User talk:RussianLiberal

WikiProject Trade
Congrats and thanks for joining the Trade project. It's fairly new and needs more people and ideas, but it's important that we make it work. I think that a lot of today's economic problems may have been caused by trade policies designed to benefit a few corporations at the expense of most of the world's peoples, and the environment. Cheers. Bjenks (talk) 17:08, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

Alexey Pivovarov
Hi. Regarding the article you have re-created, Alexey Pivovarov, please be aware that the article will need to show that he satisfies the notability requirements of WP:BIO in order for it to be retained, and must have at least one source to support it. Also, it must make at least a credible claim of importance in order to avoid speedy deletion according to reason CSD A7 -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:50, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Alexey Pivovarov


A tag has been placed on Alexey Pivovarov requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Mt king  (edits)  10:51, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

Removing Speedy at Alexey Pivovarov
Welcome to Wikipedia, thank you for taking the time to create a page here. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you created yourself. Because Wikipedia policy does not allow the creator of the page to remove deletion tags, an automated program has replaced the deletion tag you removed from Alexey Pivovarov. Please do not continue to remove the deletion tag, instead, if you disagree with the deletion, you can follow these steps: Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do. For further help about the deletion, you could contact the user who first placed the tag or a highly active user who is willingly to help with deletion. This message was left by a bot, so please do not contact the bot about the deletion. Thank you, - SDPatrolBot (talk) 10:53, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) Go to the page by clicking this link. Once there, select the button that says [ Click here to contest this speedy deletion].
 * 2) This will take you to the talk page, where you can make your case by explaining why the page does not meet Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

Re:Alexey_Pivovarov

 * Re:Alexey_Pivovarov

Really, article needs more content than " is famous " Bulwersator (talk) 10:56, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I am working but some bastard tries to delete it before ready. Intervika OK, sources OK--RussianLiberal (talk) 10:59, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Please leave off the incivility, or you may end up being blocked -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:00, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

Removing Speedy at Alexey Pivovarov
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Alexey Pivovarov. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's . Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 10:58, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
 * You re fullish robot and I am a man!--RussianLiberal (talk) 11:00, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
 * You must not remove a Speedy Deletion template from an article you created yourself. Follow the instructions, click the button, and explain why it should not be deleted - explain on its Talk page that you are still in the process of creating it -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:01, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
 * And where it says "replace these words with your reason", you need to replace the words with your reason -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:02, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
 * He is NOTABLE, read sources, use google!--RussianLiberal (talk) 11:03, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
 * You need to make your case on the article talk page, not here. Anyway, I have made a request that you be given a bit of time to make your claims of importance - you really do need to do that in the article yourself, not expect people to have to Google to find out -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:09, 4 January 2012 (UTC)


 * And someone else has removed the Speedy deletion request now, so you have some time to work on the article -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:11, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
 * WHO DELETED MY USERPAGE

Your user page
I have deleted your user page at User:RussianLiberal, as expressing your wish for the death of someone is not acceptable here - Wikipedia user pages are for assisting in the creation of the encyclopedia, not for promoting violent political viewpoints -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:17, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Actually, sorry, I did that wrong - it was only the original version advocating murder that needed to be deleted, so I have restored the later version with only the original revision now deleted -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:21, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

January 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Alexey Pivovarov. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. '''Please do not remove the Notability tag unless significant new material is added to the article improving its notability evidence. Just leave it there for a while, as it will not result in the deletion of the article without an actual deletion proposal, which you will be able to contest''' -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:50, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

STOP being abusive to other editors, as you have been repeatedly doing, most recently here where you called someone a "wikifreak". You have also, on this page, referred to someone else as "some bastard". This behavior is simply not acceptable, so please take this opportunity to change the way you express yourself before you dig yourself into trouble here -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:44, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Bastard is BOT and I was saying SOME WIKIFREAK CAN... in future. User is abusive... I was banned forever in Russian Wiki 7 times!--RussianLiberal (talk) 13:17, 4 January 2012 (UTC) And before I wrote aboyt 650 articles there.,,--RussianLiberal (talk) 13:20, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm sure you meant no harm, and you were just frustrated over the deletion tags, but nobody has been abusive to you. If you continue to use terms like "bastard" or "wikifreak" here, and you attack or threaten other editors (even in general terms), you will almost certainly end up being blocked - and I don't want to see that happen. If you wish to work on the English Wikipedia (and we welcome people from all countries), then you will need to understand the culture of civility and collegial cooperation that we work under here, and not see disagreements as battles. (And I really wouldn't boast about being banned from Russian Wikipedia ;-) . Anyway, I hope you will take this as friendly advice, and I hope your future here will be a little smoother than things have been so far. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:33, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you, I will do my best--RussianLiberal (talk) 13:37, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I decided to leave Wikipedia. Firstly they did everything to delete my article, then began this copyright nazism. Nobody here respects authors of articles - it is much more comfortable to dictate, delete and question me as if I commited a crime just uploading a foto. Wikipedia is for warning bots and cruel admins, not for people. You need people 1-2 times a year when wikiburacrats ask them for money again.--RussianLiberal (talk) 18:09, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
 * That's a pity; we all spent some time today helping you getting it done within the rules and despite your rude wording etc. The advise by Boing! is actually quite good: disagreements are not battles, they are just ways to get it right and to work together. Just sleep a night over it, and decide if you wish to be a active contributor or a passive spectator; it's up to you. L.tak (talk) 18:17, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry you have made that decision too. There may be legal and cultural differences here, but Wikipedia is bound by the laws of the state of Florida and by US Federal law, which is very strict about copyright - and I gather that copyright law may be somewhat different in Russia. The deletion of that image was in no way an attack on you personally, it was just a necessary step to prevent the Wikimedia Foundation being sued for copyright infringement. As L.tak says, I hope you will reconsider your stance once you have relaxed a little - and for the future, you are always welcome to come over to my Talk page if I can help you in any way -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 18:58, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

image File:Pivovarov1.jpg
Dear RussianLiberal, thanks for uploading the picture of Pivovarov; always good to know how the main person of the page looks like. However, I wonder where you have obtained the picture from? Did you make it yourself? If not, then you should state what was the source and show that it was not copyrighted. I know that's a tricky business, but it should be done to avoid copyright lawsuits against wikipeida. Thanks! L.tak (talk) 15:38, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I knew that there is a shit here with files. Tell me what is better to write to avoid any problems and file deleteon?--RussianLiberal (talk) 17:27, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Well, in general, you should avoid taking images "just from the net", as we can often not assert whether there is copyright. There are exceptions, but with pictures of living people we really need copyright. So if you didn't take it yourself, I suggest you remove the image from the article (and the image itself will be removed automatically in 1 week). If you think there is a chance it is not copyrighted: please right down the source here, and I will give my opinion! L.tak (talk) 17:32, 4 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Thats from net, but photo fron TVset. OF COURSE it is nor copyrighted in Russia!--RussianLiberal (talk) 17:36, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I decided to leave Wikipedia. Firstly they did everything to delete my article, then began this copyright nazism. Nobody here respects authors of articles - it is much more comfortable to dictate, delete and question me as if I commited a crime just uploading a foto. Wikipedia is for warning bots and cruel admins, not for people. You need people 1-2 times a year when wikiburacrats ask them for money again.--RussianLiberal (talk) 18:08, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Pivovarov1.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Pivovarov1.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ukexpat (talk) 17:56, 4 January 2012 (UTC)