User talk:Ryan barnes 1963

May 2024
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Tak: The Great Juju Challenge have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:10, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Tak: The Great Juju Challenge was changed by Ryan barnes 1963 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.890714 on 2024-05-22T05:09:58+00:00

Tagging
Hi — please don't tag a whole bunch of pages with a rewrite template; it doesn't actually help to build the encyclopedia. I think that you should spend some time adding constructive content before you tag any more articles. Toughpigs (talk) 07:08, 22 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Seconded. Your tags don't make sense on their own. A number of the articles appear to be fine. Please stop tagging articles until you've spent more time learning how Wikipedia works (same goes for that deletion nominations that is headed for a quick-fail because you didn't even give a reason). You can raise concerns about how an article is written on article talk pages for now. Sergecross73   msg me  10:57, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Thirded. Noticed a series of completely bogus AfD nominations with no rationale whatsoever. You will likely be blocked if you continue per NOTHERE. TheBritinator (talk) 16:30, 22 May 2024 (UTC)

Final warning
I understand it takes time to learn how Wikipedia works, but at the same time, your disruptive edits are too much, too fast. Any more bad tagging or bad deletion nominations in the short-term, and your account will be temporarily blocked. Sergecross73  msg me  16:32, 22 May 2024 (UTC)

Really. Please stop your disruptive AFD nominations now. Skynxnex (talk) 02:16, 23 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Your account is blocked indefinitely until you start sufficiently addressing all these talk page concerns. Sergecross73   msg me  02:36, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Ryan barnes 1963 (talk) 03:35, 23 May 2024 (UTC)


 * This block was...not an oversight or a mistake. You've done nothing but sloppy and erroneous deletion nominations, and questionably vague tags, on articles so far. You refused to address this, so a block has been enforced to stop these disruptive edits. If you want to discuss changing how you edit and a plan for the future, I'm open to discussing. But unblock requests that don't even address this are not going to work. Sergecross73   msg me  15:21, 23 May 2024 (UTC)

✅ further abuse of multiple accounts with. I strongly recommend declining this unblock request but will leave it to the next reviewing admin. --Yamla (talk) 23:07, 2 June 2024 (UTC) Ryan barnes 1963 (talk) 04:44, 3 June 2024 (UTC) Okay I Will Accept It! Ryan barnes 1963 (talk) 04:44, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Just noting for the record, this user is probably . -- ferret (talk) 18:01, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

To the next reviewing admin, please strongly consider revoking talk page access to prevent all of us wasting even more time here. --Yamla (talk) 18:47, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

As ferret mentioned, this editor had the audacity to email me asking to create a rationale-less AFD nomination on their behalf. They absolutely do not understand the problem here. Probably one of the worst CIR red flags I've seen in recent memory. Sergecross73  msg me  02:20, 4 June 2024 (UTC)