User talk:Rundome

July 2011
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Julia Montes, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. &Dagger; M A HE W A &Dagger;  &bull;   talk  04:01, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
 * Also possible sockpuppet account. 99.168.84.75 (talk) 04:08, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to Kathryn Bernardo. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -WayKurat (talk) 13:32, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Kiray, you will be blocked from editing without further notice. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Kiray was changed by Rundome (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.962752 on 2011-07-12T12:32:52+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:32, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. 12:43, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning; the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You have repeatedly been told about adding unsourced content, but you continue to do so, as in your recent edits at Maja Salvador, Rhian Ramos and Kiray. In addition, your recent edit to Hopia Legaspi looked like vandalism. If it wasn't, then in future please explain your edits in edit summaries to avoid giving the impression of vandalism. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:54, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

July 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Rhian Ramos, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Rhian Ramos was changed by Rundome (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.903028 on 2011-07-28T12:48:13+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:48, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for continuing to add questionable statements about people which are unsourced or sourced only to rumours in blogs, forums, etc, despite warnings. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:12, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

December 2011
This is the only warning you will receive. Your recent vandalism, as you did to Julia Montes, will not be tolerated. Although vandalizing articles on occasions that are days or weeks apart from each other sometimes prevents editors from being blocked, your continued vandalism constitutes a long term pattern of abuse. The next time you vandalize a page, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia without further notice. -WayKurat (talk) 14:34, 3 December 2011 (UTC)