User talk:Rush922

Recent edit to Pterophyllum
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Pterophyllum, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 03:53, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Faridoon Shahryar


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Faridoon Shahryar. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Rajeev Masand. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Rajeev Masand. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. —C.Fred (talk) 01:52, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Faridoon Shahryar


A tag has been placed on Faridoon Shahryar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. —C.Fred (talk) 02:10, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

Unsourced content
Hi there, please don't submit content like this without including an actual reference. The bracketed "[15]" just looks to me like you copied content from another page but didn't bother to include a reference. See Referencing for Beginners if you don't know how to add references. Also, we don't care about IMDB ratings, because any group of internet cranks can skew an online audience rating. See MOS:FILM for instructions on how to deal with real, academic audience response info. Thank you, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:46, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

One of your recent additions has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information.
 * You add images that are copyrighted elsewhere. Please stop. Materialscientist (talk) 08:35, 21 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your good-faith upload of File:Official Thugs of Hindostan Banner.jpg, but that is at too high a resolution to be acceptable. I have already uploaded this image in reduced size at File:Thugs of Hindostan movie banner.jpg. Could you please tag your upload with db-author, since it's redundant? Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 13:33, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

WP:NFF
Please read WP:NFF: "Films that have not been confirmed by reliable sources to have commenced principal photography should not have their own articles". Please stop edit-warring. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:37, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
 * Loveyatri ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Loveyatri check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Loveyatri?client=notify fix with Dab solver])
 * added a link pointing to Ban
 * Mehrangarh ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Mehrangarh check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Mehrangarh?client=notify fix with Dab solver])
 * added a link pointing to Epic

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Official Announcement Poster for "Takht," by Dharma Productions.jpeg
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:06, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Official Announcement Poster for &#34;Takht,&#34; by Dharma Productions.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Official Announcement Poster for &. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:39, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

WP:NYA

Orphaned non-free image File:Official Poster - Thugs of Hindostan.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Official Poster - Thugs of Hindostan.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:43, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

Original research
Please do not add your own personal analysis of what critics thought. For example, in, you said that a five-minute video was "positively received". The source you cited, however, says nothing about positive reviews. If you'd like to include this kind of analysis, you have to quote a source that explicitly says it received positive reviews. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:43, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Fair enough. I took your advice and found some articles that talked specifically about positive reviews from fans, and referenced them while adding back that text.  Please check and see if it is satisfactory. Thanks.  Rush922 (talk) 04:20, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Yeah, seems better. It looks like those sources reported some negativity, but, yeah, they seem to be saying that the overall reception was positive. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:52, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 6
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Phantom Films, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sacred Games ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Phantom_Films check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Phantom_Films?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:36, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Koffee with Karan episodes has been accepted
 List of Koffee with Karan episodes, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 15:32, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=List_of_Koffee_with_Karan_episodes help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

File:Red Chillies Entertainment Logo.jpg
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 21:35, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 2
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Zero (2018 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Connaught Place ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Zero_%282018_film%29 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Zero_%282018_film%29?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:20, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Zero official poster- small res.jpg
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:03, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

WP:ICTF
Hi there, re: this, please familiarise yourself with the sorts of references our community considers appropriate for inclusion. Random blogs and websites like globalvillagespace.com are unsuitable. We're not interested in what amateurs have to say, or what content harvesting websites have to say. We only care what mainstream reliable sources with established reputations for fact-checking and accuracy have to say about any given subject. The mere existence of website does not warrant inclusion. See WP:ICTF for a general list of sites that are and are not considered reliable in the context of Indian entertainment. Thank you, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:25, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

Filler
Hi there, re: this and subsequent edit summary, there is no "career graph". Nobody's drawing Venn diagrams to map the various actors' intersections with others. This is filler material. We should be following MOS:FILM for guidance, not allowing unchecked memes from propagating across various articles. Note also that the content is largely unverifiable and could be removed on that basis. How do you expect to prove that Zero is the "second collaboration between the two actresses and Khan after their 2012 film Jab Tak Hai Jaan"? You can prove that these people are credited in two films together, but can you prove that there aren't three? Could they have collaborated on a project that was shelved? Could they have collaborated in some other way, like on stage or writing a novel? It's just vague, context-less filler material that doesn't improve our understanding of the article subject, the film Zero. I won't remove the content, because I don't care enough to, but consider this food for thought from someone with a lot of experience editing Indian film articles. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:04, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

Test
Rush922&#9884;(talk) 02:41, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

