User talk:Rwbloomfield

Bedlington Terriers
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your recent changes to the Bedlington Terriers F.C. article are contrary to the cited sources, i.e. the history on the club website. If you want to changed sourced information, you need to provide a new (and reliable) source to support your changes. Making changes to sourced material without changing the source give the appearance of being vandalism. Thanks, Number   5  7  23:04, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Also, if you are the club press officer, then please be aware that you have a WP:Conflict of interest with the club, and are therefore advised to avoid editing its article. If you would like any changes made to the article, please suggest them on the article's talk page (together with a source for the changes). Cheers, Number   5  7  23:09, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

Club history
The website is wrong. The history in the club programme is written by me and is correct. I am afraid you are wrong but you seem to want your errors to be compounded by Wikipedia. Rwbloomfield (talk) 23:10, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

Club history
I am happy to leave the errors and pint out in the media that Wikipedia is not only wrong but refuses to correct the errors. Rwbloomfield (talk) 23:12, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
 * The 'errors' can be corrected if you provide a reliable source that states differently. Or, if you are involved with the club, you can get the club website corrected, and in turn the article can also be. Number   5  7  23:13, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

Club history
This is intriguing. I have spent many hours researching the club history as Wikipedia is wrong. Someone who has NO idea about the club decides that the incorrect history should stay. Why don't stay away from a club you know nothing about? No wonder no credence can be placed on Wikipedia for its accuracy. Rwbloomfield (talk) 23:24, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
 * You can change the article if you provide citations for the facts you are changing. Until you do so, the article has to use the next best source it can, which in this case is the club website. We cannot simply take someone's word that they are right – that would be a real problem for Wikipedia's credence. Please read WP:Verifiability. Number   5  7  23:26, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Also, it's a bit silly (in the scheme of things) to criticise Wikipedia when the club apparently can't even get its history correct on it's own website. Number   5  7  23:28, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

March 2019
Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on User talk:Rwbloomfield. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. &ensp;talk 23:37, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

Newspaper source
Thanks for the source – I have amended the article. I'm sorry if you're annoyed about this, but please understand that Wikipedia cannot just take your word for something – you actually have to provide a source for information, especially if it's something that contradicts another source that should be reliable, such as the club's own website. Number  5  7  23:38, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

My account
Please delete my account. I don't want to be associated with Wikipedia as it is patently wrong. Rwbloomfield (talk) 23:38, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Accounts cannot be deleted I'm afraid. Please see Username policy. Number   5  7  23:39, 22 March 2019 (UTC)