User talk:Runway Magazine Official

August 2022
 Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because of the following problems: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

You may request a change of username and unblock if you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization. To do this, first search Special:CentralAuth for available usernames that comply with the username policy. Once you have found an acceptable username, post the text  at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. In your reasons, you must: Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text  at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. Orange Mike &#124;  Talk  23:53, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the Paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.


 * There's no advertising or promotion has been added. What exactly is a contrary??????
 * We corrected the information! Why the edit has been reverted???
 * Our company is not fictional ! Runway Magazine is a real American - French media, which exists since 1995, name has been licensed to the production.
 * If you don't know - don't need to block the editing - VERIFY!!!!!!!!!!!!!! You call yourselves the journalists - VERIFY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! and edit yourself if you like!!!! Runway Magazine Official (talk) 00:03, 11 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Wikipedia relies on information from reliable sources that are independent of the topic under discussion. Can you provide an independent source for you made, instead of a link to your own company?
 * Wikipedia's username policy is also very clear that an account cannot be named after a business or organization, and any account that violates that rule can be blocked outright.
 * Wikipedia editors are volunteers from all walks of life - most of us are not professional journalists. All that is required is an understanding of its key policies and guidelines. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 15:10, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi, The matter of the licensing the name and the logo for the movie or musical (in that matter) is always confidential, you should know that, even if you are not a journalist. You can see the communication about the musical which is distributed to the media and posted by Elton John for example. That is why on wikipedia we added the link to the page on our official web-site to clear the situation. We agreed on use of our name and logo, but we disagree when wikipedia calls us fictional. In this case reliable source would be Library of Congress Classification (works and editions) : TT500 .R86. Runway Magazine started in 1995, in 1999 moved headquarters to Paris, France. Between 1999 and 2004 there were some reformation and restructure for the company, Runway Magazine started to go to print again in 2004 on French, then on English, then editions became international. Our trademarks registered in Europe. And as a matter of fact no other media calls us "fictional". See: https://www.insider.com/devil-wears-prada-details-you-missed-2021-6#andys-planner-confirms-how-quickly-she-became-mirandas-first-assistant-1 In this article by INSIDER, as well as on other media sources, it says: "Although there is a real Runway magazine, the fictional one in the film isn't based on it. " We believe it is reliable and independent enough for you. If you are not professional journalists, perhaps it is a right thing to do - to rely on the professional journalists and media, who's informing you about the change, instead of blocking us.
 * So please make the edit which corresponds to the information provided, and remove "fictional" from 2 these articles: Miranda Priestly, The Devil Wears Prada (film).
 * Concerning the username, we were not aware of it, as we never paid attention much to wikipedia. When we did - we tried to open an account and add necessary changes. We opened an account with the name of our media, as it is our usual practice, as we always opt for transparency. We are group of professional journalists who work in fashion. But if you prefer if to be otherwise please rename our account to Pamplemousses2022 then :-), and unblock it.
 * Thanks Runway Magazine Official (talk) 16:51, 11 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Regarding your account name, I am not an administrator here so I do not have the ability to rename your account. Even if I did, you did not follow the unblock instructions in the notice above, which is the only way that administrators will notice your request.
 * It is important that you also know that only the person who created this account is allowed to use it. Accounts can never be shared for any reason. If you have colleagues working with you who want to edit Wikipedia, they will have to create their own individual accounts.
 * Since you are writing about your employer, you must also review and comply with Wikipedia's strict paid editing disclosure policy. We also advise that you do not make edits directly to any articles where you have a conflict of interest. Instead, you should limit your involvement on those articles to making edit requests on the articles' talk pages. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 19:23, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi,
 * No one wants to edit wikipedia. We leave your community be as you like it.
 * the only thing we want is to correct defamatory statement about our company in 2 articles I mentioned . that's all.
 * We don't have any conflict of interests.
 * So now you are saying that correct defamatory statement about our company written by one of your colleagues we have to pay?
 * I asked if you can ask one of your colleagues to make necessary changes in 2 articles?
 * thanks Runway Magazine Official (talk) 21:38, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
 * The very source you linked from Insider states that, as you quoted, the fictional magazine in the film isn't based on your magazine, but rather Vogue. So the fact that you're trying to associate your magazine with the film by including links to it in the film's article without any source saying the fictional magazine's name was derived from the real magazine's is perplexing.  Therefore, calling the statements in those articles (regarding the magazine being fictional) defamatory is an incredible reach. Uhai (talk &middot; contribs) 21:56, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi,
 * I don't try associate our magazine with he film. I clearly stated that RUNWAY MAGAZINE borrowed name for the film and musical. Licensed if you like. License renewed.
 * So you can't use defamatory statement about our company - "fictional".
 * Includible reach. I submitted this incident to our attorney, He'll deal with you legally. Runway Magazine Official (talk) 22:26, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
 * This is a legal statement.
 * Any connotations and / or statements like "fictional" are interpreted in relation to the RUNWAY MAGAZINE, as an "non-existing", or as an imitation of another media.
 * Statements of this sort are considered by US and International laws as the actions of damaging the good reputation.
 * Defamation law defines defamation as the publishing of a false statement that results in harm to someone's reputation and good standing.
 * California Code, Code of Civil Procedure - CCP § 460
 * California Code, Civil Code - CIV § 48a
 * (a) In any action for damages for the publication of a libel in a daily or weekly news publication, or of a slander by radio broadcast, plaintiff shall only recover special damages unless a correction is demanded and is not published or broadcast, as provided in this section.  Plaintiff shall serve upon the publisher at the place of publication, or broadcaster at the place of broadcast, a written notice specifying the statements claimed to be libelous and demanding that those statements be corrected. The notice and demand must be served within 20 days after knowledge of the publication or broadcast of the statements claimed to be libelous.
 * We'd like to state that your published statement is causing damage to RUNWAY MAGAZINE reputation.
 * We'd like to request immediate actions from your side: correction and / or modification, and / or removal of this statement.
 * Please kindly let me know how you'd like us to proceed, concerning these articles - remove "fictional" from 2 these articles: Miranda Priestly, The Devil Wears Prada (film). Runway Magazine Official (talk) 22:31, 11 August 2022 (UTC)


