User talk:Ryan Vesey/Archive 6

A kitten for you!
Thanks for the help with the redirects. I appreciate it. I almost never create soft redirects and therefore I am not very familiar with them.

Toshio Yamaguchi (talk) 20:00, 11 August 2011 (UTC) 

DYK nom for HMS Phoenix (N96)
Hi Ryan, I have reviewed your DYK nom at Template talk:Did you know/HMS Phoenix (N96) and there is still a small issue I would like to see addressed. Could you respond at the nominations page? Thanks. Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:22, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
 * The image is not especially good at 100px, so I have promoted the hook without the image. It is in Prep 3 now. Crisco 1492 (talk) 03:16, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
 * I think the cropped version looks pretty good though. Aspects of the submarine are clearly discernible and the wake is crisp.  Ryan Vesey  Review me!  03:20, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Alright, I will try and move it to Prep 4. Crisco 1492 (talk) 03:24, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you. Ryan Vesey  Review me!  03:59, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

Nice to see you
at Territorial architecture. However your last change (at least in terms of the article's layout) "The style remained in use until 1900. It came back into use in 1930 in the form of Territorial Revival architecture." Is going to need some work because I am finding Territorial styles houses from the 1920s - which puts them between the two styles as we how have them. In any case, it is nice to be involved in a good-faith effort such as this. Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 15:38, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
 * The Conron and Lent reference is from a magazine, New Mexico Architecture, which I have. Almost all of my references are from books in my library, I rarely use stuff from the www, so links don't exist, that I am aware of.  What more can I add to that citation?  Do you need a direct quote for something? Carptrash (talk) 15:43, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

DYK for HMS Phoenix (N96)
Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:02, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

The Kingdom Tower DYK is today
Can you revert poor edits, it hasn't received any IP vandalism yet, but a few mediocre registered editor have made edits that would be better not made, so can you undo bad edits at some points during the next 3-8 hours? I've made the article significantly better even since the GA nom, and today is the day tons of people will see it; it will look silly with non content-adding additions, which is the only thing I ever too. I think it's just silly to look at the revision history of most highly trafficked articles and see page after page of stagnantly fluctuating byte length because all the edits are as pointless as banter. Daniel Christensen (talk) 03:18, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
 * I would but I'm not going to be on much while it is on the main page. I open at work tomorrow and am logging off early.  Ryan Vesey  Review me!  03:31, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
 * The DYK is over already, why was it immediately at the bottom of the list so that it was the first to be pushed off? Is it percieved as a bad article? It was the last DYK right from the start, even though most DYK's are much shorter and not GA's. Oh well, hopefully it can be "in the news" at some point, like if there's an official construction ceremony. Daniel Christensen (talk) 11:03, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Nope, the order on the list has nothing to do with when they are removed. Each group of DYK's is on the main page for 8 hours.  Ryan Vesey  Review me!  18:09, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 15 August 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 09:31, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

User:Ryan Vesey/Pre-RFA Proposal
Hi Ryan. I'm just wondering if you might not have preferred to have created this at  WP:RFA/RADICAL where it would gain maximum exposure and feedback. Past research has shown that Wikipedia project pages are more likely to be on the watchlists of  a broader readership  than  individual  user projects. The 'radical' sub page was created on the request of several  members the task force for just such interesting  new ideas. Of course it's entirely up  to  you. If you need any help with anything don't hesitate to drop me a line. Best, --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:32, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
 * I will be moving this, but it isn't completely finished yet. Ryan Vesey  Review me!  12:54, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

Whoops
Yeah, I just saw that, and was about to fix it. The template was sitting on a user's Talk page and when I edited what I thought was their Talk page, I somehow wound up editing the template. Whoops. The Mark of the Beast (talk) 20:49, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

Adoption offer: 4tiggy
Hi Ryan, thanks for the adoption offer ... much appreciated :) I am on vacation til September, after that I would appreciate help ... especially with the sandbox article stub I have created to a red link :)  Thanks and enjoy the rest of the summer!--4tiggy (talk) 22:26, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

