User talk:RyanGerbil10/Archive 12

Please imagine a different catchy song:


 * Believe it or not, this page is archived,
 * Please leave a meesage at this page
 * Scream all you want, but I'll never hear,
 * 'cause I'm not here-
 * Believe it or not, it's archived!

Vonnegut's death
Even though your reading of the rules is correct, I still think his death needs to be mentioned. There was agreement at WP:ITN/C that his death may be significant enough to merit inclusion on the main page. Also, we're starting to get readers questioning Wikipedia's silence on the issue here and here. I think this is a case of WP:IAR, we've got someone who although they didn't die in an unusual or tragic manner, was clearly extremely important... RyanGerbil10 (Упражнение В!) 17:11, 12 April 2007 (UTC)


 * This is not an unusual or unprecedented situation. Whenever an iconic figure dies under ordinary circumstances, people unfamiliar with ITN's purpose (as well as some who are overcome with emotion) are shocked and appalled to see that his/her death isn't mentioned.  I disagree that it would improve or maintain Wikipedia to appease such individuals by bowing to systemic bias (the fact that Vonnegut was very famous and popular among Americans and other English speakers) and including an item pertaining to an ineligible occurrence warranting a one-sentence article update.  —David Levy 17:27, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

Deletion request
Hi. Normally I'd just add a "db" tag, but since these two are connected, let me tell you about them here. Ioan Adrian Teaha you'd previously deleted on the 11th but was re-created three days later. Social corruption, as far as I can tell (unreferenced), is just something he came up with. Thank you for your consideration. Biruitorul 02:53, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
 * No problem - thank you. Biruitorul 02:58, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for April 16th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:32, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

My RfA
Hi and thank you for your support on my recent request for adminship. Unfortunately, the request failed, however I aim to improve the concerns that were brought up and hopefully bring myself up to the standards of admin. Once again, I thank you for your support. -- Kz Talk • Contribs 12:27, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

My RfA


Hello, thank you for supporting my RfA! I was promoted with a final tally of 68/12/0. Also, please wish a Happy Birthday to Her Majesty the Queen. Vivat Regina!

TeckWiz's RFA
Hey RyanGerbil10. Thanks for supporting my unsuccessful RFA this week under my old name, TeckWiz. I'm now known simply as User:R. I hope to keep helping and improving Wikipedia alongside you. -- TeckWiz is now R Parlate Contribs@(Let's go Yankees!) 15:09, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

Deletion Review on Template:2007 NL Wild Card Standings
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Template:2007 NL Wild Card Standings. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Michael Greiner 03:38, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for April 23rd, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:00, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

casualties of pkk conflict template
if the result was no consensus, why was it removed? denizTC 12:42, 24 April 2007 (UTC)


 * I remember seeing no consensus there. I guess I should not edit much when I am sleepy. denizTC 21:40, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Deletion of AESA RMIT AEROSPACE ASSOCIATION
Not sure how WP feels about user-talk pages, but that page you deleted is also cloned at User:Aesa-aerospace and User:Rmitaerospace (not sure if they intended to recreate it if it got deleted, or AingGF they just wanted to post it in "many places" to get the word out. DMacks 01:45, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

Delete of Frigtard
I have been trying for about an hour to figure out how to nominate for deletion the word "frigtard" that redirects to the NRA, but I am not sure what I should do. Can you delete it like you did the article on "frigtarded".

Edited to add: Thanks for the help.

Dougdeal 20:12, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

Delete of Controlling of Projects
Hallo, please make your decision about deleting of CoP reconsider.

Notability voting is maked to hasty and therefore with exactly false impression and with that result as done. Almost all votes are argued with absence of reliable sources or external links. I maked this later, but majority of voters make the vote and no more look to the voting. Hm ? Some of external links I later added was for example, Novell, some university websites, etc.

I know, admins have no time and must quickly make decisions ( Finally I'm one admin too :) ). Many decision about notability was correct, but this was wrong.

Please, undelete this article and his talk page.

Thanks, --Kaster 09:24, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

All India Federation of Organisations of Democratic Rights
Please undelete the article All India Federation of Organisations of Democratic Rights. Note that the source of the text, www.marxists.org, is public domain. --Soman 14:03, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

Re: Speedy delete of CoP
Thanks! I try to organise that. --Kaster 09:11, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
 * What you mean about the article now? Bether? I will to ensure deleting again :). --Kaster 07:56, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

Re: Removal of CSD tag on Air Peru
Dear RyanGerbil10,

My name is Thor, and I am the user who tagged Air Peru for speedy deletion. The user who created the article, was making the article sound like an advertisement for the company, and as the tag clearly states, if he had any objections, he should have placed on the page, and then listed his reason on the articles talk page.

Unlike the templates, you must not remove CSD tags from articles without discussing the issue first. The only people who can remove CSD tags from an article are an administrator, when they make the decision whether or not to delete a tagged article, or the user who put such a tag there in the first place.

My decision still stands that the article looks like an advert for a company, and it also falls as being extremely short. I intend to retag the article again, and I would ask you please not to remove the CSD tag again. You may disagree with it, but say why on the talk page rather than removing things that you should not! Thor Malmjursson 22:41, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for April 30th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:46, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for May 7th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:37, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Template:Silly
Please see my comments at the article talk page. Cheers --Dweller 15:24, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for May 14th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 03:27, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:Prince George BC-flag.png
I see that you licensed this municipal flag as a non-free image. Should it be changed to a free image, with the correct license for flags? --Jordan Elder talk 00:26, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Here you go. It was with AWB. Jordan Elder  talk 01:07, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for May 21st, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:38, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Template:AustralianMorningNewsShowsat6
Why was it deleted? There was no consensus or real valid criteria for deletion? - Mike Beckham 05:36, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Category for Smash Bros Brawl
Just to let you know, the category has been listed for CfD [|here]. Currently there's no consensus on that. --myselfalso 16:06, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

TfD
Thank you. I'll drop you a line when the last template is ready. -- Avi 02:31, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Colbert template TFD
While working on another template from the same day's log, I noticed you had deleted the two subtemplates Template:Colbert Report boards/item and Template:Colbert Report boards/Fantasies item, but that Template:Colbert Report boards itself is still around.

Regards, Serpent&#39;s Choice 11:26, 27 May 2007 (UTC)