User talk:Ryankillackey

--FourPaws (talk) 08:14, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

July 2022
Hello, I'm HaeB. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Time-lapse photography have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Also, do not use misleading link descriptions, and do not misleadingly mark such content-changing edits as minor (see WP:NOTMINOR). HaeB (talk) 20:02, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for promotion or advertising, as you did at Digital_photograph_restoration. Please stop adding links to your own articles. JeffUK (talk) 20:00, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

Compare also User talk:Adilsayeedparadox regarding recent additions of links to the same company website (picsfast.com). Regards, HaeB (talk) 20:55, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

Please approve the change
Hello, HaeB. Hope you are doing great! I don't think that I made any mistake by adding this external link to the time-lapse photography page.

The above videos on the page are just low quality and not expressing the "time-lapse" appropriately.

The link I have added is one the best time-lapse video in the world. It was taken in California and it is an award winning photograph collection of more than 10,000+ images.

HaeB, it is my request to you please approve the change. This is not just a normal time-lapse video, it is work of someone's year.

HaeB Ryankillackey (talk) 20:24, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Please read WP:NOTPROMO. I see that two other editors have since reverted your additions of links to the same company website, describing them as a "spammish link" and as inferior to the reference you had deleted in favor of your own link, respectively.
 * And without going into your world-best assessment of your own work, the external links section is not meant award prizes to the best examples of a genre that is the subject of the article, but rather to link useful general information about it.
 * Also, do not use deceptive claims as you did in this edit (stating that you had "Updated the Tutorial", whereas in reality you deleted the link to the tutorial and replaced it to a link to your video which is not a tutorial).
 * Regards, HaeB (talk) 20:24, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of multiple accounts to add spam links. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 20:59, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
 * ✅ to .-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 20:59, 25 July 2022 (UTC)