User talk:Russholio33

Edit warring at Dan Bongino
Your recent editing history at Dan Bongino shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. -- Valjean (talk) 18:50, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
 * I see that you have continued your edit warring. Not only will you get blocked for edit warring, your edit is counterfactual, so you're really skating on thin ice. Just stop it. -- Valjean (talk) 02:09, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Maybe you should warn the other person about publishing "counterfactual" information. In case you missed it, it was deemed that there was no Russian interference in the election. To continue stating there is is opinion and purely subjective. I guess I mistakenly believed that encyclopedias were interested in true information. Russholio33 (talk) 03:32, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
 * We are definitely "interested in true information." There is a big difference between what you have done and others have done. Other editors are writing what RS say. What you're writing is based on unreliable sources and conspiracy theories from Trump, Fox News, RT, and Putin. You have misunderstood what's been happening.
 * The Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections is a proven thing (read the article), and it's still happening,right now in 2020, and Trump and the GOP refuse to stop it or condemn it.
 * What has not happened is getting proof that Trump "conspired" and "coordinated" with the Russians. Mueller investigated those words and wasn't able to produce the evidence in that rushed and bungled investigation. There was enough obstruction of the investigation by Trump to prevent that from being discovered, so we don't know if it happened or not. We can't say with any certainty that it did happen or didn't happen. He should have let the investigation play out according to all the rules of the legal system.
 * That he and his campaign colluded and co-operated with the Russian interference was confirmed by the Mueller investigation. There is plenty of evidence that happened, but that is not illegal, just disloyal to the American people and a subversion of the electoral system. His campaign welcomed and invited it openly. The Russians should not be running the show. The Mueller investigation also found many instances of obstruction, deception, destruction of evidence, prevention of people testifying, use of encrypted devices to communicate with Russians, etc. Fortunately, a number of allied foreign intelligence agencies have overheard many of the communications between Trump's people and Russians, already starting in 2015, and they reported it to the FBI. Now that Trump is gradually taking control of the intelligence and legal system (in the same manner as happens in authoritarian dictatorships, where the leader controls everything, and there is no division of powers), he is running what has been called a cover-up with the aid of Barr and Durham. They are serving Trump, not the people.
 * So the takeaway from this is......the Russians did interfere in the 2016 elections to harm Clinton's chances and help Trump win (and she still won the popular vote). Putin said publicly he wanted Trump to win, and he helped him do it. Those are the facts. -- Valjean (talk) 01:55, 2 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Ha, ha, ha. Maybe you should get tour "facts" from sources other than CNN and other left-wing propaganda machines. Russholio33 (talk) 16:51, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

, see WP:RSPSOURCES. X1\ (talk) 05:57, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

September 2022
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, you may be blocked from editing. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 01:38, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

Take a hike. Russholio33 (talk) 03:23, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 12:18, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

🤣🤣Oooh, scary. Russholio33 (talk) 12:24, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 13:45, 6 September 2022 (UTC)