User talk:Runewiki777/Archive 2

RfA voting
Lately, I have seen that you've been citing edit count after supporting/opposing an editor. I hope you do realize that we do not promote editors on their edit count; we promote them on the work they have done on Wikipedia, and whether or not we think they are trustworthy enough for the adminship tools. Anyway, I hope that if you were using editcount as a reason, you will now look at the merits of the user. Remember, quality > quantity. Thanks, Nishkid64 (talk) 20:58, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
 * P.S. I am also a former RuneScape player. :-P Nishkid64 (talk) 20:58, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Quantity matters sometimes, but when we cite edit counts, we are trying to elaborate why we do not think a particular user is experienced enough for adminship. Edit count sometimes correlates to experience, but that's not always true. For example, see SirFozzie's RfA. He has a very low mainspace edit total, yet he's getting unanimous support, even from me. I usually oppose people based on inexperience, and I use editcounts sometimes to make a judgment call (but usually it's more of an evaluation of the editor's contributions that I look at). Also, see WP:EDITCOUNT. Nishkid64 (talk) 21:15, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

RE:
No problem. «  A NIMUM  »  22:50, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Need Help
Hey, I need help with my user page. I want the word Uscf to go to the United States Chess Federation page. Can you please do it for me. Thanks Warrush 15:36, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks. Warrush 15:44, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

A couple of things
Sweet, how bout another one. I would like one that says, this user works as a technology assistant. Oh and what level is your runescape character. I have a level 86, and a level 82. Nice, about 4 mil combined here. Im saving up, but I can probably spare a few items. My names are Erie ks guy and sobedragon5Warrush 16:40, 12 June 2007 (UTC) It doesn't seem to be working? War  rush  17:11, 12 June 2007 (UTC) Nevermind. War  rush  17:12, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Warn Vandals
Hello. Please remember to warn vandals when you revert their edits. Thank you. Yours truly, Eddie 19:29, 12 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Hello. Please remember to warn vandals when you revert their edits, or they will think no one can stop them and continue vandalizing. Thank you. Yours truly, Eddie 21:47, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for June 11th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 03:04, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

O.J. Simpson
I'm not sure why you reverted my archiving, but please see this - archiving talk pages is considered good practice. Videmus Omnia 22:45, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Wrong Dora The Explorer Pic
Hey, someone changed the "Dora The Explorer" pic to "Ren and Stimpy". Can someone change it back to Dora The Explorer? My 4 year old daughter saw the pic and said "That isn't Dora..." Please change this pic ASAP!
 * Already dealt with. Yamamoto Ichiro (山本一郎)(会話) 00:08, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Sig
Try

RuneWiki     777

which should be within the 255 limit... Cheers!-- Dark Falls''   talk 06:24, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Khayrpur
Thank you for acting promptly in reverting. In my defence I have to say I am exasperated at the efforts of some editors who are determined to use wikipedia as a forum to further their specific interests. The text dump I removed was originally on the talk page of the article because the author had agreed not to promote his particular viewpoints (he believes the former state was and is being suppressed, which is fine but there are appropriate ways of highlighting this). Instead of working to improve his desired additions he simply dumped more and more text onto the talk page. Indeed the text dump has been there on the main page for some months but very little real progress has been made by the author to bring the article into line with wikipedia requirements. I hope you can understand this, because it is what what drives me away from being more active on wikipedia. Green Giant 23:01, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Knight5.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Knight5.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 06:55, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

Murloc AfD
What a strange message to leave on my talk page. Assuming good faith (that is, I'm not just assuming you are being disingenuous), I thank you, notwithstanding the fact that an article I nominate for AfD would be on my watchlist. I should also point out that it was neither a trial, nor a competition, for any party to win, lose, fail or succeed. - Tiswas (t) 08:55, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

