User talk:Rushdishams

Welcome!
Hello, Rushdishams, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Text Denoising, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Fiddle  Faddle  21:43, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Proposed deletion of Text Denoising


The article Text Denoising has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * This is more an academic paper than an encyclopaedic article. Wikipedia may not be used to publish either academic papers nor to aggregate academic papers to analyse them or research them. It either requires serious edits or deletion.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fiddle  Faddle  21:43, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

August 2013
Hello, Rushdishams. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Text Denoising, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. ''It is worth reading and studying WP:ACADEME to start to understand more about the environment of Wikipedia. It is not, absolutely not, what you are used to as a scientist.'' Fiddle   Faddle  21:46, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

I am afraid there is a real issue here
The article you have contributed is or appears to be an attempt to publicise your own work on Wikipedia. You most definitely need to read WP:ACADEME before getting bent out of shape by hearing this comment. The working environment you are used to is one where such things are normal practice. Wikipedia is very different, strange, even, and does not allow such things. Your work may or may not be notable in a WIkipedia sense. It looks as if it is notable in an academic sense. But the two are not congruent concepts, and WIkipedia deals with such things in a robust manner, one likely to upset you if you don't understand how different this environment is from the working academic environment you are used to.

It is likely that the article will be deleted. In its current form it simply may not exist here (0.9 probability). The thing is, I know this is likely to upset you because it looks like a criticism of your work. Please trust me that it is not. Instead it is a criticism of the article you have submitted to public scrutiny. THat is simply an article publicising your work.

If the topic is notable in an encyclopaedic sense then the article can be saved, but in a greatly slimmed down version, with references in relibale sources. Your papers are primary sources and do not count, I'm afraid. They may be used where a reliable source refers to them, or they may be used in a very limited manner as primary sources. But they may not be analysed, because that is original research. I said this place was strange. The slimmed down article must assert the notability of the topic and cite that notability.

I hope this helps you cope with this crazy place. I know its a lot to take in. Fiddle  Faddle  22:36, 14 August 2013 (UTC)