User talk:Rutgersph

Welcome to Wikipedia!
Dear Rutgersph: Welcome to Wikipedia, a free and open-content encyclopedia. I hope you enjoy contributing. To help get you settled in, I thought you might find the following pages useful:


 * Introduction
 * Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * Frequently Asked Questions
 * How do you edit a page?
 * How do you revert to a previous version of a page?
 * What about copyrights?
 * Community Portal

Don't worry too much about being perfect. Very few of us are! Just in case you are not perfect, click here to see how you can avoid making common mistakes.

If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. A third option is to ask a more experienced user such as an administrator.

One last bit of advice: please sign any discussion comment with four tildes ( ~ ). The software will automatically convert this into your signature which can be altered in the "Preferences" tab at the top of the screen. I hope I have not overwhelmed you with information. If you need any help just let me know. Once again welcome to Wikipedia, and don't forget to tell us about yourself and be BOLD! Stifle (talk) 18:05, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

Why did you delete National Center for Women and Families?
Why was this article deleted? I wanted to check the organization because it is recommended by the National Cancer Institute and NIH booklet on breast cancer, linked to the breast cancer article on wikipedia. Is there something wrong with the Center? It seems to be legit. Rutgersph (talk) 17:20, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The article was deleted after a consensus was formed at Articles for deletion/National Research Center for Women & Families that it should be deleted. Stifle (talk) 18:05, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your note, I appreciate it very much. But I was surprised by what you said because looking at the info it doesn't look like a consensus to me.  It looks like a disagreement with some people trying to improve the article by adding references and others saying take it down anyway and then you deleted it.  You didn't explain why it was deleted so that's my question.  Is it a bad organization?  There are lots of health organizations listed on wikipedia that don't seem as well known, so that's probably not the reason.  How can the organization be cited by NIH and National Cancer Institute and not be good enough for wikipedia? That's what I don't understand.  When people see an agency listed in a newspaper they want to know more about it and that's why wikipedia is so helpful, isn't it?
 * Rutgersph (talk) 19:09, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Please note that it is now too late to bring up arguments that should haver been made in the deletion discussion. You will need to consult the deletion discussion to see the reasons why the article was not considered appropriate for Wikipedia.
 * If you feel that I have not followed the deletion process correctly, you can make a request at Deletion review, but this can't be done just because you disagree with the result. Stifle (talk) 19:15, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

I am asking you a question. Not looking to argue with you. I didn't see this before it was deleted. I don't have time to spend on the wikipedia process I am trying to ask a question because the subject matter (breast cancer) matters to me.

Rutgersph (talk) 19:21, 4 October 2009 (UTC)