User talk:Ryandavidreid

Proposed deletion of "DRI DUCK"
The deletion of an article you created, DRI DUCK, has been proposed for the following reason:


 * Non-notable corporation.

You are welcome to improve the article to meet Wikipedia's quality standards and remove the deletion notice from the article. You may also remove the notice if you disagree with the deletion, though in such cases, further discussion may take place at Articles for deletion, and the article may still be deleted if there is a consensus to do so.

Wikipedia has certain standards for inclusion that all articles must meet. Certain types of article must establish the notability of their subject by asserting its importance or significance. Additionally, since Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, content inappropriate for an encyclopedia, or content that would be more suited to somewhere else (such as a directory or social networking website) is not acceptable. See What Wikipedia is not for the relevant policy. You may wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you.  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 22:44, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

DRI DUCK is a notable company that offers insight and new ideas in the apparel and work wear industry. Organic cotton jackets, one of a kind waterproof technology, and support for the Fair Labor Association, Organic Exchange, and C-TPAT are all reasons that justify DRI DUCK's importance. DRI DUCK should not be deleted based on relevance and factual support. Ryandavidreid (talk) 23:27, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

This DRI DUCK article is backed by reliable sources and factual evidence. There is no form of advertisement written in this article and it supports multiple non profit groups as well as goverment organizations. It discussed new technology and events in the apparel industry and offers valid insight to readers. Do not delete. Ryandavidreid (talk) 00:59, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Spam
I have removed unwanted material from the article Dri Duck. If it is reinserted, the article may be deleted on the grounds that it is promotional. --  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 01:21, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

COI
If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam); and,
 * 4) avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. No SPAM was used. Please be more specific. Ryandavidreid (talk) 18:56, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for businesses. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 08:23, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Neutral p.o.v was used, please point out where the article is written like an advertisement? All resources should meet reliable standards based on quality and integrity of companies used. DRI DUCK is notable and is a key company in apparel industry. More specific details will help in the adjustment of this encyclopedia article Ryandavidreid (talk) 18:55, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Edit warring
Removing those tags repeatedly constitutes edit warring, and if you persist you can be blocked, particularly in light of your conflict of interest regarding this article. Discuss the issue on the talk page of the article. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 19:36, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Dri Duck
I have nominated Dri Duck, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Dri Duck. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 19:39, 3 October 2008 (UTC) Nomoskedasticity (talk) 19:39, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

DRI DUCK meets notable credibility and has reliable resources to back factual evidence. Neutral POV was used and notability was met. Article should not be warranted for deletion. This article is not written like an advertisment and is written in the same tone and vocabulary as other wiki articles. Ryandavidreid (talk) 14:58, 6 October 2008 (UTC)