User talk:Ryan beta

Image copyright problem with Image:Joel7777.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Joel7777.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ˉˉanetode╦╩ 16:57, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

This was film shot by myself, Douglas Farran. I also have obtained written permission by Mr.Kass for publication of the photos for GFDL purposes. Ryan beta 03:55, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Orch1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Orch1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:57, 1 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ˉˉanetode╦╩ 16:57, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

This was film shot by myself, Douglas Farran. I also have obtained written permission by Mr.Kass for publication of the photos for GFDL purposes. Ryan beta 03:55, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Son43.ogg
Thanks for uploading Image:Son43.ogg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:08, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:AUDLANDSYN SUMMIT.ogg
Thanks for uploading Image:AUDLANDSYN SUMMIT.ogg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 20:43, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

Editing comments
It is inappropriate for you to delete the comments of other users on talk pages. Please WP:AGF in other users who are acting in good faith themselves. Thanks.-Andrew c [talk] 04:21, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Stop removing page content
If a section or page is being re-written, you need to leave in the old content until the new content is ready. Rainbow Of Light  Talk  08:04, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

July 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Joel Kass has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Rainbow Of Light  Talk  08:10, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Joel Kass constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to remove content. Thanks. Rainbow Of Light  Talk  08:18, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, but such edits are not considered constructive. You've removed a sentence, and you've added at least one typo (missing blank before [), besides a missing word which makes the sentence grammatically incorrect. Please use the preview function. --PaterMcFly (talk) 08:25, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Please do not remove content from pages without explanation, as you did with this edit to Joel Kass. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Rainbow Of Light  Talk  08:25, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked for abusing multiple accounts. To contest this block please place below. Tiptoety talk 16:31, 18 July 2008 (UTC)