User talk:Ruthjhendry

Senior Wranglers since 1910
Hello. Thanks for taking an interest in the Senior Wrangler article. I wasn't the editor who anonymously deleted your name from the list (in fact, I reverted one such deletion) but I understand why they did so. The main problem is that statements of this kind need to be supported by a reference to a suitably authoritative source. For pre-1910 Wranglers, this is straightforward, because Venn's Alumni Cantabrigienses contains all the necessary information and is an appropriately scholarly work. But in 1910 the University stopped publishing the class lists in merit order, so it's not only harder to find out the names of the Senior Wranglers from then on, but also there's a general lack of authoritative sources that we can cite.

Many of the names on the list, while doubtless correct, either don't have supporting citations at all, or only have citations to insufficiently authoritative sources. In one case, the reference given was to a self-published source, which when checked didn't actually support the claim, and which has now disappeared entirely. In such cases, Wikipedia policy is clear: the unsupported material may be challenged or deleted without notice (usually I just tag with but some people opt for deletion instead). In your case, the only source currently given is to your LinkedIn profile page, which unfortunately is considered as a self-published source, so if you can suggest a more suitable source then that would be great. I hope this doesn't sound critical or overly fussy. -- Nicholas Jackson (talk) 22:13, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion
This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.158.181.1 (talk) 01:35, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.158.181.1 (talk) 13:48, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, Ruthjhendry, and welcome to Wikipedia!&#32;Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article.&#32;Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or any other editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Chillum 13:55, 7 September 2014 (UTC) thanks for your pleasant message. I don't know how to deal with the editor who is being so unpleasant to me and keeps deleting my edit. I am deeply, deeply upset by what he has done, and how he has treated me, which is my definition of harassment, and now he is just trying to make it worse. What can I do? Can anyone help?
 * The plain and simple conflict of interest guide
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Hi Ruthjhendry and I'm sorry you seem to be encountering problems. I'm going to check into this and get back to you very soon. Best, Philg88 ♦talk 16:07, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
 * OK I've done some checking. It appears that there is a disagreement over the content of the article Senior Wrangler (University of Cambridge). As has been explained elsewhere, all material in the encyclopedia must be based on verifiable reliable sources. This is a pillar of Wikipedia policy so I'm sorry, but there is nothing I can really do to help you. On a brigher note, it looks as though a couple of editors may be willing to help you verify the information that you want to add to the article. Good luck! Philg88 ♦talk 16:30, 7 September 2014 (UTC)