User talk:Ruzbehraja

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. OhNo itsJamie Talk 21:40, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place  after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! -SpuriousQ (talk) 09:37, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

License tagging for Image:Casestudytax.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Casestudytax.gif. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 15:05, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Re: Indu Shahani
See Talk:Indu Shahani =Nichalp   «Talk»=  16:18, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

Wassup
Hey Ruzbeh, Rishi Tandon here. Nice to see another wikipedian :)

Mikeslackenerny (talk)

heh heh, yeah.. 3 yrs back. Now at IIMK

Mikeslackenerny (talk)

AfD nomination of Parsi Characters in bollywood movies
I have nominated Parsi Characters in bollywood movies, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Parsi Characters in bollywood movies. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 16:40, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Natalie Di Luccio


A tag has been placed on Natalie Di Luccio, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you.  Ol Yeller Talktome 12:35, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

A page you started has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Mustansir Barma, Ruzbehraja!

Wikipedia editor Pjposullivan just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Thank you for that article. Just reviewed it. Cheers."

To reply, leave a comment on Pjposullivan's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Deletion pending for File:Chaitanya Gavali Profile.jpg
Hello, Ruzbehraja. Some time ago, a file you uploaded &mdash; File:Chaitanya Gavali Profile.jpg &mdash; was tagged with OTRS pending, indicating that you (or perhaps the copyright holder if you did not create this image) submitted a statement of permission to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. Though there is often a backlog processing messages received at this address, we should have received your message by now.


 * If you have not submitted (or forwarded) a statement of permission, please send it immediately to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.


 * If you have already sent this message, it is possible that there was a problem receiving it. Please re-send it to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

If we don't hear from you within one week, the file will be deleted. If we can help you, please feel free to ask at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 14:48, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Chaitanya Gavali for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chaitanya Gavali is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Chaitanya Gavali until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. PRehse (talk) 12:27, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

Khan Sahib
What was your reasoning behind this edit?. You should leave an edit summary particularly if reverting good faith edits. Your edit has reintroduced formatting errors, introduced too many images for the article size and has re-introduced names that aren't verified by reliable sources. These articles cannot become lists of random, unverified names like they have before. Woody (talk) 17:19, 26 May 2020 (UTC)