User talk:RussianAnt/Casiguran Dumagat Agta

Hello, I think your article is off to a good start. The lead section isn't too long and just by reading the lead, I have a pretty good grasp of what it's going to be about. Thus, it is clear and easy to understand. In terms of spelling and grammar, everything seems fine. You also maintain a neutral tone and there is no bias. Some suggestions would be to include a bibliography section and then add the newly added references with bullet points under them. It's more organized that way and the references won't be all muddled up together. You can also probably add 1 or 2 recent references, just to have more diversity in authors, since one author is used for seven of the references. Also, add some headers for the main topics of your articles. Headers such as history or background, geographical distribution, dialect, phonology, or even writing system. All in all, so far your writing is fine and it seems that you're off to a good start. Just need to add more content, a bibliography section, headers, and maybe one or two more recent references.

Final Review
Hi Anthony, this is my feedback for your final project. The 6 points on which I'm grading you are Language, Structure, Balance, Accuracy, Relevance, and Length. Here are my assessments on each of those areas:


 * 1) Language: On the whole, the article employs proper English spelling and grammar. 5 points.
 * 2) Structure: The structure follows the suggested template. 5 points.
 * 3) Balance: At present, the article appears to reflect a neutral point of view. 5 points.
 * 4) Accuracy: The article draws upon a variety of scholarly sources and properly cites claims. 5 point.
 * 5) Relevance: The information is relevant. 5 points.
 * 6) Length: Word count 1516/2000 (including headers but not bibliography). 4 points.

The final score is 29/30. Have a great summer! Chuck Haberl (talk) 18:05, 11 May 2021 (UTC)