User talk:Rxshilll

Welcome!
Hello, Rxshilll, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page KLM did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. Jetstreamer $Talk$ 12:12, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

You can go on klm's blog page and search for Mauritius. You'll get the results! Rxshilll (talk) 14:42, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Blogs are not reliable sources.--Jetstreamer $Talk$ 19:59, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

April 2020
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to Air Mauritius, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 12:19, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

Yes its a mistake 😫 Rxshilll (talk) 12:22, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Air Mauritius, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Jetstreamer $Talk$ 20:36, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

May 2020
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Sir Seewoosagur Ramgoolam International Airport, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Jetstreamer $Talk$ 16:59, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at List of accidents and incidents involving airliners by location, you may be blocked from editing. Jetstreamer $Talk$ 12:00, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

March 2021
Hello, I'm Paper9oll. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Air Mauritius—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks.  — Paper9oll  (📣 • 📝)  12:33, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

April 2021
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Sir Seewoosagur Ramgoolam International Airport. Jetstreamer $Talk$ 11:49, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Warning
Please do not edit war as you have on Sir Seewoosagur Ramgoolam International Airport, if your addition has been challenged then you need t0 make a case for it on the related talk page. If you continue to edit war then you may be blocked from editing, thanks. MilborneOne (talk) 08:36, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
 * The incorrect behaviour is kept up, and with a degree of insistence. I concur with the earlier warnings: please stop revert warring, and please stop improper additions. If anyone blocks your account, or requests such a block, they will have my full support. Jan olieslagers (talk) 11:30, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

May 2021
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Sir Seewoosagur Ramgoolam International Airport. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Jetstreamer $Talk$ 11:46, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptively ignoring community concerns voiced on this page here.. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 07:14, 8 May 2021 (UTC)