User talk:Rxlx

March 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to White House Farm murders, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place " " on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: White House Farm murders was changed by Rxlx (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.90655 on 2012-03-29T20:35:56+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:35, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Manifest determination


A tag has been placed on Manifest determination, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia for multiple reasons. Please see the page to see the reasons. If the page has since been deleted, you can ask me the reasons by leaving a message on my user talk page.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Widefox (talk) 08:56, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

April 2012
Thank you for your recent contributions, such as Manifest determination. Getting started creating new articles on Wikipedia can be tricky, and you might like to try creating a draft version first, which you can then ask for feedback on if necessary, with less risk of speedy deletion. Do make sure you also read help available to you, including Your First Article and the Tutorial. You might also like to try the Article Wizard, which has an option to create a draft version. Thank you. Widefox (talk) 09:01, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Hello
Hi, it seems up until now that all your edits have been reverted. Why not ask another editor to give you some help so your contributions are successful? Widefox (talk) 09:26, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Why don't the Wiki fascists leave my edits alone as the increase th eknwoledge base which is the basic idea of Wiki? If my edit upsets someone's preciousness that is a problem for Wiki to address as otherwise Wiki = Hitlerism. My Manifest determination was deleted by the homosexual clique at CAMH so that is acceptable to Wiki? My previous edit of Liquorice poisoning deleted by the prissy original post but he incorporated my edit which is a bit deeitful isn't it? Is that the essence of Wikiism?

Proposed deletion of Manifest determination


The article Manifest determination has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * 1. notability 1.1 no indication, 1.2 no ref for term (even though link does contain it) 2. might be dictionary article 3. I have no WP:CRYSTAL

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Widefox (talk) 20:07, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

June 2012
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Maxim Petrov. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Theroadislong (talk) 10:30, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

September 2012
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to King's Cross fire. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Kristian 11:05, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Small minded and ignorant Wiki contributors.
It seem sto me that th eoriginal noble aims of the founders have gone adrift due to the smallminded pettyness of many contributors.

They usually manifest this smallminded ignorance by deleting any correction to their original articles as seemingly their godliness means the are the supreme authority on most topics even if as is the frequent case they live in some little place in USA ad have no real knowledge of life beyond the stripmalls.

Constant ingestion of burgers and fries makes them feel to be experts on all things even those of which they know nothing and have n personal experience of. Thus when I spot an inconsitency in their pieces and add some correct and especially logical words to their precious piece they get their knickers in a twist and childishly erase my effort and thus leave all other Wiki readers just as ignorant as they themselves.

This is Fascism and more fitting to Hitler's Germany or Stalin's Russia that the wide world of today.

I will nevertheless continue to add, subtract or otherwise modify and improve various Wiki articles I find as part of my conviction that eductaion should be progressive not regressive.

March 2014
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Halifax Gibbet. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators can block users from editing if they repeatedly vandalize. Thank you. Eric  Corbett  16:26, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

A charming dear fellow named Corbett Who enjoyed the occasional sherbet Was so fucking superior To those much inferior He eventually entered an orbit

July 2014
Hello, I'm J3Mrs. I noticed that you made a comment that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia needs people like you and me to collaborate, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. J3Mrs (talk) 20:48, 30 July 2014 (UTC) You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for creation of an attack page at User:Rxlx/sandbox; competency issues; personal attacks. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Diannaa (talk) 01:57, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

It seems to me that I was right is stating that some Wiki contributors are small minded little tyrants who resent anyone who knows more and better than themselves and who feel duty bound to correct them.

I see one of the posts that upset you is my copying Corbetts quote of fellatio yet you allowed Corbett to state and restate this childish lavatory humour. Unblock me immediately and get a grown up life.