RfA
Thank you visiting and commenting at my RfA, I have tried to expand on my philosophy and answers, and hope that these address your concerns. Even if they don't, thanks for stopping by. DrKiernan 14:05, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Yes. This RfA has developed quite a bit since you left your original note and I think it woud be nice if you gave it some more thought based on the extra comments made by DrKiernan and other editors. Thanks Pascal.Tesson 14:22, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

Careful with Warnings
Hello. Please do not warn vandals a level three warning on their first offense like you did here. Please use level 1 warnings on their first act of vandalism, and then continue with a level 2 and 3 warning if they continue vandalizing. Please refer to Template_messages/User_talk_namespace or visit my Counter-Vandalism Center to learn more about warning vandals. Thank you. Yours sincerely, Eddie 17:31, 17 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Yes, it wasn't their first offense, but they had not been warned before, so you still have to give them a level 1 warning. To answer your second question; I'm not an admin, but I'm planning on becoming one soon. You can see a full list of admins here. Happy editing! Yours sincerely, Eddie 17:47, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

My RfA Nomination
Hello. Thank you for nominating me for adminship! I am truly honored. However, I must sadly decline your nomination at this moment, as I've been advised by Húsönd to wait a couple of months before accepting any nomination. If you want to co-nom me along with User:Politics rule and User:Husond at that time, I will happily accept. Again, thank you. Happy editing! Yours sincerely, Eddie 19:22, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Hey Runewiki, just to let you know, I deleted the nomination because Boricuaeddie has declined at present, but whenever he does decide to go for it, feel free to add a nom or co-nom to a new one :-) Cheers,  Ry an P os tl et hw ai te  19:32, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Berta A. Dreyfus Intermediate School 49
Hello Runewiki777. I am Tut74749 who created the IS 49 page. Thanks for keeping track of the page and modifying it while I was gone for a while on wikipedia. Plz add better info on the 6 day schedule if possible. And can u please give me ur runescape username. I would appreciate it if u did. Plz respond on my user page. Thx. Why dont u log on runescape now. Tut74749 22:42, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Smile


has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing! Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Signpost updated for June 18th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 09:10, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

User:Moguera
Hi there; you may be right. But it is wiki policy to give blocks of increasing length with repeated vandalism, rather than immediate indefinite blocks. This user has not previously been blocked, and hence 48 hours is reasonable (Many admins would have said 24). The next time he vandalises it will be a week, then a month, and so forth.--Anthony.bradbury</b><sup style="color:black;">"talk" 21:20, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Page move vandalism
Hi, I see a vandal moved your userpage User:Runewiki666 and your talk page to User talk:Runewiki666. Nonsense redirects created during reversions of page move vandalism meet criteria for speedy deletion and get tagged with db-pagemove. ≈ <font color="#0000DD">M<font color="#0066FF">y<font color="#0099FF">s<font color="#00CCFF">t<font color="#00EEFF">yt o p i a  22:32, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
 * And........ they're gone!  Ry an P os tl et hw ai te  22:38, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Tacticsarena2.JPG)
Thanks for uploading Image:Tacticsarena2.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 08:10, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Mainspace
Mainspace edits are edits to the body of the encyclopedia, not to your own pages. I am sorry, am I missing something? If I have done something as an admin that seemed to you incorrect, just let me know; I am approachable.--<b style="color:red;">Anthony.bradbury</b><sup style="color:black;">"talk" 22:13, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for June 25th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:01, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

Edits
Is 700+ edits in one month considered good? ;) War  rush 
 * Hey can you sign me up for wiki news under the talk section, news in my talk page. Thanks War  rush 
 * Yah thats what I wanted, thanks. War  rush 

Cookies


Hello! I just wanted to give you a plate of cookies for being a Wikipedian. I hope your Wikistress gets better! Peace, Neranei 19:11, 27 June 2007 (UTC)


 * You're welcome! Do you know any other places where I might find stressed users other thatn Wikipedians with Wikistress level ___ ? Thanks, and I hope the cookies made you happy! Peace, Neranei 14:58, 28 June 2007 (UTC)


