User talk:Rustic/Archive 3

Re: Hello
Nope never used it. Gary King ( talk ) 00:49, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

Hi
Hey, it's a tough job but somebodys got to do it. My rollback feature on Lupin's anti-vandal isn't working (by the time I get to vandalized pages, they're already reverted). So I have discovered new pages and it's good. Sometimes, it's hard to tell whether to delete or not though. Ah well, more kids who think their biographies are of world interest to put right. =] Olly150 22:28, 24 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Well I looked at your anti-vandal edits and saw your lack of recognition for it so I will award you a barnstar for your hardwork. =] Olly150 22:36, 24 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks a lot - my first barnstar. Perfect place for it =] - The code on the barnstar I put on your page is a bit off - I hope you don't mind a few extra parenthesis! Olly150 22:47, 24 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks. I thought I needed a revamp, and different fonts. Something a bit fresher I think. =] Olly150 15:20, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

Mummy 1770
CSD candidate, sure. But an A7 person? Do you really think an article about a mummy without legs is about a real person without claim to notability? gnfnrf (talk) 00:37, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

Do not revert without looking first
MY user talk page should of not of been reverted by you. Secondly, he was wrong in posting the warning becuase he was wrong anyways. In no way is removing a template considored vandalism. You need to make sure you know what you're doing when using an automated tool like twinkle, got it?

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 15:51, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

RE:IP talk pages
No they don't, as IPs have no ownership of right over that talk page. Just revert the IP and if s/he continues then report to WP:AIV and the WP:RFPP to protect the talk page. Cheers,  « Gonzo fan2007 ''(talk)  @ 18:18, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Your welcome, anytime!  « Gonzo fan2007 ''(talk)  @ 00:57, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

Languages?
What was this about? This is clearly English (albeit somewhat technical)... DS (talk) 01:58, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Talk:Jacob tingson
Talk:Jacob tingson, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Talk:Jacob tingson and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Talk:Jacob tingson during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. PoinDexta1 |  Talk to Me  | 08:50, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
 * LOL! Twinkle notified myself. =P PoinDexta1  |  Talk to Me  | 08:51, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

Your NPWatcher application
Dear PoinDexta1,

Thank you for applying for NPWatcher! You've been approved to use it. Before you run the program, please check the changelog on the application page to see if there is a newer release (or just add the main page (here) to your watchlist). Report any bugs or feature suggestion here. If you need help, feel free to contact me or join NPWatcher.

—αἰτίας •'discussion'• 11:12, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

ACC Tool
Someone, probably you, requested access to the account creation tool. For security purposes could you please confirm that it was you who made the request so we can approve you, thanks. —— RyanLupin • (talk) 16:43, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Pictogram voting support.svg|100px|left]] Thank you for applying to access the account creation tool. I have approved your request. You may now access the tool here. Before you do so, please read the tool's guide to familiarize yourself with the process. You may also want to join #wikipedia-en-accounts on irc and/or the mailing list. Keep in mind that the ACC tool is a powerful program, and misuse may result in your access being suspended by a tool administrator. Don't hesitate to get in touch with me if you have any questions. Thank you for your participating in the account creation process.  ·Add§hore·  T alk /C ont 17:23, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

Umm your userpage?
Hi there,

Your userpage seems to be a similar copy to my user page for the what do I do around here section. Could you tell me if this is true? :S

The Helpful  One  Review 22:19, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
 * If you don't mind, please do - or make it a little less like mine! I don't mind if users take bits or ideas from me, but would prefer if they ask and definitely not copy sections of my userpage without my permission! :) The  Helpful  One  Review 22:27, 28 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Strike that, user pages are PD, though I prefer if you tell me when you do it! :D The  Helpful  One  Review 22:28, 28 September 2008 (UTC)


 * It is OK, sorry - you can keep it, I forgot about Public Domain! :) The  Helpful  One  Review 22:30, 28 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Hehe, it doesn't matter - I overreacted! The  Helpful  One  Review 22:34, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

<--Per your request, I went ahead and fixed the problem with your userboxes, regards ——Possum (talk) 22:20, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Re Boo boo
Not a problem mate. Incidentally, I was shocked to discover soon after marking this article CSD that a plane actually did just go down in Newark. Not to say the incident is necessarily notable or encyclopedic, but I thought originally it was completely fake or even a Donnie Darko reference. Eh well.  Flying Toaster  08:19, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

