User talk:Rwarner1956

Welcome!

Hello, Rwarner1956, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ~, which will automatically produce your name and the date.
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome!

– Fayenatic  L ondon 11:12, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

Atlanta tv history
I noticed that you listed several interviews that you conducted yourself (at least, they were conducted by Richard Warner--a name very similar to your user name) as references for this article. Unfortunately, according to Wikipedia's policy on original research {WP:OR), interviews/research you've done yourself cannot be used as a source for articles. Since you haven't cited which specific parts of the article are based on your original research, I think it would be easier if you added citations for facts in the body of the article, leaving out what could not be referenced.  You've also listed something articles from a publication over a several year span as references at the bottom of the article.  Is there any way you could be more specific?  The ideal is for other editors to be able to find the sources you've listed, and listing articles from 1948-1954 (not sure if this is the exact span, but it is something like that) is not all that helpful.  Please see WP:ATT for more information on Wikipedia's attibution policies and let me know if you have any questions.  Thanks ! janejellyroll 00:56, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

Nomination of Richard T. Warner for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Richard T. Warner is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Richard T. Warner (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Fayenatic  L ondon 11:12, 19 February 2020 (UTC)