User:Ryan Vesey/Pre-RFA Proposal
Hi, good job but do you mind if I fix the grammar a little bit on it?  Puffin  Let's talk! 12:53, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
 * No problem. It hasn't really gotten out of the starting gate yet, but I would appreciate some assistance before it gets there.  Ryan Vesey  Review me!  14:13, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

Three months have passed
Today is the end of the time I said I would watch you, so I have taken this page off my watch list. Of course you are still welcome to contact me, as any Wikipedia user is, but there is no longer any formal relationship. I never thought there would be any serious problems, but undertook to keep an eye on you to satisfy the doubts of other admins. Keep up the good work. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:28, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
 * I feel a head pat is in order. *Pats Ryan's head*  WormTT   &middot; &#32;(talk) 11:30, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the time you have put in. Ryan Vesey  Review me!  04:51, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
 * It must of been hard, seeing all the contributions for 3 months strait. I know what you are thinking, that I am watched by  indefinitely, but it must be hard.  Well, congrats RV!   Ebe 123  talkContribs 22:36, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

In regards to the last edit to your user page...
one word: Reflinks. ;)  Nolelover   Talk · Contribs  03:00, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Ahh, but I would have missed out on all the fun. I actually have a gadget installed to help with refs and didn't think to use it.  I may try reflinks in the future, thanks.  Ryan Vesey  Review me!  03:07, 19 August 2011 (UTC)

EditorReviewArchiver: Automatic processing of your editor review
This is an automated message. Your editor review is scheduled to be closed on 22 August 2011 because it will have been open for more than 30 days and inactive for more than 7 days. You can keep it open longer by posting a comment to the review page requesting more input. Adding  to the review page will prevent further automated actions. AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:52, 19 August 2011 (UTC)

Power Rangers images
Are you on a personal mission to delete all Power Rangers images? These are TV screenshots that illustrate the subjects of the articles they are placed on, and there are NO free replacements for TV screenshots since Power Rangers is a work of fiction. ANDROS1337 TALK 17:37, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
 * I am not on a personal mission to delete them all. My tagging was a result of the discussion at Talk:Other Rangers and Ranger-like allies.  It is unnecessary to include non-free screenshots of various power rangers because a free alternative to the image can exist in the form of photographs of costumes.  Free alternatives were already found for images of various power rangers.  I really have absolutely no interest in Power rangers and will not respond to any more comments on the subject.  Ryan Vesey  Review me!  17:52, 19 August 2011 (UTC)

First of all, none of the images you tagged as replaceable are in fact replaceable due to the fact that they are TV screenshots. And second, we cannot use an image that explicitly depicts characters that were never in Power Rangers to represent the characters in Power Rangers. And third, the photograph of the Gorengers is debateably not free because it was a photograph taken of a defunct museum's exhibition.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龙 ) 17:53, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
 * First, the museum does not have a copyright on the exhibit and the image was released into public domain by the photographer. Second, how should I know the image isn't a power ranger, it was shown to me by User:SchuminWeb and it looks like a power ranger to me. Third, I really don't care about power rangers so take this to Talk:Other Rangers and Ranger-like allies. Ryan Vesey  Review me!  17:59, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Done so.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龙 ) 18:03, 19 August 2011 (UTC)

RE: Invitation WikiProject Wikify
It's my honor to be invited in WikiProject Wikify. — Rammaumtalkstalk 13:44, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
 * I am glad you chose to join. Have you considered taking part in WikiProject Wikify/Drives/2011/August our August Drive?  Ryan Vesey  Review me!  23:34, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Yup! but in slower pace. — Rammaumtalkstalk 08:38, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Allen Morris playing tennis at Wimbledon.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Allen Morris playing tennis at Wimbledon.jpeg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mosmof (talk) 01:02, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

