User talk:Rushbugled13/Archives/2012

Anime Revolution
Hello,

From what I've gathered about Anime Revolution, they are of a completely different entity from Anime Evolution, which is a now defunct anime convention. I don't believe merging the articles would be appropriate in this case as it would be the same as merging the articles of two different companies on the basis that they do nearly the same things. If there is a way to merge it that wouldn't conflict the two entities, could I have some advice as to how it would be done? Apologies in advance, this was my first page as I noticed that AR did not have a page on the Anime Conventions list yet. IceZephyr (talk) 04:39, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text to the top of the article.)
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Articles for creation/Gregory Chow.
 * To edit the submission, you can use the edit button at the top of the article, near the search bar
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Help desk or the [ reviewer's talk page]. Alternatively you can ask a reviewer questions via live help
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Skeowsha (talk) 13:26, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Gregory Chow, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!  Chzz  ► 02:13, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
 * You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the Help desk or on the [ reviewer's talk page]
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited National Medal of Technology and Innovation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Harold Rosen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dark Past, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pop (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:25, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

Your review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Missa Brevis by Leonard Bernstein
There's a question about your review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Missa Brevis by Leonard Bernstein at the AfC help desk. You said there was insufficient content to merit an article on Bernstein's work. I disagree; there seems to be quite a lot of detailed content explicitly discussing Berrnstein's Missa as opposed to such works in geeral, including information on the particular work's history and reception. If I'm missing something, could you please clarify your rationale at the help desk? Huon (talk) 21:35, 8 November 2012 (UTC)


 * I see that several  experienced editors here think this article is basically OK (as do I), & one of the most respected in this subject area has accepted it. (It has been further cleaned up a little.) By our usual criteria, Bernstein is a famous composer, not merely notable, and all major works of such people are notable (see WP:CREATIVE and WP:MUSIC--as the amount of available material shows.  The standard for acceptance at AfC is having a good chance of being an acceptable Wikipedia article, one not likely to fail AfD. It is not necessary for it to be a perfect article.    DGG ( talk ) 22:10, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

Your rejection of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/BAYADA Home Health Care
Hello Rushbugled - Would you please clarify what is not neutral in the article? If you would not mind sharing as well, you noted that the article should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. With the exception of confirming the location of the company and services in the first citation, all 8 other sources are independent, third party, verifiable sources. Please let me know what steps need to be taken to resubmit this article under Wikipedia guidelines. Regatta2012 (talk) 16:35, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

Rejection of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/University of Victoria Computer Science Department
Hi there,

The article Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/University of Victoria Computer Science Department was recently rejected, citing "insufficient content" and suggesting it be merged with the University of Victoria page - however, many other Computer Science departments at universities across Canada have their own pages, some of which are listed here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Computer_science_departments_in_Canada. Can you please explain why this article was rejected? It has significantly more content than some of these other pages, such as David R. Cheriton School of Computer Science or UBC Computer Science Department. Let me know, thanks! Jwrkstdy (talk) 17:56, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
 * I see you accepted this article in the end. I have just nominated it for deletion at Articles_for_deletion/University_of_Victoria_Computer_Science_Department as no indication of sufficient notability for a department.  DGG ( talk ) 22:00, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

Rejection of submission for Walker Cane Hybrid
Thank you for your review of my article on Walker Cane Hybrid. You commented that it was rejected indicating that "the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia". However, your reference was to a generic reference article on mobility aids which briefly describes a variety of mobility aids (like an index), virtually all of which have a separate and detailed article on Wikipedia (e.g. assistive cane, walker (mobility), crutch, gait trainer, wheelchair). I placed the reference in the "Mobility Aid" article while I was preparing a detailed article for submission which, like the others, will be linked to. While a Walker Cane Hybrid provides some of the support properties of a cane and a walker, is unlike either and its use is very unique in both the way it is adjusted and the way it is used (which is why a design and use patent was recently granted on it by the USPTO). Since the Walker Cane Hybrid is used differently than a cane or a walker proper use is a safety issue for the user. An analogy is that the use, and the appropriateness of the user, is different for driving a car versus a motor cycle. I respectfully request that you reconsider the submission. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KDPetersen (talk • contribs) 23:15, 11 November 2012 (UTC)