Janhvi Kapoor
Hi, do you plan to create an article on Janhvi Kapoor based on your draft? If so, you certainly don't mind me editing your draft, do you? I am interested in the article's subject and would like to work on it. Thanks. 2.51.187.130 (talk) 12:24, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Sure you can work on it. A few months ago I was in the process of trying to get it approved for reinstation, but it kind of fizzled out and I didn't get many responses. I'm not even sure if she qualifies to have her own article as of yet, as she's only had 1 film release (typically you need more than 1) and has only had a brand endorsement so far, that's about it.  But by the time her second film (Takht) comes out in 2 years, then I bet the community would be more accepting of her own page.  Probably a better bet for now might be Sara Ali Khan; both her first and second films are coming out next month and only within a few weeks of each other, so she'll be qualified to have her own article much more quickly. Rush922(talk) 18:02, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks, and, oh, what a coincidence— I just created a draft for Sara Ali Khan at Draft:Sara Ali Khan. You are welcome to help.😀 Also, it isn’t necessary you need to work in more than one film; as long as the subject satisfies either WP:GNG or WP:NACTOR, they qualify for an article. Janhvi certainly does satisfy the former. In fact, look at some of the arguments at WP:Articles for deletion/Sara Ali Khan (the article was created based on her rumoured debut and was kept because many felt GNG was passed. Sadly, it turned out to be a rumour, after all, and the article was redirected.) 2.51.17.139 (talk) 19:14, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Sorry for not responding earlier, I told myself earlier to respond to my talk page but it slipped my mind. Hmm..yea having looked at the WP:GNG page it seems you're right about Janhvi meeting notability. At the time I made the draft I wasn't sure if she did meet notability or not, as several admins had only told me that an actor needed to have more than 1 film done to be considered noteworthy.  But it's true that Janhvi has generated buzz as per her debut and recent fashion activity- she is considered a celebrity now.  If you decide to request it to be reinstated as an article, you might have better luck than I did.  As for your Sara Ali Khan draft, it looks nice- it seems the commenter below submitted it for creation, but I don't see it on the page now- maybe whenever you are ready, you can request it for submission so an administrator can approve it? Rush922(talk) 04:08, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
 * [EDIT to the above response]: My mistake, I just read the discussion on Sara Ali Khan's talk page: | you can read it here for yourself. It seems several admins state the actor DOES need to have released on at least 1 film for notability, so as per their reasoning Sara won't count yet as able to have her own page - but it's only a month till both of her films release anyway so it's not too long. Rush922(talk) 04:21, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi, I have decided to join Wikipedia with an account since editing around with these drafts are often troublesome with an IP address, especially one that changes regularly (Technically, that would make me a newbie minus the fact I was an active IP editor for the past 4 years😄). Btw, I have submitted Sara's draft for creation. See you around! RajFilmBuff (talk) 17:37, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Zero official poster- small res.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Zero official poster- small res.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:58, 24 November 2018 (UTC)

Thank you
Thank you for your clear edit summary here. Though we typically use a film poster's billing block for determining starring cast, India persistently fails to participate in worldwide norms, which requires us sometimes to have to use other main sources, like trailers, or the film credits, to determine this. Anyway, thanks for the clear edit summary. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:18, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
 * No problem. Thanks as well for the feedback. Yea I've noticed that on many Indian film posters they outright don't even mention the main stars -even big ones - instead just listing the producers, screenwriters, etc. Only every so often do I see them listed, like for Helicopter Eela. I've wondered why that is- you'd think the actors would be the first ones listed. Perhaps Indians are assumed to know them already?  But yea, had to look to other sources to verify for Zero. Rush922(talk) 06:21, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Lion King poster small.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Lion King poster small.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:40, 27 November 2018 (UTC)

File:KoffeewithKaranS6 logo.jpg
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:07, 1 December 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Red Chillies Entertainment Logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Red Chillies Entertainment Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:55, 1 December 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Yash Raj films logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Yash Raj films logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:00, 1 December 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Mental Hai Kya poster small.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Mental Hai Kya poster small.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:48, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 5
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
 * Mental Hai Kya ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Mental_Hai_Kya check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Mental_Hai_Kya?client=notify fix with Dab solver])
 * added a link pointing to Indian
 * Shamshera ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Shamshera check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Shamshera?client=notify fix with Dab solver])
 * added a link pointing to Indian

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:51, 5 December 2018 (UTC)

File:Shamshera poster.jpg
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:01, 5 December 2018 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Sara Ali Khan has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sara Ali Khan. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 03:40, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! Rush922(talk) 12:11, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 19
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Zero (2018 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Amazon ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Zero_%282018_film%29 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Zero_%282018_film%29?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Zero official poster 5.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Zero official poster 5.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:10, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Zero official poster small.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Zero official poster small.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:11, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Zero poster 6 clear.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Zero poster 6 clear.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:12, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Zero official poster 6.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Zero official poster 6.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:45, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

File:Tisch school logo original.png
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:03, 29 December 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Tisch School logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:Tisch School logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:43, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:URI film poster small.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:URI film poster small.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:51, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Simmba poster.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Simmba poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:52, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Me Too movement (India) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Me Too movement (India) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Me Too movement (India) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- Eng. M.Bandara -Talk  05:30, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