Architecture infobox request
I noticed your request over on the talk page of WikiProject Architecture. I'm not a member of that particular project, but thought I might suggest you might have a more immediate response to your request to design a new infobox, if you posted it Here. Maile66 (talk) 00:25, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 22 August 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 00:25, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

Template:Copied syntax
Hi. Thanks for using informative edit summaries and placing Copieds at Talk:University of Pennsylvania and Talk:Student life at the University of Pennsylvania. Only the numeric oldid values are required, so I've removed the excess URLs (e.g., ). Flatscan (talk) 04:48, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for letting me know :) Ryan Vesey  Review me!  04:51, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

I voted and you should too
SPID:      3545 -BEGIN PGP MESSAGE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

hQIMA+DblIy497DOARAAk7yV657y8aGhSOQiHw1m0CSzJT39A3/8BJDX1DWMY2/9 5diK/1BbxXwoa1XUv5piask1zasBfMa60++kQ6J3YOaMxuP77SgXBzWVSVXS7O/W j2gYjA9hTjpBOBNxFG9lqeSkhMIpYudDs+uE8IzJBq5FULZhvCXmMMGAAIOxrCE/ MQVIr7nkaZUw13HdA16TuUMwAXoHsI/FoOs5uUK7scYM48KsCIQF1J1qntDDk2E0 49VIEYhXOb4moCCC/7aXcyfBb5nuPQNiWapzFV2UDzgzyqN+CASUlpLnvGV10rFu UVjUWK2/WsAhzj/lJXguicLjKhrCC4V9varK+rQL4YRCWb08D5953zVQAwOSs2va um8zjvicm4Mrq5CQxtQph21ioOS9FdwnHh/3xNPoldB3Zo3akt603r51D85P/MvA h593XAM8ENyXkggjmGRR68qH+4UIWMHFFFYs5b8cvVQhEhCMyjm+FR4Z7C4DEn/S v3RGqs2tzbJmAjpgtW9DVQDAe1Ymv3YSfP1Rw7u09fbeJfPT9xccyJNGYihTmB4n crTKZbeaS7qMZ1eCv8IVGQnFeLxbg3/Va+fQY0sYLNThw0P4MTA6N7C3mRIwmRC1 HvBcpj2/1ePegN/sQRKP2pAHTlzk3kmMrAN/6nNiA1R/YRe4YAbL33iS4g13lNDS 6QHprQraOaJHaeUMsJ3LPLCSgsQzFcgrq8aRGe+IeJH1uLP7ycH0338xGqZi6b5U tci7Y4RRbQRKuSlcOGIzqG5ljclAMnID/91M+Dj63GxAqhdPJLLfirsB58WWNP3U K3sr1kLZFijK8zrhGwuYG7967StCxWc9uInAfnin2znmx5O8zi9wPVQxfiwV+p82 IHqizUoGieRBXfywb1jywGlliwKbhbrM/k9rLrwir8VxJQVcT34ZvEkvHQgDYY4R hM9lwPSPglhkfkUW1TVz76vac10ajJTXrKAgRTih8eGXbO1Iof9y8ks9EQ7IV3DY wKJ0SDa9+2lggR3QHybbWaNvThi7mQZdZYanIxUBxDpni8IlYdjiFHyEr6ZmH1nf MQxd59vpl/Tqr0XhBoaQlKHZOBAGgBPSAh9T3fFlHR7PPo/E8oAnjFeShiT7vXa8 zsIC8LcasW9teZbW0XoINBYE697gw3CV/LmsWZjvnjvzeaztEtgdeCsu2S5JgRnu cTuo0huMKNGKRM8JhDlJ/Zztnr8Br070d7Hv+79UUBnTAe0ICB0h9xCA3EUPgZ9L AvYi3zaMqzZ8v/C7w4Yh1O4e7DewKCUXudxchzrOb/ruXQcYwERdgarqz/nxXcKq NDzCVzGxcteYwyk3tfjkdwR1NjQca1ssQQHXnXWRvRRywPvha6czbU0/nWSnc56y ICOm2xVeIimftCSeEcJEtU2xGBl2xjcpxrBY14fgs1ytfYrnAQEGYhOB2YhXOwHY VJwZqwFmW8svwxSaLqe6RnEWrHuhTnXHRd1GYFVVFtjJBepYiPLgpg78rKGkj43k It8fHnF4wSikwQf44ireWBS2FK+p1/wD9ewI2qbI36pEUiwhQBzQF6v/zF6auVat rFykBdnz6y7D+7LVYGDGZEwPzhnPFOnzD43qVhn2QyxQ49wsYbN0Ny2tYeo+D0/T Vh49GKnyffZNZcynsyCxT+wk95UKQENaqIcDLCRuQYpftujSxok+AXghk4a4RKnl tLjZ0cydTfn6EKZe7vO9s147CWQLdn34e6C8k+gdT9eg8TtcXX6OGwWITOEoKJlk tDYmKXVLk94HX77l4MwMkqQ45OhIJUceJf+I5hIZQsT/Zlpj7KXlxW0Psz67it+4 th1D+gLN/LgCCbsPLWzh59cYQ8C9HPyDyE22H/iDh38ZNfAHajwmXwXVwCb+fzbb prhZcl5ql4as1Cs1GIJ3sZiOgklz0qppovuf3BDxtXYme1A2nay75agSlb7ApQ== =0BhO -END PGP MESSAGE-

