to get more information about this block and what you saw with the technical evidence you retrieved. Thanks man! :-)  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   04:29, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi and, I was aware about this clean start, as have been at least one other checkuser and , the administrator who arguably caused the clean start to happen. I was also relatively strict regarding this  and kept an eye on the situation . The block isn't entirely surprising, as maintaining a proper clean start is tough. If there are non-public details that can at least be shared with administrators, I'd like to receive a copy. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 10:41, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
 * (or, if the only non-public thing here is the now-public connection between Amkgp and Run n Fly, please remove the checkuser template from the block, publicly provide the remaining evidence of disruption and open this up for a normal block review.) ~ ToBeFree (talk) 10:51, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
 * , User:Amkgp was closed with a notice retired last logged on 10 March 2021 17:34 UTC. A month later I thought of creating pages of well known film and TV personality like of the show Khorkuto which passes WP:ENT and WP:GNG. Later, I was encouraged on coverage of Indian women, including Bengalis through WikiGap Kolkata. See the article in The Indian Express through WP:WOMRED. See this
 * I created and started editing from this account on 6 April 2021 at 10:30 UTC. I have followed the instructions stated at How to "clean start in WP:CLEANSTART. Thank you. Run n Fly (talk) 11:06, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
 * there are some additional elements that the above now-public connection, which I can't share on-wiki, but in absence of being able to get in touch with you prior to responding, I would suggest reviewing this and my below questions.
 * I will however state that regardless of a clean start (which itself states "Changing accounts to avoid the consequences of past bad behaviors is usually seen as evading scrutiny"), you have also engaged in some actions which clearly indicate you are evading scrutiny. So let me ask you this, plainly - have you been accidently editing logged out recently? If we can have an honest discussion, then perhaps this can be kicked back to a normal unblock review. - TheresNoTime 😺 11:19, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
 * , Yes once for submission of Ambarish Bhattacharya via WP:AFC but that was before the creation of new account (but that time I was not sure whether I should join back, and I had already declared that I have created a new account and will contribute from this account when tried to seek help from editor and admin. See the proof here). I found that IP editing has a lot of limitations, so started an account with WP:CLEANSTART and continuing till today. Run n Fly (talk) 11:35, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Since the account created I have not edited logged out. Run n Fly (talk) 11:47, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Are you absolutely sure? No Articles for deletion votes or anything? I personally think the better outcome in most blocks is that the editor can return to constructively contributing, and I'd really prefer to be able to hand this back over for a normal block appeal. I won't do that until I'm sure you're being honest with us (and thus, will be honest in a block appeal). - TheresNoTime 😺 11:53, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
 * , Yes, recently I only participated in Articles for deletion/Shree Krishna Bhakto Meera. There you can see I have voted and engaged in a constructive discussion from this account only. Are you suspecting the keep vote from the IP editor from me? I can say clearly that I have not voted that logged out. Thank you. Run n Fly (talk) 12:02, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
 * I have nothing to do Shree Krishna Bhakto Meera. I worked to make it WP:NTV thats why I participated from this account only. Its upto the community to decide whether to keep, delete or draftify. Run n Fly (talk) 12:05, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
 * It's from the same IP range you use when you do your routine log-out commenting in the Wikipedia namespace. It's also the same range you used when you used to complain about backlogs shortly after filing requests at RFPP and it's the same range you used when complaining about backlogs shortly after filing permission request at PERM. And after the behaviour you exhibited when you were still Amkgp, trust in your explanations is running in negative figures right now. Nick (talk) 12:40, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
 * , I have not contributed a single thing that makes anything negative from or break Wikipedia policies. Why the account  is dragged into this when reviewing  and create WP:DRAMA. I already have disconnected in all respects from  and made a clean start. I would request you all to please consider my request as I have answered all your queries. Also I never used  to report backlog of RfPP or PERM at WP:ANI while logged out. I use mobile internet that is not static but dynamic in nature. Some other person may also be allotted the IP range when disconnected. Thank you. Run n Fly (talk) 13:05, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
 * I noticed your clean start within the first couple days and turned a mostly blind eye to it because I hoped you would be able to contribute constructively, though the clean start was arguably borderline illegitimate in the first place (the AN thread was quite the cloud to resign under, compounded by the fact that you then continued to edit projectspace, including AfD's for articles you created as Amkgp, as an IP, which only ended when I called you out on it). Your clean start was also not truly clean; there are 70 instances of overlap between your old and your new account (and for what it's worth, you also continued violating copyright as Run n Fly, albeit on Commons). That alone would have been justification to file an SPI, and it would not have been unreasonable for an administrator to block you for evading scrutiny. I didn't, and I kept my mouth shut about it, aside from privately pointing out the clean start to some previously involved parties.You were given a substantial amount of rope, and you used it to rappel right down the chasm that got you blocked last time. The logged out socking is, as Nick points out, essentially proven (with or without CU evidence), and your denial is disheartening. When Tony blocked you for logged-out editing, you stated that you again went through all the points of WP:PROJSOCK policy and found where I was doing wrong and I promise that this will never ever occur next time. There is no way that !vote wasn't you, and there is no way it was inadvertent. The only path towards an unblock that I see is to wait for some time and then appeal as Amkgp, without any further socking in the meantime. --Blablubbs (talk) 13:23, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
 * ,, and , I was upset and scrambled my password and delinked my e-mail. I do not remember the password of Amkgp. I also don't want to connect to the past account anymore. You can permanently block . Run n Fly (talk) 13:30, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
 * I have not engaged in any socking after I recognized the policy from (Run n Fly). Regarding commons I was unsure whether scanning is allowed or not. That I also rectified. Its looks like its going to more WP:DRAMA. I have never ever edited logged-out from . It looks the discussion is going somewhere other. Run n Fly (talk) 13:37, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
 * I request with folded hands that I have not edited logged out anytime via . Please help to come to a conclusion. I don't want to get associated with mistakes of . It is creating problems for me. Continuous allegation based on Amkgp to attack contributions of Run n Fly when I have clear and honest intention of continuing per WP:CLEANSTART. Thank you. Run n Fly (talk) 13:42, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
 * I request with folded hands that I have not edited logged out anytime via . Please help to come to a conclusion. I don't want to get associated with mistakes of . It is creating problems for me. Continuous allegation based on Amkgp to attack contributions of Run n Fly when I have clear and honest intention of continuing per WP:CLEANSTART. Thank you. Run n Fly (talk) 13:42, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