Reversion of indic script deletion
Hi, I noticed you have been reverting my edits related to Indicscript, unfortunately this is not allowed as per consensus have a look here INDICSCRIPT Shrikanthv (talk) 11:16, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

Community Insights Survey
Share your experience in this survey

Hi ,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. [mailto:surveys@wikimedia.org Email us] if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely, RMaung (WMF) 16:36, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey
Share your experience in this survey

Hi ,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. [mailto:surveys@wikimedia.org Email us] if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely, RMaung (WMF) 15:38, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey
Share your experience in this survey

Hi ,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. [mailto:surveys@wikimedia.org Email us] if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely, RMaung (WMF) 20:39, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Edits on Paramahansa Yogananda page
Your improvements on this page are noticed but when making major changes to this page, first take your ideas to the talk page. I have edited your updated lead paragraph. I am not finished... let's talk.Red Rose 13 (talk) 13:53, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Ok, thanks for trimming my improvements as needed - but I don't see why I need to take my ideas to the talk page first; couldn't subsequent users just undo my changes if they disagreed with it, and then if I continued to press for them, then we go to the talk page? Seems easier to me. And what do you mean by 'let's talk'...about what? Rush922(talk) 06:01, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Over the years this page has been edited to perfection by many editors and I am one of the editors who have watched this page ever since. If you want to make substantial changes like you just did, please bring your ideas to the talk page before implementing. Perhaps just editing how you wish is easier for you but not other editors. We like to keep the page steady and add changes when there is agreement. Thanks. Red Rose 13 (talk) 14:24, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
 * I understand where you're coming from but have a couple of issues with this. First is- edited to 'perfection'? As far as I know no page is 'perfect' and can always be tweaked; it sounds like this is more of a control issue for you as to how the page itself appears. I personally found the lead paragraph woefully in need of addition, as it was barely a few sentences long (whereas some pages of less impactful spiritual teachers have far longer ones) - so that shows how 'perfection' isn't always what we deem it.
 * Another is - how are editors who are unfamiliar with the page supposed to know that 'you' like to keep the page steady? AFAIK there is no rule on Wikipedia that says we have to go by common consensus first before making any changes; otherwise it wouldn't be free to edit in the first place. So the fact that you are only imposing these things on me after my edits speaks to the fact that this sentiment isn't always shared by everyone and thus doesn't always need to be followed. That being said, I can understand the common-sense need for it and will keep it in mind for the future. Rush922(talk) 21:23, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

Edit warring on Gautama Buddha
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. JimRenge (talk) 11:00, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
 * I was not edit-warring. I reverted your undo of my addition (only once), and then when another editor also disagreed, I acquiesed and added a different picture (an alternate statue this time). It would have been edit warring if I had continued to assert that same picture afterward. Rush922(talk) 11:06, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

Swami: Original Research
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Swami, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. To verify, please see page 1286 in the referenced book. Moksha88 (talk) 05:04, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

Articles_for_deletion/Buddhism,_the_Fulfilment_of_Hinduism
Should there be an article about this subject? Please give your opinion here.-- Farang Rak Tham   (Talk) 15:08, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

Kate Middleton
Thanks for your discussion on this article. Totally agree. Given all mainstream media refers to her as Kate, it certainly needs to be in the opening paragraph. Rebroad (talk) 07:46, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
 * No problem :) Ha, you know what's funny? I made my argument on that talk page exactly a year ago today.  I was sort of shocked back then that hardly anyone agreed with me on the talk page, since that name seemed an obvious inclusion; by then I had been in lengthy arguments on other talk pages and maybe was at bit winded out, so I left it at that.  But it's good to see that a year later you were able to add it on the front page after all! Rush922(talk) 05:57, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

May 2020
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to Satyananda Giri, without good reason. They should have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 13:24, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

June 2020
Hello. I wanted to let you know that your recent edit(s) to the Back to the Future plot summary have been removed because they added a significant amount of unnecessary detail. Please avoid excessive detail and high word counts when editing plot summaries/synopses. You may read the plot summary edit guides to learn more about contributing constructively to plot summaries/synopses. There are also specific guidelines for films, musicals, television episodes, anime/manga, novels and non-fiction books. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 12:23, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Dharma Productions logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:Dharma Productions logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:29, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Takht (film)


Hello, Rush922. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Takht".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:43, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Daily Mail reference at Bhangra (dance)
Hi. Please do not use the Daily Mail as you did at Bhangra (dance). It is not a reliable source. See WP:DAILYMAIL. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 11:16, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

