User talk:Rwelean/sandbox3

Review of the sources used in the draft article
Here's my quick review of the sources used in the draft article as of today with regard to whether they can be used to establish Notability. First, a list of the references as of right now (numbered for ease in discussing them):

Now, addressing whether they can be used to establish notability:
 * 1) ❌ This is an interview, and interviews can not generally be used to establish notability since they are considered "first person".
 * 2) ❌ Written/published by the subject of the article.
 * 3) ❌ Passing mention in an announcement about an event.
 * 4) ❌ Written/published by the subject of the article.
 * 5) ❌ Written/published by the subject of the article.
 * 6) ❌ Duplicate reference to #4
 * 7) ❌ Written/published by the subject of the article.
 * 8) ❌ Written/published by the subject of the article.
 * 9) ❌ Written/published by the subject of the article.
 * 10) ❌ Passing mention in an article about an event.
 * 11) ✅ Third-party discussion of the article subject receiving an AML Award.

Hope that helps. ··· 日本穣 ·  投稿  · Talk to Nihonjoe ·  Join WP Japan ! 19:46, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you. Rwelean (talk) 20:45, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

Putting down quill
Thanks for letting me integrate some of the recent sources! Feel free to reject any of my stylistic sentence edits, not sure if those amounted to anything.

Also not sure if this has to go back through AfC. If coverage in the Salt Lake Tribune, Deseret News, and Daily Herald don't equate to notability then RIP to little old Utah and all it produces. MossAlbatross (talk) 03:29, 4 August 2023 (UTC)