Ryan Vesey Review me!  05:24, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Hey, I voted in the 2011 Board of Trustees election and the referendum.  Ebe 123  talkContribs 10:16, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
 * I didn't notice you commented here. I voted at the election as well.  Ryan Vesey  Review me!  03:32, 29 August 2011 (UTC)

Talkback!
Avic ennasis @ 21:02, 23 Av 5771 / 21:02, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

WikiProject Wikify August drive
Hey there, I wish I am wrong but I just wanna share you a friendly suggestion as I was seeing your name below mine at WikiProject Wikify August drive page. I think the articles marked with { { Wikify } } counts more. You can find them here randomly. — Rammaumtalkstalk 23:45, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
 * The articles in the category Category:All articles that need to be wikified include all of the articles with dead end tags as well. I am currently trying to clear a bunch of small pages to reduce as much of the backlog as I can.  Much of the time I don't take credit for the article at all.  If I do, the section I have marked with ✅ instead of  are only counted as half of an article.  Thanks though  Ryan Vesey  Review me!  00:26, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

Salmon High School
Hi. Thanks for your edit. Regarding your edit summary and your useful comment at WT:V, it may be helpful if you gave a link on the article's talk page for the discussion that determined that all high schools are notable. I'd like to look at it too. Thank you. Regards, Bob K31416 (talk) 02:46, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Stated notability issues on talk. Ryan Vesey  Review me!  03:00, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you. Regards, Bob K31416 (talk) 03:16, 25 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Hi, Ryan. I have answered your question about this at User talk:JamesBWatson. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:53, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
 * I expect you are watching, but to be sure I thought I would just mention that since posting the above I have thought again, and rather changed my view on this. My latest thoughts on it are at User talk:Jimbo Wales. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:51, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

Talkback
. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 16:02, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Notability (high schools)
See my comments on the talk page - please do not revert my edits without addressing my talk page comments. TerriersFan (talk) 22:40, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
 * I am expecting a prompt response otherwise I will re-establish my revert. TerriersFan (talk) 22:55, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
 * I did respond. Ryan Vesey  Review me!  22:56, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

Minor afd point
Hi, FYI I think the nominator can not vote in an Afd. But no big deal. Cheers. History2007 (talk) 20:20, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Right, earlier I had changed my decision to rewrite and rename. I was making it clear that I still wanted it deleted.  It occurs fairly often too where someone will say "Delete as nom" to make sure their !vote isn't forgotten by the person closing the discussion.  Ryan Vesey  Review me!  20:26, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