Sigh. I came across this on accident by following up on one of my past cases. I can confirm that you've edited logged out in violation of policy without commenting on any given IP or range. They underlying IP ranges here are extremely busy so I can't tell how much you've done so, but there's at least one recent example of IP socking in project space in violation of policy that was clearly you and not an accident, plus multiple other logged out edits that I ordinarily wouldn't care about in mainspace and some project boards, but are worth noting since you claimed never to have edited logged out. It's also worth noting that editing logged out in project space was what got you blocked the last time (by me) and where you stated that you would not do it again. That's entirely seperate from the question of whether or not this is a valid clean start (I don't think it is as you quit while you were under discussion at a noticeboard, but that's a different discussion.)Anyway, I'm not going to decline the unblock since TNT and Oshwah were already discussing this, but I have no problem confirming that you are not telling the truth about your logged out editing, and that it was intentional and not just a mistake in at least one instance. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:56, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
 * , I have never edited logged out since I created this account. Those you mention were from (Amkgp). I am telling the truth. I have no interest to speak lies here. I have done mistake and violations from past account that why I made a clean start. Run n Fly (talk) 04:39, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
 * That's not true. You have edited logged out within the last month in a way where you would have known it to be a violation of policy. I can say this very confidently. Like I said above, I am not able to comment on any specific IP address publicly and I am not going to do so, but I can say that your claim to not have edited logged out since the creation of this account is false with a high degree of confidence. TonyBallioni (talk) 04:44, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
 * All the complaints made are from (Amkgp) which I have already dis-associated myself. I have never edited anywhere logged out from (Run n Fly). I not saying any lies. I have not done any of my editing from (Run n Fly) that is being said. What more can I say, everybody seems to judge from based on (Amkgp) activities which I have never attempted from (Run n Fly). I am not commenting any more and leave to you all to take the call. Thank you Run n Fly (talk) 04:53, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
 * This will be my last comment unless another CU or admin pings me:
 * You are the same person as Amkgp, as you have already admitted. I'm not sure if you meant to do this, but the way you keep using both names can come off like you're saying that you are different people. I just want to note this point for anyone else following at home.
 * WP:CLEANSTART says If you attempt a clean start but are recognized, you will be held accountable for your actions under both the old and new accounts. So trying to bifurcate your conduct between the two accounts is actually the exact opposite of what the policy you're appealing to says will happen if its discovered that you made a clean start. Your actions under both usernames are supposed to be taken into account when someone is reviewing the unblock.
 * It is my opinion as an uninvolved CheckUser that you have logged out in violation of policy since abandoning your former account and while editing from the Run n Fly account. I've sent Oshwah and TNT what link I was able to draw technically via email. They are independent of me (and I am independent of them) and they can draw their own conclusions. I was not the blocking admin/CU here, but I was able to find evidence that contradicted the claims you made in this unblock without going through all the ranges that you edit from.
 * Like I mentioned: I won't be reviewing this since Oshwah and ToBeFree were already talking with TNT. What I am saying is that as an uninvolved CheckUser, it is my opinion that the claims you are making in this unblock discussion are not true. I've provided other CUs (both the blocking CU and another one who commented here) the relevant technical details. I'm happy to leave this to their and ToBeFree's discussion, but that discussion should take place with all the relevant facts being known. One of those relevant facts is that you are continuing to make claims that technical evidence shows is unlikely to be true. TonyBallioni (talk) 05:26, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
 * I had said I wont comment, but I have somethings to say:
 * First of all, I never edited logged out after WP:CLEANSTART. If I would done so I would have accepted it. But forcefully making someone to accept it when not committed is totally unfair.
 * I use mobile internet to access Wikpedia, and the ISPs generally allocate dynamic IPs, thus the IP may have been allocated to someone else, and I am 100% confident about it since I have switched on-and-off my mobile phone many a times and each time they have allocated a new IP address. I have checked my claims through (https://whois-referral.toolforge.org/gateway.py)
 * Is the CheckUser results 100% accurate? I have encountered a case that shows No. Also, technical evidence have been ignored earlier for various reasons. For e.g. see Sockpuppet investigations/Walrus Ji/Archive where it is said and concluded
 * And here I have declared that I don't posses the password of (Amkgp). I have never abused or cause damage to the project but rather helped in every possible way. I leave to the CUs and admins to decide whether to accept or decline the request. Hope I will get justice. Thank you. Run n Fly (talk) 11:18, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
 * And here I have declared that I don't posses the password of (Amkgp). I have never abused or cause damage to the project but rather helped in every possible way. I leave to the CUs and admins to decide whether to accept or decline the request. Hope I will get justice. Thank you. Run n Fly (talk) 11:18, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
 * And here I have declared that I don't posses the password of (Amkgp). I have never abused or cause damage to the project but rather helped in every possible way. I leave to the CUs and admins to decide whether to accept or decline the request. Hope I will get justice. Thank you. Run n Fly (talk) 11:18, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

