User talk:Ryanfoster99

Welcome!
Hello, Ryanfoster99, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Neutralitytalk 05:16, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Notice regarding all edits about, and all pages related to (i) abortion and (ii) the post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people
Neutralitytalk 05:18, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Neutralitytalk 05:18, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Note regarding Wikipedia policies
Hello,

Welcome to our community. Please take some time to review Edit warring, Neutral point of view, and Identifying reliable sources. When making edits to articles that might be viewed as contentious, please check the article talk page to see if there has been a prior discussion (or consensus) on a point. Thanks! Neutralitytalk 05:20, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

April 2017
Your recent editing history at Fake news shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Neil N  talk to me 16:34, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Please undo your last addition. --Neil N  talk to me 16:35, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to Presidency of Donald Trump while logged out. Making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. This is especially problematic if the behaviour could be interpreted as an attempt to avoid being limited by discretionary sanctions such as WP:1RR.  Murph 9000  (talk) 19:56, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Presidency of Donald Trump shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.You appear to be wilfully disregarding the WP:CONSENSUS and WP:1RR discretionary sanctions which are clearly visible on this article. Murph 9000  (talk) 19:59, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Last chance to self-revert this edit. You were informed of the discretionary sanctions on the page and you know that you must have consensus to reinstate an edit. Please revert.  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 22:19, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment; or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Signature icon.png) located above the edit window.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 22:25, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Notification of Arbitration Enforcement Request
There is an Arbitration Enforcement Request related to your edits. You can find the request at Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 22:33, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

To enforce an arbitration decision and for Violating 1RR on Presidency of Donald Trump, you have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours. You are welcome to edit once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block or other sanctions. If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page:. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page. Lord Roem ~ (talk) 22:43, 30 April 2017 (UTC)  Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."

Talkback
Murph 9000 (talk) 02:20, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Discussion at Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement
You are invited to join the discussion at Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement. - MrX 00:30, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

June 2017
To enforce an arbitration decision and for violating the topic ban imposed under Arbitration Committee's Discretionary Sanctions on the page Presidency of Donald Trump, you have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week. You are welcome to edit once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block or other sanctions. If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page:. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page. Dennis Brown - 2&cent; 00:44, 16 June 2017 (UTC)  Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."


 * Let me be blunt: You got off easy. I chose to only block you one week and not extend the topic ban.  The edit you made was sourced and wasn't inflammatory, which helped your case, but you are still not allowed to edit political articles for 6 months.  It is very likely that if this happens again, you topic ban will be doubled and your block will be a month.  The community doesn't play around with Arb restricted areas.  This article was very clearly under the topic ban.  If you want to edit an article and you aren't sure, check the talk page notices to see if it is covered, or ask any experienced editor or better yet, an admin, first.  Dennis Brown - 2&cent; 00:55, 16 June 2017 (UTC)