 * It's alright. Do you make signatures? I am too lazy/ don't have time to make a signature. If you are willing, that would be wonderful! I would really appreciate that. Thanks! Neranei 15:05, 28 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Thank you so much! That is awesome! I really appreciate it! Is there anything I can do for you? Thank you! *Neranei does a happy dance* Nera <b style="color:#00ff00;">nei</b> 15:14, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for the barnstar, I didn't think anyone really ever noticed my user page. Anyway, thanks once more!. Yours, <font color="OliveDrab">Satu <font color="OliveDrab">rday <font color="OliveDrab">Contribs 19:21, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Your shop
I saw your shop-like thing, and signed up there (great idea, that shop, B.T.W.). I signed up under the signature section. I grant you any artictic freedom you want in order to make me signature; just start on it, expiriment, and see if it works out. Randalph P. Williams 13:00, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for your help! Randalph ''' P. Williams 13:29, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Oh, and how do I change the color? Randalph ''' P. Williams 13:31, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Hey!!
Hey, come on! You can't say that you weren't the slightest bit amused by my wonderful edit. The world needs comedy, and it's stick-in-the-muds like you that rudely take it away from everyone. You should be ashamed! You need to watch Monty Python or something. Funnykitty789

Signature
I think I'll stick with the default version, but thanks for the offer :) --Melburnian 07:22, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for July 2nd, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:10, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

WOOT
Thanks, can you make me a barnstar page like yours. Thanks again! War  rush 
 * Ya, go ahead I don't know how to do it. War  rush 

Re this...
I can understand why you reverted me, but it's 100% unsourced trivia. At least sticking fact etc. in there would have addressed that, but I'm now a little confused-&mdash; arf! 23:54, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for July 9th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:10, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Thank you
Thank you, thank you, thank you so much for my new signature. I love it, really I do. You are a complete legend. Thanks again, I really appreciate it :D Angel Of  Sadness  22:45, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much for the new signature. You're right it is fabulous and grreeeeeaattttt! Thanks again  Angel Of Sadness  T / C  22:06, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Aww, thanks
Thank you for the signature thing. This is much better than that blandness I had before. :3 Lych  osis  21:14, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Oo, thank you again. I do listen to internet radio, and I am afraid of drowning in the ocean.  But, but, I don't have an expensive car, I drive a beater.  All of them except that one are going on my user page immediately.  :3   Lych  osis  21:33, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Aw, thanks again! You didn't have to do that.  :3   Lychosis  <font color="#000000">T / C  22:14, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Thank you!
Thanks for the good luck wishes! I appreciate the new signature; I am completely incompetent with HTML and all of that. I am very grateful! Here's a WikiCookie as a thank-you. Sincerely, a VERY happy  Neranei  <font color="#00ff00">T / C 23:04, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Cookie got eaten up. <font color="#6495ED" face="Comic Sans Ms">Ru<font color="#007FFF">n<font color="#1560BD">eW<font color="#0000FF">i<font color= "#00008B">ki     777 23:09, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Hee hee hee. Cookies are good! By the way, thanks for your support in my RfA. I appreciate it!  Neranei  <font color="#00ff00">T / C 23:37, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Your edits in Jeffree Star
Please do not keep changing the text in Jeffree Star to read "...after punching two female fans in the face after spectators standing near them threw bottles onstage." He did not punch two fans, he punched one. There are two references given that say there was only one. If you can find appropriate references that say there were two, then let's discuss it, otherwise please stop changing it with no explanation, or it may be construed as vandalism. -kotra 00:41, 12 July 2007 (UTC) Sorry, I assumed that you had changed it on purpose. I now realize that you were just trying to revert vandalism and accidentally included my own edit in the bunch, an easy mistake in that history. I retract the above. -kotra 00:50, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Thanks!
Thanks very much for the cool signature!-- Just James  T / C  00:45, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Re:Wowee
Most of the are reverting vandalism and giving warnings. Sure today I had to revert about 50 edits by a vandal. Anyway my holiday is in about three weeks so I will rest then. But for now I'll continue to make sure wikipedia is vandalism-free (Even though I know that this is never actually possible).  Angel Of Sadness  T / C  23:49, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Kids on logo.PNG)
Thanks for uploading Image:Kids on logo.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 18:51, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for July 16th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 20:05, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for July 23rd, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:46, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Deletion
I noticed that you commented on the MfD without giving a reason to why you said what you said. Please do so. If you do not know how to do this, please read WP:XfD. Thanks. Marlith 17:08, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

