User talk:Runendlessly

Wikipedia
Your page Livejournal mindmap is nominated for speedy deletion due to its first-person writing and character of original research, rather than information of documented fact. Please refer to Wikipedia guidelines on the writing of articles. Djcartwright 04:57, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles that you have created yourself. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please place on the page and make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Ryūlóng 07:49, 1 October 2006 (UTC)


 * I did not intend to remove said tags. It happened while I was updating simultaneous pages.I will eat you alive www.livejournal.com/users/realityvortex 18:48, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

Please do not alter the deletion template so that no reason is shown or use a hangon and then put the reason on the article. Ryūlóng 07:53, 1 October 2006 (UTC)


 * I do intend to give reasons.I will eat you alive www.livejournal.com/users/realityvortex 18:48, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Do so on the talk pages, then. Ryūlóng 07:54, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
 * direct me to said talk pages, then.I will eat you alive www.livejournal.com/users/realityvortex 18:48, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Go to the articles (if they haven't been deleted yet) and click on "Discussion". There, you can make your case as to why the articles should not be deleted, after you place on the article's page. Then, an admin will come along and see your reasoning. Ryūlóng 07:58, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

Hi. Seems that a lot of what you're adding is content from. I'm sure you mean well given the care with which you're laying these out, but it's a violation of copyright. You can write about the subject in your own words. - Lucky 6.9 08:09, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I cite everything I take. I'm not violating any copyright. And I do write in my own words thank you.all my articles are now gone. the reason? violation of copyright they said. They didn't even mention is as the thread was being deleted. all they said was this: The given reason is: it is an article about a band, singer, musician, or musical ensemble that does not assert the importance or significance of the subject. Which is BS, because I clearly did. And I cited whatever I took. I'm not dumb. They seem to think I am. And they don't give me any answers.I will eat you alive www.livejournal.com/users/realityvortex 18:48, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

I saw your comment at LJ
I hope you don't mind, but I'd rather answer here. I've read over the deleted Cloud cult article, and it does appear to be a copyright violation. You can't lift someone else's words and drop them straight into a Wikipedia article, even if you do cite the source. The information needs to be re-written in your own words. I'm seeing many many phrases that come directly from the Cloud Cult website. It's certainly ok to quote a short passage from a source, but the bulk of the article actually was written by the website author.

The problem with the LiveJournal Mindmap article is that most of it appears to be what Wikipedia refers to as "original research." By that, I mean that the bulk of the article consists of things that people have written in their blogs. You might read over the page about original research to get an idea of what I'm talking about. Joyous! | Talk 15:23, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
 * This is just confusing. Especially the NO ORIGINAL RESEARCH thing wikipedia's got going on. Care to explain?

A slightly belated welcome
It looks like you didn't get our standard "welcome" greeting. Well, here you go:

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style


 * It's good to see a new editor with enthusiasm. Please look through the links in the greeting above. You will probably find lots of useful information about what we're looking for in new articles. And of course, feel free to ask anyone for help. I'm sorry you seem to have gotten off to a rocky start--I hope you continue editing.  Joyous! | Talk 17:04, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Thank you again! Man, I've been working on this stuff all night! I have been scouring wikipedia dn have come across this once. Now I should read it again, more fully. Now, I can finally get published!I will eat you alive www.livejournal.com/users/realityvortex 18:48, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

Livejournal mindmap
Please review No original research. Your article does not meet our standards. Owen&times; &#9742;  18:37, 1 October 2006 (UTC) That's bullshit. All my reasearch was original. I will eat you alive www.livejournal.com/users/realityvortex 18:48, 1 October 2006 (UTC) "All my research was original" -- exactly. The No original research policy say just that: no original research. --jpgordon&#8711;&#8710;&#8711;&#8710; 18:54, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I don't know what to do with livejournal mindmapI will eat you alive www.livejournal.com/users/realityvortex 05:11, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

Entry
If you want to contact me about an entry, or any other editor, just put it on my talk page instead of asking where you can ask me about it. If it's about "Livejournal mindmap", though, don't bother. Djcartwright 19:40, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
 * There's Cloud Cult one, well three, but they've all been deleted either for original research or copyright violation. Except one. I'll post it if you ask me.I will eat you alive      www.livejournal.com/users/realityvortex 05:12, 2 October 2006 (UTC)


 * No thanks. I really don't want anything to do with an original research or copyright-infringing article. Djcartwright 07:50, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

Signature
By the way, I would recommend that you trim your signature to something manageable. That's just absurd. Djcartwright 01:24, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
 * i see no reason to change shape to fitI will eat you alive www.livejournal.com/users/realityvortex 10:08, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Cluck1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Cluck1.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 09:05, 8 October 2006 (UTC)


 * done I will eat you alive www.livejournal.com/users/realityvortex 10:08, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

Regarding edits to Diane Cluck
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, Runendlessly! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule invisionfree\.com, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links policy for more information. If the link was to an image, please read Wikipedia's image tutorial on how to use a more appropriate method to insert the image into an article. If your link was intended to promote a site you own, are affiliated with, or will make money from inclusion in Wikipedia, please note that inserting spam into Wikipedia is against policy. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 10:15, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Cluck1.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Cluck1.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:12, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Cluck2.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Cluck2.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 12:34, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Cluck3.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Cluck3.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 12:34, 22 June 2016 (UTC)