User talk:Russianzio

I am sorry, but Pub Crawls in Rome will never survive as a Wikipedia article. I have moved it to your user page. I suggest you add its content to the Wikitravel page on Rome. -- RHaworth 10:53, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

Spam query
In response to your request on my talk page, I have done some more investigation. Here's a first glance at what I've found; I'll continue looking:

Accounts:
 * Multiple ignored warnings to stop adding your links.
 * Multiple ignored warnings to stop adding your links.
 * Multiple ignored warnings to stop adding your links.
 * Multiple ignored warnings to stop adding your links.
 * Multiple ignored warnings to stop adding your links.
 * Multiple ignored warnings to stop adding your links.


 * Multiple ignored warnings to stop adding your links.
 * Multiple ignored warnings to stop adding your links.



Domains:

Some related domains: Google AdSense ID: 2407138955677159

Deleted articles:
 * Colosseum pub crawl
 * Pub Crawls in Rome

Reference: -- A. B. (talk • contribs) 01:35, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Spam/2010 Archive Apr 1


 * So why an adsense code on a site would mean the site is a spam? Please stop this Gistapo thing, this is my activity since 2005!!! We've done a lot of work for the past 5 years, as for the microscopy site i used my personal microscope to take videos of microorganisms interesting to look at. i see you removed the link from "Mosquito page" where there was a link to the video of mosquito head.... It didn't bother anyone and was only adding the value to the content... A.B. you can't sleep well because you think there are spammers around you and you have nightmares. I am fine with your removals, good and clean now, never again i will press the edit button on this site, but still, please remove the spam reports as you are ruining my life here!!!! And how can people be so violent and blood thirsty?


 * AdSense links do not indicate spam content -- we just record them to track common ownership between sites.


 * Your comments here are disingenuous since your talk page records (see the links above) show you've been told numerous times not to add links to your own site. You've had our rules and policies pointed out to you multiple times but made the choice to go ahead anyway. Like it or not, you've driven our response by your own behaviour. -- A. B. (talk • contribs) 14:04, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

Warning re: Legal threat
Your recent edits to MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 22:23, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

April 2010
This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive comments. If you continue to make personal attacks on other people, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. ''Please do not make legal threats to other editors. It is a personal attack, which WILL get you reported to administration if it happens again. Thanks; Paul'' -Pavel (Paul) (talk) 22:24, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

Personal attacks
You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia  as a result of your . You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. OhNo itsJamie Talk 14:59, 28 April 2010 (UTC)