WP:RFA2011
Hi Ryan. I've noticed you have become extremely active recently in many areas of policy making. The idea behind the collaboration of Wikipedia project members, especially at WP:RFA2011, is to  make positive proposals. They do not generally offer reasons and opportunities to oppose their own stated  aims - the broader community will do enough of that  when proposals are made at central RfA. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 23:04, 27 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments are welcome, but If you wish  to  get  involve in policy  matters at  Wikipedia,  please AGF and refrain  form  making  personal  attacks, and off topic  statements. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 00:08, 28 August 2011 (UTC)


 * I am sorry that I did not see the note you provided here earlier, but I completely disagree. It is entirely possible that a member of the project could oppose a minimum requirement.  I am sorry if you viewed my comment as a personal attack and I may have taken your comment the wrong way, but it appeared to me that you italicized active in response to my earlier comments that I wasn't a biggy on stats.  If you were not directing the comment at me, I am sorry for my overreaction, but I still believe the comment is degrading to whichever editors you were referring to as inactive members.  Ryan Vesey  Review me!  00:21, 28 August 2011 (UTC)


 * See Editor review/Ryan Vesey. I trust you'll have the courtesy to remove the personal attack / off topic from the RfA project page yourself. And BTW, we do have unfortunately, several editors who have joined the task force clearly for the wrong reasons and there will shortly be a task force newsletter suggesting that they reconsider their membership. I started WP:RFA2011 and work as hard as anyone at keeping it together and moving forward, and I'm sick and tired of the people who just come along to criticise  and tell us we're doing it all wrong - if you read all the project's talk pages from the beginning and get up to date, you'll understand what I mean. Most of the active members of that project are already admins, have been through hell week,  and therefore have nothing personal to gain whatsoever by making and  pursuing suggestions for improvement in order to make RfA a more pleasant experience for those who follow in our footsteps. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 00:50, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
 * I disagree that you truly have nothing to gain. You really have everything to gain.  Is there something to be gained by becoming an admin?  It depends.  The admin status shouldn't be the goal, the goal should be the tools.  You gain a way to help the community in a stronger way than you are able to previously.  I almost think the admins taking part in RfA reform have more to gain than anybody else.  They gain the satisfaction of improving Wikipedia for the better with full knowledge that they did not do so for selfish purposes.  Similarly, I did not join so I could have an easier RfA, I joined because I saw the devestation that RfA has brought to some editors.  As a member of WikiProject Wikify, I lost a really good editor to RfA, my goal is for that to not happen again.  Ryan Vesey  Review me!  01:06, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
 * I meant that those of us, like me, who are already admins have nothing personal to gain. I'm aware of the loss of one of the driving forces of the Wikikify project. The RfA attempt would probably not have succeeded anyway, but I certainly agree that it failed for all the wrong reasons - the very issues WP:RFA2011 is  trying to get changed. There is also a message for you on my tp. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 01:20, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
 * I know what you meant, I was just trying to share a different way of viewing it. Ryan Vesey  Review me!  01:25, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

Link
Just in case you've missed it (as I completely did), your input here would be appreciated.  Nolelover   Talk · Contribs  23:13, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

Talkback
LikeLakers2 (talk) 12:46, 28 August 2011 (UTC)


 * And again. :D LikeLakers2 (talk) 17:16, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 August 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 08:52, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

LOL
WP:HD

"If the "point" of the essay is changed, then make a new one!" This should go somewhere like WP:-). :) Toshio Yamaguchi (talk) 12:13, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

Hey, and I hope you will stay at the project. Toshio Yamaguchi (talk) 12:19, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

Scottish surnames
A large number of articles throughout the Wiki site are incorrect with respect of Scottish surnames.

For example one clan's name is rendered Mackenzie. This is incorrect. It is MacKenzie (with a capital 'K')

The convention is that surnames derived from 'son of (personal name)' are capitalised, but surnames derived from 'son of (occupation)' are not.

