User talk:Rxeno

Welcome
Hi, Rxeno. Welcome to Wikipedia!

I hope you like it here and decide to stick around. If you see something on Wikipedia that you want to change, just press the edit button and change it!

For the basic principles, see the five pillars of Wikipedia. And if you're ready to make some edits, this Wikipedia cheatsheet may come in handy.

Cheers, ChzzBot IV (talk) 16:41, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation


I noticed your submission in Articles for creation, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Guy Schwartz. Thanks! It will be reviewed by a volunteer soon.

Before it can be added to Wikipedia, your submission should have references. All articles on Wikipedia should have inline, numbered references after facts, showing the 'reliable source' (a newspaper, book, etc.) where the information can be checked, so that all information is verifiable.

Here's an example of how to add references: Chzz is 98 years old.&lt;ref> "The book of Chzz", Aardvark Books, 2009. &lt;/ref>

He likes tea.&lt;ref> Smith, John. " Interview with Chzz", Foo News, 1 April 2010. Retrieved 2011-05-22.

== References ==

That makes the references automatically display as small numbers[1] which will link to the details in the section titled == References == at the end. You can see that example in action here.

Please add references to your submission, which will be reviewed as soon as possible. See also, Referencing for beginners. If you need any help, just put at the end of this page, followed by a question or get into our live help chat chanel at.

Best, ChzzBot IV (talk) 16:41, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for submitting an article to Wikipedia. Your draft submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted. Please take a look and respond if possible. If there is no response within seven days, the request may be declined. If this happens, please feel free to continue to work on the article. You can resubmit it when you believe the concerns have been addressed. (To resubmit the submission, add the text   to the top of the page)
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, you can use the edit button at the top of the article, near the search bar
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Help desk or the [ reviewer's talk page]. Alternatively you can ask a reviewer questions via live help
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Alpha_Quadrant    (talk)  17:35, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via live help, or on the [ reviewer's talk page]
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Alpha_Quadrant   (talk)  15:52, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Guy Schwartz, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Biglulu (talk) 01:54, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Speedy deletion nomination of Robert Xeno


A tag has been placed on Robert Xeno requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. TheLongTone (talk) 13:37, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

October 2014
Please do not write or add to an article about yourself. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to an existing article about yourself, please propose the changes on its talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was my page deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss it with the deleting administrator. Thank you. Alexf(talk) 15:27, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 4)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Rxeno/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister  talk  06:17, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Maria Devigili


The article Maria Devigili has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one.  J eth R oad the F act B oy 07:13, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Maria Devigili for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Maria Devigili is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Maria Devigili until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. happy days, LindsayHello 14:37, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

Gathering current newspaper, online magazine, and radio documentation to support this article.

Maria Devigili
I see you have made some edits and additions to the article; great! I haven't had time yet to look at them and see if i need to change my belief that the article should be deleted; i will do so. In the meantime, i'd like to suggest that you strike through the personal attacks it looks as though you made on the AfD. You say this user LindsayH and this reviewer has some issues that need to be ironed out as well as claiming i initiated the AfD in some kind of revenge action. None of this is either true or acceptable here in the community-driven environment. I would appreciate you acknowledging that and not making further attacks; happy days, LindsayHello 06:19, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

Hi thanks yes Ill add about 5 or 6 more new current links etc and some more radio and newspaper tomorrow. I will go edit it explain it yes happy to. Sorry about that, bad judgement on my part and I apologize. I received this at the same time an FB attack was launched against Ms Devigili. Happy to make amends. Is there somewhere I need to address it further? thank you New Radio and other links coming together today.

Most current Maria's decade long journey from singing in the streets to her present is noted and well known in Italy. I will be happy to continue to add as many clearly defined references as necessary.

Regards rxeno


 * I don't think you quite understand. I appreciate, i really do, the work you've put in, but you have to accept that we follow certain policies and procedures; one of them is that we don't have articles about just anyone, they have to meet certain requirements, they need to be notable to a certain level.  I suggest you look at WP:MUSICBIO, which will give you an idea of what we look for to show a musician's notability; and  i think you'll see that Devigili doesn't meet the requirements.
 * On a different note, thank you for removing your poorly thought out words; i understand how frustrating it can be to have something you've worked on deleted or requested to be deleted, so i'm not holding a grudge. But do remember, as long as you stay here, which i hope will be a long time, that we don't allow personal attacks ~ WP:NPA is all about that.  Take care, happy days, LindsayHello 16:28, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for your comments. Maria Devigili is on television, news print, radio, online news and radio, and has won awards and been a participant in many Italian music events. I believe she her career adn article do meet the requirements. Please re-look. I am writing more of a story for the entries now. It will have a more wikipedia read. Take a day or two.

How is it that a musician struggling in a foreign country stuck here for carona virus for 6 months and still she releases a song and the press and media immediately pick it up. Perhaps you dont know her but I assure you her thousands of Italian followers do. She is fighting for feminism in Italy. Its time to wipe the male BS plate clean. Women are treated horribly in Italy. Maria is in the middle of the feminist movement and will champion freedom and respect for Italian women. Her American page will support her Italian version and will grow this year as she attempts to get back home. rxeno 05:09, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

Update I have the list fromthis WP:MUSICBIO, I will supply fulfillment of all but uit looks like only 2 are not supported by her career. Every other line is supported in multiple ways. Update later today thank you. rxeno 05:20, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Maria Devigili, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marica ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Maria_Devigili check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Maria_Devigili?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:20, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 18
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Maria Devigili, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Maria ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Maria_Devigili check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Maria_Devigili?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C

 * You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. 

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:10, 2 May 2024 (UTC)