Re: Unblock plz!
If is your IP, how are you still able to edit? Not that I don't believe you, but if you can edit, why is the unblock even necessary? On another note, using "vandalizing is fun" in the edit summary was just asking for it. ˉˉanetode╦╩ 21:53, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Just kidding, it was the "anon. only" flag in the block. I'll unblock this account, but, erm, please use greater discretion in the future and don't edit your userspace from an IP. ˉˉanetode╦╩ 21:57, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

Stressed?
Hello, I noticed that you were stressed and just wanted to say that I hope everything is going well. :)  Neranei  <font color="#00ff00">T / C 00:20, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh, that's awful! I hope it gets fixed soon. Here, have a cookie. :) Cheers,  Neranei  <font color="#00ff00">T / C 18:07, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

You are welcome to play in the Wikipedia:Best User Page Contest
You are welcome to play in the Wikipedia:Best User Page Contest Since the MfD caused some confusion, you can play in the Tournament of Champions! Welcome and Bonam Fortunam! Marlith 04:41, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

Brook Watson
About your recent edit to this - you didn't fix a typo, I'm afraid. 'Usefull' was in a quotation, and therefore must stay in its original form, as should all odd-looking spellings or sentence constructions that are within quotations. Thanks. Jasper33 08:37, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

ToC
Yes, you defend the userpage you like and attack an userpage that you don't like. Marlith 22:12, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Defend is heal and attack is hurt. Marlith 22:12, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Right now!Marlith 00:30, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Signatures
Thanks for the signature, as payment for it I will copy-edit any article you want. And, by the way, I am male but the current colors are great so you need not change them. <font color="Blue">Marlith  T / C  17:09, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
 * By the way, you can defend yourself in the WP:BUPC (but defending a userpage that you like more than yours is fine also). And you can only judge once a day. Thanks.<font color="Blue">Marlith  T / C  17:12, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Please see How to copy-edit. -- Boricua  e  ddie  17:53, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
 * So, what do you want copyedited? Tell me and I'll do it. <font color="Blue">Marlith  T / C  01:07, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

ToC
Yes, that is okay. <font color="Blue">Marlith  T / C  16:25, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
 * That too<font color="Blue">Marlith  T / C  17:51, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

Thank you
Thanks a whole lot! I've wanted one for a while, but they seemed too confusing... Thank you!--<font color="#00FFFF">Kk r <font color="#0000FF">ou  ni  20:06, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for July 30th, 2007.
Apologies for the late delivery this week; my plans to handle this while on vacation went awry. Ral315

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 00:29, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

WP:BUPC
For goodness sake, I am a girl!! And even if I tell people to vote for me, there is nothing wrong with that! Don't tell me your country elects President without a campaign to win votes? RUBBISH!

Littleghostboo 09:50, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Editor review/Runewiki777
I reviewed you. Shalom Hello 18:38, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for playing
Hello Runewiki777, and thank you for playing the WP:BUPC. In the Tournament of Champions you pulled of 1 point with a massive competition and a colorful userpage. Thank you and congraturations. <font color="Blue">Marlith  T / C  03:48, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for August 6th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 09:23, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

Sig
Thanks, Here're the turkeys: -- Chris G talk  10:10, 9 August 2007 (UTC)