MacKenzie comes from effectively "Mac Kenzie" (an anglicised Kenneth). So "son of Kenneth". But Macintyre comes from Mac an t-Saoir "son of the carpenter" so it is not capitalised.

However I note that Wiki renders Macintyre with a capital 'i'.

I wonder if other contributors might have a discussion on this too. Montalban (talk) 03:51, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 05 September 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 00:39, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

RfA Reform update
Hi. It's been a little while since the last message on RfA reform, and there's been a fair amount of slow but steady progress. However, there is currently a flurry of activity due to some conversations on Jimbo's talk page.

I think we're very close to putting an idea or two forward before the community and there are at least two newer ones in the pipeline. So if you have a moment:
 * Have a look at the min requirement proposal and familiarise yourself with the statistics, I'd appreciate comment on where we should put the bar.
 * Any final comments would be appreciated on the clerks proposal.
 * Feedback on the two newer proposals - Pre-RfA & RfA reform 2011/Sysop on request. Both are more radical reforms of RfA and might run along side the current system.

Thanks for reading and for any comments that you've now made.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of RfA reform 2011 at 21:41, 6 September 2011 (UTC).

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:52, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

August Wikification Drive ribbon


This Wikification Ribbon is given to Ryan for completing 19.5-ish articles in the August 2011 Wikification drive. Thanks, and hurry back!  Nolelover   Talk · Contribs  15:18, 8 September 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 12 September 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 00:25, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

CSD log
Hi Ryan, I see that you've created a log for your CSDs, which is great! Can you please tell me how to set one up as well? Thanks Sp33dyphil  "Ad astra" 08:01, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Hi Sp33dyphil, I'm afraid Ryan is on a wikibreak at the moment, but I think I can answer this one. If you use Twinkle to do your CSD tagging, you can go to Twinkle/Preferences and scroll down to the CSD area. You'll find "Keep a log in userspace of all CSD nominations", check it and voila.  WormTT   &middot; &#32;(talk) 08:39, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

Help - please
Where can I go to settle an editing dispute on an article. I keep adding information, with citations, but another editior, basing his opinion on one single historian keeps removing it.

Does anyone know where this can be settled?

Montalban (talk) 22:03, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Ryan is currently inactive due to his schooling, but could you post a link to the article?  Nolelover   Talk · Contribs  22:16, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

It's on George Henry Thomas Montalban (talk) 01:14, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

talkback
K e rowyn Leave a note 05:45, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 19 September 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 10:29, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

News and progress from RfA reform 2011
(You are receiving this message because you are either a task force member, or you have contributed to recent discussions on any of these pages.)

The number of nominations continues to nosedive seriously, according to  these monthly figures. We know why this is, and if the trend continues our reserve of active admins will soon be underwater. Wikipedia now needs suitable editors to come forward. This can only be achieved either through changes to the current system, a radical alternative, or by fiat from elsewhere.

A lot of work is constantly being done behind the scenes by the coordinators and task force members, such as monitoring the talk pages, discussing new ideas, organising  the project  pages, researching  statistics and keeping  them  up  to  date. You'll also see for example that  we have recently  made tables to  compare how other Wikipedias choose  their sysops, and some tools have been developed to more closely examine !voters' habits.

The purpose of WP:RFA2011 is to focus attention on  specific issues of our  admin  selection  process and to develop  RfC proposals for solutions to improve them. For this, we have organised the project into dedicated sections each with their own discussion pages. It is important to understand that  all Wikipedia policy changes take a long  time to implement whether or not the discussions appear to  be active - getting the proposals right before offering them for discussion by the broader community is crucial to the success of any RfC. Consider keeping the pages and their talk pages on your watchlist; do check out older threads before starting a new one on topics that have been discussed already, and if you start a new thread, please revisit it regularly to follow up on new comments.

