User talk:RyanAl6

Welcome to WikiProject Amusement Parks
Hello RyanAl6,

I see that you joined WikiProject Amusement Parks via the Participants page! I wanted to personally welcome you! I saw that you checked a tick on the Universal Parks task force. If you are seeking out additional resources, I recommend checking out the Task Force page, or check out the Wikipedia Library (namely Newspapers.com or ProQuest) which may aid in research if you are thinking about improving one of our many articles. If you have any questions or concerns, drop a post on the Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Amusement Parks where we'd be happy to help assist you. Again, welcome to the WikiProject! :)

All the best. Adog ( Talk ・ Cont ) 03:53, 20 August 2023 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the welcome. As a universal fan I’ve already been working on various related pages before even realizing there was a specific task force for this. I’ll check out the to do list. RyanAl6 (talk) 13:13, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Club Wyndham Bonnet Creek


Hello, RyanAl6. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Club Wyndham Bonnet Creek".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 19:47, 7 March 2024 (UTC)

Disney adjacent properties
I wanted to draw your attention to this:
 * Bonnet Creek Resort is a 70-acre (28 ha) development in the southeast corner of Walt Disney World. The land, which is not owned by Disney...

Furthermore, while these hotels appear on the Disney map, when you look up the listing of resorts, they do not appear. -- RickyCourtney (talk) 20:06, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

Thanks
For this. And other edits. English is not my native language, and I do not always understand such features;) — Werter1995 (talk) 18:05, 8 June 2024 (UTC)


 * No worries man. I'll keep watching the article and make any changes if you need it. RyanAl6 (talk) 21:14, 8 June 2024 (UTC)

Source at Inverted roller coaster
Just wanted to mention that the source you cited in this edit wouldn't likely pass the reliability test. That page looks like a self-published source to me, which are generally considered unreliable by Wikipedia's standards. The rare exception is when the author/publisher is a subject-matter expert whose work has been published in reliable, independent publications. I couldn't find an "About" page to learn more about the author, so doubtful that's the case here. I recommend replacing that source with a better one. --GoneIn60 (talk) 20:13, 10 June 2024 (UTC)


 * I see. I pulled the source from the article for the coaster itself, which is already a GA, so I just assumed it was good. I'll see if I can find alternatives for both articles. RyanAl6 (talk) 20:16, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Ah, yes that source does appear to have been in the article back in this 2012 version when it was promoted. Of course, GA reviews aren't too stringent and only involve 1 reviewer, so it might have been overlooked. Also the reviewer in this GA review wasn't too familiar with coasters and their sources to begin with. So yeah, in a nutshell, I wouldn't put too much stock into a GA review, although I completely understand now why you made that assumption. Cheers! -- GoneIn60 (talk) 21:49, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Found you one that's pretty close. I would cite this one from the Sandusky Register as a complementary source, which confirms most of the same claims and would allow you to keep the other source. The only thing I would be careful of is the way you phrased, "facilitating the inclusion of". Neither source really says that the expanded length of the ride allowed for elements like the cobra roll, although we assume that to be true. Might want to consider dropping that from the text, thanks. --GoneIn60 (talk) 01:40, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Thank you much for going through the effort to find that source. I'll add it in and rephrase that sentence. RyanAl6 (talk) 02:32, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
 * You are very welcome! THANK YOU as well for helping to improve amusement park related articles! WP:APARKS can always use the extra help! -- GoneIn60 (talk) 02:44, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
 * No problem! What can I say – amusement parks are fun to write about. RyanAl6 (talk) 02:59, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

Saltburn
Thanks for your edits, but you really need to give a chap chance to check his work when it goes live. MartinOjsyork (talk) 19:47, 14 July 2024 (UTC)


 * My bad. I'll back off :) RyanAl6 (talk) 19:51, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
 * To be honest, you haven't done anything out of order. All quite necessary.
 * I'm just a bit rattled as I have a chap consistently editing and replacing my work.
 * And making a mess.
 * Best wishes
 * MartinOjsyork (talk) 19:55, 14 July 2024 (UTC)