User talk:Russiandude987

Dean Delis
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Dean Delis, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://psychiatry.ucsd.edu/faculty/ddelis.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 01:48, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Dean Delis
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Dean Delis, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, Dean Delis appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Dean Delis has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Dean Delis and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Dean Delis with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Dean Delis.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Cunard (talk) 01:50, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Dean Delis
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Dean Delis, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, Dean Delis appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Dean Delis has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Dean Delis and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Dean Delis with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Dean Delis.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Cunard (talk) 03:52, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

Why your page is being deleted
Wikipedia has notability requirements for its articles that may be found here. Among those are the requirement that any article's subject must have received coverage from reliable, third-party sources so that readers can verify that what is written is accurate. I'm afraid that, at least from what I have found in most of the popular search engines, there is not enough sources out there about him to establish his notability. If you do find a reliable source with information, please feel free to recreate the article and add the source. However, just do you know, if you don't do that and you recreate it again, it will most likely get deleted again. Thingg &#8853; &#8855; 04:07, 23 November 2008 (UTC)