User talk:RyFluker

Speedy deletion nomination of MMOTHS


A tag has been placed on MMOTHS requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Kinu t/c 18:52, 30 October 2012 (UTC)


 * See WP:MUSICBIO for what a musical performer needs to have achieved before having a Wikipedia article. JohnCD (talk) 19:53, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of MMOTHS for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article MMOTHS is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/MMOTHS until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. § FreeRangeFrog 23:28, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

NPOV
Hi RyFluker! As Wikipedia is an informative encyclopaedia, content must be verified by reliable sources and must be written from a neutral point of view. As such, I and other editors have edited MMOTHS in an attempt to ensure the article is written in a way that does not sounds like an advertisement for the subject. Please let me know if you need any assistance with any of these guidelines / policies in the future. Alternatively, you can seek assistance at the Neutral-point-of-view noticeboard. Cheers, Stalwart 111  (talk) 03:37, 5 November 2012 (UTC).

Proposed deletion of He's My Brother She's My Sister


The article He's My Brother She's My Sister has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Doesn’t meet WP:N. Only interview and blog coverage, a search didn’t turn up any reliable secondary coverage."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ruth Bader Yinzburg (talk) 01:25, 9 June 2024 (UTC)