User talk:Russelsprouts91

Feel free to bring questions to me or any other editor if you need answers. Tealwisp (talk) 19:33, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Breepe
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Breepe, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Breepe is pure vandalism; this includes redirects created during cleanup of page move vandalism. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Breepe, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot (talk) 20:10, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Breepe
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself. Please use the template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. ttonyb1 (talk) 21:40, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ttonyb1 (talk) 23:19, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

As ttonyb1 stated, repeatedly removing speedy deletion notices is grounds for blocking. I won't do it at this time, since you're new, but now you know the rule. Also, please see WP:Verifiability before trying to add this article again. Thanks. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 23:37, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Breepe
A tag has been placed on Breepe, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. Mifter (talk) 23:48, 21 January 2009 (UTC)


 * I'm sorry, but I've deleted this as meeting WP:CSD. You may want to carefully review Your first article.
 * For more general information about the deletion process, please see User:Dlohcierekim/deletion
 * If you believe the subject does in fact meet notability guidelines with reliable sources providing verifiable information, please contact me on my talk page.
 * If you wish to make test edits or work on the article before creating it, you can create a test page at User:/test.
 * Cheers, and happy editing.  Dloh  cierekim  23:51, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Breepe
Wikipedia is not for made up words. If you were to be able to point to common usage of the word by point to Google references that might have given some credibility to word. There was nothing to support it. Sorry... ttonyb1 (talk) 23:52, 21 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Russelsprouts91, right there is the reason. Insulting others is not a good way to get them to help you or think you have a valid point. DMacks (talk) 00:04, 22 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Did you not read the notices above on your talk page? It was deleted because in no way meets inclusion criteria for an encyclopedia. It makes no sense. In fact, some would say it appears to be mocking the person who "invented" it. This would be a form of disparagement, which is wholly unacceptable on Wikipedia.


 * As has been said before, Wikipedia is not for something someone happens to invent. What makes meet Notability, the notability guideline for Wikipedia articles?


 * What about it being invented by this particular person makes it notable? What WP:reliable sources document/discuss it's use? What is its impact on the language? On society? I searched Google for reliable sources for this. I found none that refer to it in this usage.


 * Please read the guidelines and policies linked in the welcome above. Think about the subject and this being an encyclopedia. Then contact me again on my talk page if you want it restored. I will gladly do so. And we can then discuss its merits/demerits at Articles for deletion. That decision is totally up to you. I await your reply. Cheers,  Dloh  cierekim  01:47, 22 January 2009 (UTC)