The object of WP:RFA2011 is not  to make it  either  easier or harder to  become an admin -  those criteria are set by  those who  !vote at  each  RfA. By providing  a unique venue for developing ideas for  change independent  of  the general discussion  at  WT:RFA, the project has two  clearly  defined goals: The fastest way is through improvement to the current system. Workspace is however also available within the project  pages to  suggest  and discuss ideas that are not  strictly  within  the remit  of this project. Users are invited to make use of these pages where they  will  offer maximum exposure to  the broader community, rather than individual  projects in  user space.
 * 1) Improving the environment  that  surrounds RfA in  order to  encourage mature, experienced editors of the right  calibre to  come forward, pass the interview, and dedicate some of their  time to  admin  tasks.
 * 2) Discouraging, in the nicest  way  possible of course, those whose RfA will be obvious NOTNOW or SNOW, and to  guide them towards the advice pages.

We already know what's wrong with RfA - let's not clutter the project with perennial chat. RFA2011 is now ready to propose some of the elements of reform, and all the task force needs to do now is to pre-draft those proposals in the project's workspace, agree on the wording, and then offer them for central discussion where the entire Wikipedia community will be more than welcome to express their opinions in  order to  build consensus.

New tool Check your RfA !voting history! Since the editors' RfA !vote counter at X!-Tools has been down for a long while, we now have a new RfA Vote Counter to replace it. A significant improvement on the former tool, it provides a a complete breakdown of an editor's RfA votes, together with an analysis of the participant's voting pattern.

Are you ready to help? Although the main engine of RFA2011 is its task force, constructive comments from any  editors are always welcome on  the project's various talk  pages. The main reasons  why  WT:RfA was never successful in  getting  anything  done are that threads on different aspects of RfA are all mixed together, and are then archived where nobody  remembers them and where they  are hard to  find - the same is true of ad hoc threads on  the founder's talk  page.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of RfA reform 2011 at 16:02, 25 September 2011 (UTC).

The Signpost: 26 September 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 02:18, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

WikiProject Wikify's October Newsletter
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Wikify at 16:08, 3 October 2011 (UTC).

Approved to use VandalSniper
Thank you for applying to use the counter-vandalism tool VandalSniper. You are now approved to use VandalSniper. To download the program, go here, and please also read the features guide if you have not already. VandalSniper is a powerful program, and misuse will result in your access being withdrawn. Disruptive editing through the program is your responsibility, not that of the operators of VandalSniper, and will result in your own account being blocked. If you have any questions, please contact a developer. Enjoy! Regards, AGK  [&bull; ] 18:03, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:10, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 3 October 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 05:55, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 10 October 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 03:16, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Thomas Bridges (Anglican missionary)
The article Thomas Bridges (Anglican missionary) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Thomas Bridges (Anglican missionary) for things which need to be addressed. – Quadell (talk) 13:55, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
 * I understand that you're currently on Wikibreak. I'm going to close this as a non-successful nomination at this time. If you later fix these problems, feel free to renominate it. All the best, – Quadell (talk) 13:11, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

Invitation to join the January 2012 Move to Commons Drive
You got this message since you added yourself to the last time or is a member that stated yourself for moving files or related help. If you do not want notification for a future drive, please add yourself to this list.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Images and Media at 00:06, 15 October 2011 (UTC).

The Signpost: 17 October 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 11:03, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 October 2011
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 11:19, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Re: Penn Med Logo
Thanks! Now back to immunology lecture... The Haz talk 12:41, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 October 2011
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 18:04, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:00, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 7 November2011
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 13:09, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

Good luck!
Dear Ryan!

I just want to wish you good luck at school. Congratulations on the true WikiLove, also. :)

I trust you'll return in early January. :)

Best regards, Kiefer .Wolfowitz 15:36, 5 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Ditto! Kiefer .Wolfowitz 16:06, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much Kiefer, I'll really need it this week. Ryan Vesey  Review me!  16:13, 11 November 2011 (UTC)