User talk:Ryan032/Archive2

Thanks
Thank you for reverting the vandalism to my user page, much appreciated. &mdash;Noah 18:14, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
 * No problem :)  Dadude3320  20:16, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Untitled Message
Im really not sure how to message i dont know if this is how but i just wanted to ask you if you get paid to revert all the vandalism? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Damonmon (talk • contribs) 02:28, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Hi, Everything on wikipedia is free, the content is free, and contributing is free too. No one here gets paid to do anything it's "Volunteer" work. Dadude3320  14:49, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Take That websites!
Hi there, Okay for years there has been many TT related websites on their page. All have been removed except one. I keep putting Garys back and its being removed. Why is that ? Gary is perfectly happy with the site and its Take That related! What are we all doing wrong ? Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.26.194.120 (talk) 18:54, 18 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The link was removed for two reasons. I primarily reverted because of the fact you added a little "Stop removing this link and get a life" comment, as well as the fact that Wikipedia is NOT a Collection of links And is NOT a Soapbox. -- Dadude3320  19:28, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

That comment was made after our site was removed at least 20 times in the last 4 months and with no explanation! Everyone thinks its a rogue fan removing them all. At no time has anybody ever said links aren't permitted on here. Many other TT related pages on wikipedia have full lists of links. Many thanks for that explanation though. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.26.194.120 (talk) 23:07, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
 * People tend to remove fansite links as it seems more like advertising then a "Contribution" to the page. Try bringing up this issue on the article's talk page. Explain why you think it should be there. -- Dadude3320  23:21, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

WP:DEFCON
"Children At Play." I lol'd. :P -- slakr \ talk / 20:59, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Took me 30 min to think that one up :P  Dadude3320  21:31, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Huggle User Category
Hi there. I have seen that you use huggle by the fact that you have automatically updated the huggle white list(it does this when closing huggle). I was wondering if you would add the category to your user page so that it fills out and we know who actually uses huggle. If you do not want to you do not have to. I am also sorry if i have already talked to you about this or you no longer use huggle but i sent it to everyone that has edited the page since mid January. I hope we can start to fill out this category. If you would like to reply to this message then please reply on my talk page as i will probably not check here again. Thanks.  ·Add§hore·  T alk /C ont 18:27, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Huggle Category Problem
Hi there.You are receiving this message from me as you have not added your huggle category correctly. At the moment on category here you can see that you are sorted under the letter U. To fix this please change the   to   . This will fix the problem. If you do not change this within a few days then i will do this for you but i would prefer to send you a message like this than just go and change your page. If you want to contact me then please use my talk page as i will not be checking back here. Thanks for your help.  ·Add§hore·  T alk /C ont 16:47, 6 March 2008 (UTC) -- Dadude3320  23:45, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to VandalProof!
Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Dadude3320! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. A le_Jrb talk 07:50, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

RE
Hello there, I recently noticed you have been using the   template. I largely created the template, so I just wated to offer some advice. Try not to overuse the template, like here. Generally, one use is enough. Also, you probably shouldn't mention the fact you "clerk" on AIV. Not many admins are quite fond of that. I'm not an admin personally. And, you probably shouldn't metion the fact that vandalising your pages will get people warned/blocked. While it may be true, you're really telling them not to stuff beans up their nose, if you know what I mean. Feel free to ask me a question about this. Cheers. Steve Crossin  (talk)   (anon talk)  21:39, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the message. I've re-worded my userpage, and I'll keep in mind what you said about the AIV template. I very much appreciate your input. Have a great day :)  Dadude3320  21:45, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

No problem. You might want to remove the last line from your welcome message to this talk page. Same thing, stuffing beans. And, I'm happy to know that you're a reformed vandal. Goes to show that vandals can be reformed, unlike what some people currently think. I think otherwise, and I thank you for helping to prove my point. Feel free to send me a message at any time, and I will be more than happy to help you out. Cheers, Steve Crossin   (talk)   (anon talk)  21:56, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Untitled message
why did you vandalise? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 04aeverington (talk • contribs) 07:43, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
 * I vandalised as part of a little game I and some others were playing on a forum. However, after looking at my contribs after I had finished vandalising I had found that it was a VERY childish and immature thing for me to do. So I decided to devote my time on wikipedia, to HELPING it by removing the vandalisim, rather then creating vandalisim and attempting to destroy someone elses hard work.  Dadude3320  15:59, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

User talk:99.141.84.209
I just looked over the above page, you have issued the User a Level 1, the post was blatantly vandalism. Do you think something a little more would have been appropriate? Just a thought! (Keep up the good work btw). I haven't managed to graqb many vandalised pages as people get there before me! Lukeyboyuk (talk) 23:28, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
 * To be honest with you, I was rushing through 4 or 5 vandal edits I had to look through, because I had to get off the computer to deal with something. You are correct though, a higher warning level would have been appropriate. I would normally issue a more stern level 2,or 3 warning to the user. Thanks for your input and concern. :) And good luck with the vandalism patrol! -- Dadude3320  00:48, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

hey yeah u reverted my stuff and im not happy u have no right whatsoever to tell me what i can say!!!!! Helooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo      ever hear of the constitution!!!! FREEDOM OF SPEECH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 * Yes, I have heard of freedom of speech. However, Wikipedia (or any website for that matter) has the right to edit/remove text. Yes, you can *say* anything you want, but this doesn't apply to websites. -- Dadude3320  23:18, 11 October 2008 (UTC)