User talk:Ryanbolden

January 2015
Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Khloé Kardashian, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. IPadPerson (talk) 21:02, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kim Kardashian. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. IPadPerson (talk) 21:04, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Brandon Jenner. Your edits have been reverted or removed. Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. IPadPerson (talk) 21:05, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Kylie Jenner. IPadPerson (talk) 21:07, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Kris Jenner. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Scalhotrod (Talk) ☮ღ☺ 07:48, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Kim Kardashian. Limbsaw ~talk~  14:55, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for contravening Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Tabercil (talk) 15:17, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Last warning
You were blocked specifically because you keep violating Wikipedia's procedures by adding non-notable people to the various Kardashian articles. I see that you have not learned anything from the block and have continued to add to the article. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked and quite likely on a permanent basis. Tabercil (talk) 23:14, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Family Trees
I see you remain on a mission to fill celebrity info boxes with entire family trees. You have been asked to stop this and while I am assuming your edits are in good faith, I will request you are blocked if you continue. There are a number of reasons for this; Thanks. -- Escape Orbit (Talk) 10:50, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
 * The info boxes are supposed to be concise summaries about the article subject. Filling them with remote members of their family tree detracts from this.
 * There are many other more suitable ways of conveying this information. For instance, look at the The Kardashian Family Template that is included at the bottom of most of the pages you have edited.
 * Your additions are unsourced. The reader has no way of verifying them.
 * Your edits have been reverted a number of times. Repeatedly putting them back in without consensus is called "edit warring" and will get you permanently blocked.  Particularly when you have already had a block for this.
 * Please get into the habit of using the edit summary. Editing without any explanation is not helpful to others.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for continued disruptive editing and inappropriate use of multiple accounts. If you continue to add inappropriate and disputed content to biography articles despite multiple warnings and previous blocks your next block will be indefinite in length. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 19:27, 24 February 2015 (UTC)