User talk:Rusty69t

Welcome!

Hello, Rusty69t, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Conor Matthew Mccreedy, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! MikeWazowski (talk) 14:45, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Conor Matthew Mccreedy


A tag has been placed on Conor Matthew Mccreedy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. MikeWazowski (talk) 14:45, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

Removing Speedy at Conor Matthew Mccreedy
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Conor Matthew Mccreedy, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, then you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 19:23, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Conor Matthew Mccreedy. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, then you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's . Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 19:30, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Conor Matthew Mccreedy


A tag has been placed on Conor Matthew Mccreedy, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. MikeWazowski (talk) 21:59, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

July 2011
Hello Rusty69t. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Conor Matthew Mccreedy, you may have a conflict of interest, or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about following the reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * 1) Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * 2) Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
 * 3) Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * 4) Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. MikeWazowski (talk) 22:26, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

Your addition to Conor Matthew Mccreedy has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. A section was copied verbatim from https://www.facebook.com/ConorMccreedyArt?sk=info. MikeWazowski (talk) 03:47, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

Hi I have launched a dispute on the dispute resolution noticeboard I truly hope we can get this issue resolved. ~ User:Rusty69t User talk:Rusty69t

Apparent Copyright theft
Hi I am being accused of copyright theft but none you guys that are supposed to be editors or administrators takes the time to contact the user that you are accusing and telling him/her how he/she can prove to you that they have full permission on any and every thing stated in the article about out Conor Mccreedy.

Please let me know as to what you need from me in order to proof that I have full permission to to use and freely distribute any of the content in the article about Conor Mccreedy. Who must I contact or how to I resolve this issue, this is my first time to add a new article on Wikipedia and I understand that there are certain things that I wasn't aware of when creating this article but am being accused of something I'm not guilty of and now where on this site does it explain how to resolve the issue of being accused of copyright theft.

So please can someone give me a clear explanation about where to go from here so that we can get this issue resolved.

Copyright problem: Conor Matthew Mccreedy
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Conor Matthew Mccreedy, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from https://www.facebook.com/ConorMccreedyArt?sk=info, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Conor Matthew Mccreedy and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Conor Matthew Mccreedy, in your email. See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Conor Matthew Mccreedy with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Conor Matthew Mccreedy. See Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at [ this temporary page]. Leave a note at Talk:Conor Matthew Mccreedy saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Ryan Vesey contribs  17:36, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

Thanks so much for the help and advice.

After allot of effort I was able to get in contact with the person responsible for the content on the link https://www.facebook.com/ConorMccreedyArt?sk=info they have removed the content from their page and have given me full right on their content, and have send an email to permissions at Wikimedia so what would have to happen next in order for my article to be approved I am busy adding the secondary references as requested and would also just like find out in what way is the article written as an advertisement a gone through a lot of biographies on Wikipedia and cant see in any way that my article is any different from others I have seen.

I hope in the future that I would meet all the requirements and criteria upon my first post of a new article, without having to go through all this trouble again.
 * It seems like one editor "has it out for your article". He cannot stand it and has been taking every effort to hurt the article rather than improve it.  Can I ask what your relationship to the subject of the article is?  I would suggest that you take this to the dispute resolution noticeboard. on a side note, please remember to always sign your posts with four tilde's like this ~ Ryan Vesey  contribs  18:31, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

I have no relationship with the subject of the article I am merely a fan of his work and thought he would be the perfect subject for my first contribution on the Wikipedia website and I have gone through a lot of trouble to get all the copyright issues resolved regarding this article and its been a major learning curve and would be a great disappointment if this article is removed after all the trouble I have been through.hope I signed it correctly ~ User:Rusty69t User talk:Rusty69t

Hi Ryan Thanks for the advice and have launched dispute on the dispute resolution noticeboard. ~ User:Rusty69t User talk:Rusty69t

Dispute resolution noticeboard thread
Hi Rusty69t, this is Mr. Stradivarius from the dispute resolution noticeboard. It looks like the experience of writing your first Wikipedia article has been quite stressful! I can sympathise completely with your situation, and I would like to help you sort things out here. There is some advice and a couple of questions for you at the dispute resolution noticeboard, if you want to drop by and comment. I can see that you weren't happy with the behaviour of the other editors involved in the article, but I'm sure that if we come together and talk about this, we can work things out to the satisfaction of everyone involved. All the best. —  Mr. Stradivarius ♫ 13:55, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
McGeddon (talk) 17:08, 4 June 2014 (UTC)