User talk:RyanXzavier

Speedy deletion of Nikki Jane
A tag has been placed on Nikki Jane requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. FlyingToaster (talk) 05:23, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Nikki Jane
A tag has been placed on Nikki Jane requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Beano (talk) 05:49, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

Reply
Hi, RyanXzavier. Thanks for your message. I just wanted to share some tips with you in order to keep that page running if you really want to see it grow. Whether it's me, or someone else, inevitably a speedy deletion tag would have been put on the article if it remains the same. I can see that on your talkpage that a tag has been placed on it on more than one occasion. The best advice I can give you is to expand the article, and include sources that would prove her credibility and her significance. WP:MOS, WP:V, and WP:NEW would all be three great places to turn to if you need help. It's also better to follow the directions to the speedy deletion tag, rather than removing it. Placing the hangon tag gives you time and a chance to explain the significance of the article to people looking at it. Deleting the tag (I believe) actually re-adds the page back to the list of new pages and will generate the attention of another user that is looking for articles to tag. If you have any questions or need help, don't be afraid to message me. If I don't have an answer, I will find someone that does. Beano (talk) 06:13, 12 October 2008 (UTC)


 * No problem. One thing that would help a lot is to add a reliable source. Is there an online article that credits her for the song you mentioned? That would be a good start. I made a small edit to the sentence structure on the first sentence of the page. Check it out and let me know what you think. Keep in mind that sentences like "The soundtrack is said to be one of the most dynamic, yet creative releases on the LOGO music networks" would be something that would be conflicting with WP:NPOV. Make sure anything that is uniquely edited or put on that article is supported by a source. That will help retain credibility. Beano (talk) 06:33, 12 October 2008 (UTC)


 * When you find a source, you will want to add it either as a reference section in the article, or add a footnote reference in a sentence that needs it. Adding Citations will help you with this. The link provided teaches you how to cite sources, add footnotes, everything. You can also check pages that are edited often here in Wikipedia to see what citations and cited sentences look like. Pages like Myspace, Microsoft, or Wikipeida (yeah, they have their own article LOL). I do that sometimes when I run into difficult situations. I googled the name and album for you, but nothing credible that could be used here popped up. Just stores wanting to sell the album. Let me know if you have any more questions. Beano (talk) 06:48, 12 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Sources from myspace are discouraged on wikipedia because it doesn't hold true significance (i.e. anyone can make a myspace). A credible source would be from a website that is trusted, or whose author is trusted (i.e. an imdb.com article is a credible site to cite significance to a movie star). Generally, how I think of it as is this: If you wouldn't put it in a school report or a term paper, it's not a reliable source. Beano (talk) 07:08, 12 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The amazon reference provided isn't the best in my opinion. Although it does credit Nikki Jane as a contributor to the album, the source's main purpose is to advertise and sell the album. That wouldn't be credible to an admin here. The second one is better. It provides information and pictures of Nikki Jane, but it is a blog site. That isn't bad, but blogs generally are changed or removed as time goes by. You are getting off to a very well start. Update my talk page if you have any questions. Beano (talk) 08:33, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 06:39, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

October 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Nikki Jane has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): rule: '\btypepad\.com\b' (link(s): http://penetrationinc.typepad.com/my_weblog/noahs-arc-jumping-the-bro.html). If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).

If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! XLinkBot (talk) 07:30, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Nikki Jane has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): rule: '\byoutube\.com' (link(s): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fG73XOAllm4 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D717hHe2ZbE http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CtavHm1bzlA http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_SA7Prl9kSY). If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. an image or a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).

If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! XLinkBot (talk) 17:19, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Nikki Jane
A tag has been placed on Nikki Jane requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. - -The Spooky One (talk to me) 00:34, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Please do not attack other contributors, as you did with this edit to User talk:NurseryRhyme. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Razor ICE  10:07, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

October 2008
Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. This flag once was red  10:10, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

What did I do to you? Little Red Riding Hood  talk  18:23, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I didn't delete anything; i merely tagged it for speedy deletion User:Orangemike was the one who deleted it. Any complaints should be dealt with him. - -The Spooky One (talk to me) 18:52, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

You have been from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for attempting to harass other users. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below.