Bengal tiger
Hey : I just saw that you nominated this page for GA status. It is currently rated B-class, and I therefore suggest you first overhaul this to be fit for A-class rating. Since you did not yet contribute a single word to this page : are you sure that you are prepared for a GA review? -- BhagyaMani (talk) 08:10, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi, thanks for informing me. I wasn't aware of the class-rating system, I just thought it seemed like a good article and wanted to nominate it as such.  But if you think it's not ready yet, you can remove or change the nomination; I'm not that invested in it, it just seemed like a good idea.  Thanks. Rush922(talk) 09:36, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
 * I cannot and will not remove a nomination by other editors, nor can I review this as I'm one of the main contributors to this page ! I think it needs a lot of work for being rated A. You find the criteria for the different classes at WikiProject_Cats/Assessment, see the table titled WikiProject article quality grading scheme. -- BhagyaMani (talk) 09:47, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Hello :). Per WP:GAN/I, nominators typically work on the article themselves, but it is allowed to nominate if you believe the article meets the criteria. If you think so, you should first contact the authors to see what they think. I think there are two things you can do now:
 * The easiest is to withdraw the nomination by removing the GA nominee template from the talk page (see WP:GAN/I), improve the article, and then renominate.
 * If you feel more ambitious: Improve the article while waiting for a reviewer.
 * The lede needs improving: you shouldn't have paragraphs consisting of one sentence
 * Figure out whether more sentences need updating, for instance the following is cited to a 2000 paper, and may be superceded: "The pattern of genetic variation in the Bengal tiger corresponds to the premise that it arrived in India approximately 12,000 years ago"
 * The A-class is actually above the GA class, confusingly. FemkeMilene (talk) 16:19, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
 * You are right that the table shows A above GA. The site was overhauled a while ago, and I will ask around whether this maybe a mistake. It used to be GA above A. -- BhagyaMani (talk) 16:40, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

Hey did you work on the table WikiProject article quality grading scheme in WikiProject_Cats? Or do you know why it shows the A class above GA ?? I remember that it used to be GA above A, i.e. the other way round. -- BhagyaMani (talk) 16:48, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
 * I actually don't know, I got the quality table from WP:Dogs. It might be because some WikiProjects have their own, intensive A-class reviews, and that standard has been circulating around WP? WP:Cats doesn't actually use A-class, though, and just skip B-GA instead. --SilverTiger12 (talk) 17:45, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Oops: are you sure about A?? It is mentioned in that table though. -- BhagyaMani (talk) 17:55, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Yeah, most WikiProjects don't do A-class. Wikipedia:Content assessment/A-Class criteria  explains the more stringent review compared to GA-class: you typically need at least two reviewers. FemkeMilene (talk) 16:06, 13 May 2021 (UTC)


 * I just looked at picking this up and also noticed that you had not contributed to the article. This is a pretty high level article and while not strictly necessary it makes a big difference if the nominator has been involved in editing the article. At the very least I would expect a nominator to have read through the article and be familiar with many of the sources. This almost always involves making improvements. It is also a factor that you don't appear to have much experience with the GA process. Reviewing an article of this size is a big undertaking for a reviewer and as such some (me included unfortunately) may be unwilling to take it on if they are not sure of how involved the nominator is. This may be why no one has taken it up yet. I don't want to discourage you from getting involved in the process and will just reiterate that you have done nothing wrong, but if you want some unsolicited advice I suggest starting with nominating some shorter articles you have been more involved in writing to get a hang of what is required. Also will just add that the A class is a bit of a red herring. Outside the Military History project it is not really used. Aircorn (talk) 23:01, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the response, I appreciate your kind insight. To be honest, I'm a pretty light and occasional editor on Wikipedia and so I didn't have any idea of how involved a person should be or should not be when nominating an article. All that happened was one day, I was passing through the Bengal Tiger article and thought that it looked like a good article, from a comprehensive standpoint, and so I thought it should be labeled as such; since it wasn't, I just thought I would nominate it. I just looked up the markup code and added it; it seems I didn't look well enough at the "Good Article Nominations/Instructions" page which hinted that a nominator preferably be well-versed in the topic, etc.  I didn't realize there was that much more that went into the process; I just thought it was something impersonal, like any user could nominate an article and let other reviewers decide if it was good or not.  I guess in the future I will verse myself better and be more careful though.  Thanks again for the heads up. Rush922(talk) 07:28, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
 * In some ways you are right. It is how the process started at least. It has since become a lot more involved. Maybe too involved. I wish you the best with your edits. Aircorn (talk) 19:23, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Padre Pio profile.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Padre Pio profile.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:34, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:KoffeewithKaranS6 logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:KoffeewithKaranS6 logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:33, 10 July 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Yash raj films logo small.png
Thanks for uploading File:Yash raj films logo small.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:52, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Red Chillies Entertainment logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:Red Chillies Entertainment logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:20, 11 December 2023 (UTC)