User talk:RyanGerbil10/Archive 8

Please imagine a different catchy song:


 * Believe it or not, this page is archived,
 * Please leave a meesage at this page
 * Scream all you want, but I'll never hear,
 * 'cause I'm not here-
 * Believe it or not, it's archived!

Signpost updated for October 30th.


You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:28, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

Closing TfD discussion - note added to template talk page?
Hi there. As mentioned at this WP:AN thread, I was wondering if you could confirm whether or not you ever put a note at Template talk:Wr concerning the TfD discussion you closed here? Such notes are extremely helpful for anyone later considering nominating the templates for deletion, or speedy deleting them. Apologies if you did add such a notice. Carcharoth 16:05, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for November 6th.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:28, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

RfA thanks
 Thank you for participating in my RfA discussion! I appreciate you contributing your voice to the debate and its outcome. I hope how I wield the mop makes you proud. Thanks! &mdash; Saxifrage

RfA
Hi Ryan! I don't mean to be annoying, but just reminding you that you said that you would write me an admin nom to go live tomorrow here. If you are still interested and have the time, please let me know when it goes live, and thanks again for the nom! - Mike | Talk 00:51, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks very much! - Mike | Talk 02:54, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
 * I've answered the questions and listed the nom. Thanks again! - Mike | Talk 21:05, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Hi Ryan, I'm thinking I'm going to withdraw the RfA and try again in a few months. It seemed to be on cruise control early on, but now it seems it hit a guardrail and spun out of control (Yay for crazy road analogies!) I do think that I was a little too hasty in wanting the tools and this nom was rather premature after the last one. Although, if I never created the first one this one might have turned out far differently (D'oh!). Many thanks for your nomination. Oh, and BTW, your response to KazakhPol hit the nail right on the head :-D. - [[User:Mike1|Mike | Talk 03:33, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for November 13th.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:23, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Dangherous
Generally adding notes to Beauracrats about users' voting tendencies is frowned upon. Please refrain from doing this again for Dangherous or any other user. Beauracrats are usually able to discern the revenge-votes from true community consensus. On another note I find it somewhat surprising that you consider it acceptable to characterize another users' edits as "disruptive," "abusive" and "spurious," but consider it a personal attack when someone says a potential administrator lacks the required temperament. KazakhPol 03:08, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for November 20th.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:46, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

User:Will314159 Legal threats
Please see here. I'm fed up with him. &lt;&lt; armon &gt;&gt; 12:37, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for November 27th.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 01:55, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

My RfA
Thank you very much for your support! I greatly appreciate it. Biruitorul 19:22, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for December 4th.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:51, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

User:Shame On You
Thank you for your block action.I fear a block will not stop him since he claims "you believe that I have that only one IP dirty idiot? I have a lot of accounts here and in the others wiki then fuck off ****. block one I will create five other poor ****. I go where I want, I say what I want..." but since you understand french well Merci et bon courage pour "War & Peace" ;-)--Neuromancien 07:19, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for voting


Thank you for voting in my RfA which at 51/20/6 unfortunately did not achieve consensus. In closing the nomination, Essjay remarked that it was one of the better discussed RfAs seen recently and I would like to thank you and all others who chose to vote for making it as such. It was extremely humbling to see the large number of support votes, and the number of oppose votes and comments will help me to become stronger. I hope to run again for adminship soon. Thank you all once more. Wikiwoohoo 19:24, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Rollback on Barak Obama
I just noticed that you did a revert on Barak Obama using what appears to be the rollback button. Did you intend this as a vandalism revert or just an editorial one? The fact the anonymous editor posted is actually true (it was on ABC news this evening) although it didn't provide a citation. Using rollback is usually discouraged on editorial edits. Just a friendly note. --StuffOfInterest 01:38, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Hi. I don't disagree that the fact was trivial cruft.  My only concern was that a good faith edit was rolled back in a way that made it look like vandalism.  Thanks for your understanding.  Of course, right after your rollback the article got hit with some serious vandalism (replacing Obama with Osama). :) --StuffOfInterest 01:48, 12 December 2006 (UTC)