 * ok, no matter
 * I don't care about your policies, about your community, refusal of transparency, and disrespect to people.
 * It's your community - you do as you please.
 * Although maybe our attorney will convince you to remove defamatory statements about our company you proudly display on your pages.
 * I tried peacefully - doesn't work let's do it another way. Runway Magazine Official (talk) 22:22, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Do not make legal threats on Wikipedia. Doing so will only lessen the chances of getting you unblocked. 47.227.95.73 (talk) 22:27, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
 * This is not a threat - this is legal statement.
 * Any connotations and / or statements like "fictional" are interpreted in relation to the RUNWAY MAGAZINE, as an "non-existing", or as an imitation of another media.
 * Statements of this sort are considered by US and International laws as the actions of damaging the good reputation.
 * Defamation law defines defamation as the publishing of a false statement that results in harm to someone's reputation and good standing.
 * California Code, Code of Civil Procedure - CCP § 460
 * California Code, Civil Code - CIV § 48a
 * (a) In any action for damages for the publication of a libel in a daily or weekly news publication, or of a slander by radio broadcast, plaintiff shall only recover special damages unless a correction is demanded and is not published or broadcast, as provided in this section.  Plaintiff shall serve upon the publisher at the place of publication, or broadcaster at the place of broadcast, a written notice specifying the statements claimed to be libelous and demanding that those statements be corrected. The notice and demand must be served within 20 days after knowledge of the publication or broadcast of the statements claimed to be libelous.
 * We'd like to state that your published statement is causing damage to RUNWAY MAGAZINE reputation.
 * We'd like to request immediate actions from your side: correction and / or modification, and / or removal of this statement.
 * Please kindly let me know how you'd like us to proceed, concerning these articles - remove "fictional" from 2 these articles: Miranda Priestly, The Devil Wears Prada (film). Runway Magazine Official (talk) 22:31, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Blatant legal threat, see WP:NLT. 47.227.95.73 (talk) 22:36, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Also please see Libel. No one here has the capability to help you with your allegations of defamation. Uhai (talk &middot; contribs) 22:39, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
 * It's not even true. According to your website, your Runway Magazine dates to 2004; the novel on which the film is based dates from 2003. You are asking us to make our Wikipedia articles incorrect, since both articles you mention involve fictional works based on a fictional magazine. (By the way, no movie studio is going to base such works on a real magazine under its name; that would be daft.) You are making a clear legal threat which violates our WP:NLT policy, which I advise you to read -- and I urge you to retract your threat. Antandrus (talk) 23:00, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
 * 1995 Runway Magazine Official (talk) 23:04, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 23:04, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

Legal threats
I don't see where anyone educated you about this, so I'll just leave this here to read. No legal threats. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:54, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
 * they were advised.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 17:00, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Danke. I ever live in hope of calming the waters, repairing the bridges, and bringing joy.to the sorrowful --  Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:29, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Those are noble goals. Don't get jaded, like me :) -- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 17:39, 12 August 2022 (UTC)