Editor review
Hello, you currently have an Editor review request listed on the main page, although it has failed to gain comments, are you still interested in having it open, if so or if not please acknowledge me of that to make a proper archival of the nomination. Thanks.-- TRU  CO   22:38, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Do you still want it open? If not, I need to archive it per the backlog and its been open past 30 days. If you still want it open, it can remain open for another 2 weeks.-- TRU  CO   01:13, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Okay, done. Sorry for not comments, their is a current recession of reviewers at ER, you are free to nominate another one in the near future. Actually, I'll leave it open for those 2 weeks, it recently just got a comment, that you may want to reply to or take into consideration. If not, you can tell me to archive it.-- ₮RU  ₢0   03:49, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

CSD tag
Hi Poindexta1, hope you don't mind but I've downgraded Peter Harris (buccaneer) from a speedy deletion to a notability tag, because I see the article as containing an assertion of notability and therefore meriting more time to establish whether it should be in Wikipedia. Also I've categorised it which should hopefully bring it to the attention of Wikipedians interested in that area.  Ϣere Spiel  Chequers  11:08, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

New Page Patrol
When I'm patrolling recent changes (I usually patrol newby contributions), the "Mark as patrolled" link doesn't show up. Doesn't that only show up on pages you navigate to from the New Pages Patrol list? If the "new article" template is there, I usually manually delete it when I add a CSD tag (note: usually) --SquidSK (1MC•log) 13:31, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
 * No worries. I check out NPP when RC is slow, or when I'm in the mood to do some rescue work.  I find that if stuff survives RCP long enough to be at the back of the NPP queue, it usually means the RCPers weren't sure whether to CSD it or not, so there might be something of value worth saving.  --SquidSK (1MC•log) 13:36, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

Copyedit Backlog Elimination Drive
Hi, as a member of the Guild of Copy Editors you're hereby notified of and invited to participate in the WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Backlog elimination drives/May 2010. Please help us eliminate the 8,000+ copyedit backlog! Participating editors will receive barnstars and other awards, according to their level of participation. ɳorɑfʈ Talk! 00:09, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

Grab some glory, and a barnstar
Hi, I'd like to invite you to participate in the Guild of Copy Editors July 2010 Backlog Elimination Drive. In May, about 30 editors helped remove the tag from 1175 articles. The backlog is still over 7500 articles, and extends back to the beginning of 2008! We really need your help to reduce it. Copyediting just a couple articles can qualify you for a barnstar. Serious copyeditors can win prestigious and exclusive rewards. See the event page for more information. And thanks for your consideration. ɳorɑfʈ Talk! 15:17, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

GOCE Backlog Elimination Drive Wrap-up
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of The Utahraptor at 22:28, 3 August 2010 (UTC).

Reviewer permission
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. HJ Mitchell &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   15:54, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

GA review page?
Concerning Shriya Saran/GA1: I was trying to point out that the reviewer was also a major contributor. It is confusing to me how the GA review process works, and why that was not the proper place to put my comment. Where should I put it? BollyJeff ||  talk  22:06, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Jarret Myer
Hello PoinDexta1, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Jarret Myer, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Dabomb87 (talk) 03:31, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

KEONG RACUN YOOO
Reff: Dasar kau keong racun Baru kenal eh ngajak tidur Ngomong nggak sopan santun Kau anggap aku ayam kampung Kau rayu diriku Kau goda diriku Kau colek diriku Eh ku takut sekali tanpa basa basi kau ngajak happy happy Eh kau tak tahu malu Tanpa basa basi kau ngajak happy happy

Mulut kumat kemot Matanya melotot Lihat body semok Pikiranmu jorok Mentang-mentang kau kaya Aku dianggap jablay Dasar koboy kucai Ngajak check-in dan santai Sorry sorry sorry jack Jangan remehkan aku Sorry sorry sorry bang Ku bukan cewek murahan

Back to Reff, *, Reff —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fiklisady (talk • contribs) 01:20, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

November 2010 backlog elimination drive update
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of The Utahraptor (talk) at 16:31, 14 November 2010 (UTC).