Just noting that given the above, I will not be stepping this down from a CheckUser block. Please review the block appeal process - TheresNoTime 😺 19:31, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

Help to make the change
I request any editor in good faith to replace the July 2021 with 26 July 2021 in the lead section and  at Infobox television in Shree Krishna Bhakto Meera, as the dates has been announced. Thank you. Run n Fly (talk) 20:42, 19 July 2021 (UTC)


 * per WP:PROXYING. --Blablubbs (talk) 21:09, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
 * but WP:PROXYING also mentions clearly are permitted and I have provided WP:RS that verifies the claim and in good faith. Anyways, I accept the decline. Thank you. Run n Fly (talk) 21:18, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
 * And what independent reason would Blablubbs have had for making that edit ? Nick (talk) 21:46, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

AfD closure request
I would like to request any admin to help in closing an Old Afd discussion Articles for deletion/Shree Krishna Bhakto Meera. I would also like to draw/update a fact that the draftify option is now not applicable as the dates of the show is announced and will start from 26 July 2021. I am not subject to WP:COI nor WP:UPE, but I worked a lot to improve the article and participated in the AfD. Taking this, I am making the request. Thank you. Run n Fly (talk) 20:53, 19 July 2021 (UTC)


 * ❌ per WP:PROXYING. Do this once more and I will remove your talk page access. Nick (talk) 21:12, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Shree Krishna Bhakto Meera.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Shree Krishna Bhakto Meera.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:07, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

August Editathons with Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:27, 23 July 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Nomination of Rajanya Mitra for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rajanya Mitra is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Rajanya Mitra until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bapinghosh (talk) 19:01, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Pandab Goenda (TV series) poster.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Pandab Goenda (TV series) poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:04, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Vial of covaxin.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Vial of covaxin.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the file description page and add the text  below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing   with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:18, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Convidecia vial.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Convidecia vial.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:10, 1 December 2021 (UTC)

January 2022 Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:03, 28 December 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

February with Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:10, 31 January 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Orphaned non-free image File:Convidecia logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:Convidecia logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:09, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Sannyasi Deshonayok (poster).jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Sannyasi Deshonayok (poster).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:54, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Roilo Pherar Nimontron poster.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Roilo Pherar Nimontron poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:23, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Sokhi.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Sokhi.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:27, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Bou Kotha Kao (TV serial) poster.png
Thanks for uploading File:Bou Kotha Kao (TV serial) poster.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:12, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Medrxiv
Template:Medrxiv has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 06:26, 20 June 2024 (UTC)