User talk:Ryankrameretc

Jeff mullen
A tag has been placed on Jeff mullen, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable (see the guidelines for notability here). If you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please affix the template  to the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

Please read the criteria for speedy deletion (specifically, article #7) and our general biography criteria. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -- Armadillo From Hell 05:08, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Kramer111.pdf
Thanks for uploading Image:Kramer111.pdf. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 03:07, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Mediation
A mediation case has been opened in which your name is mentioned. I just signed up as a mediator, pending approval by the involved parties. Please take a look at Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/User:Lucky 6.9 reverting his own Talk page. If you would like to be listed as a party, please write your name in the blue box. If you feel you are not involved, please remove your name from the list under "Who's involved?". (In this case, your name will only be allowed to be reinserted if a reason is given.) &mdash; Sebastian 22:34, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

Update: The original case has been deleted by an involved party. I reported this incidend on administrators' noticeboard (now archived). Since I have not been asked by anyone to investigate this case, I will not pursue it any further. I'm not watching your user page anymore, so please let me know on my talk page if you have any questions or concerns. &mdash; Sebastian 20:03, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

Additions of http://.donorsiblingregistry.com
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, please do not add promotional material to articles. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" is strongly discouraged. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.--Hu12 (talk) 13:39, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

An apology
Dear Wendy and Ryan Kramer

I've done work on egg and sperm donor related articles in Wikipedia, some of the edits including sperm donor registration. I've tried to follow the Wikipedia guidelines. However, this apparently has resulted in a conflict between us, a conflict I regard unnecessary, and therefore I'd like us to resolve it.

I got to hear about this conflict as a co-founder of the new Scandindinavian registry, since one of the other members suddenly was excluded from registering in the DRS for participating in the same project as I was. I wouldn't let this strike another persons private life, someone's opportunity to seek his or hers genetic kindred. Therefore, I've left the organization with immediate effect. Still, however, I'm not really sure about what really is the cause of your disapproval. The member you excluded knows more about this than I do - still I find it better to turn directly to you.

If this is all about my creation of a Wikipedia article about donor sibling registration generally, then I can tell that I am sure that such an article draws more readers to Wikipedia, with more readers clicking their way to the proper DSR article. After all, it's the ones most unfamiliar with the subject, perhaps not knowing what such a registry really is, that are the most important readers, and these are the ones that are now facilitated to find their way to you.

Regarding any trademark violation of the Wikipedia article about registries for genetic kindred to find each other, it is now renamed to donor sibling registration to distinguish it from the Donor sibling registry article. If you have any other naming suggestions, feel free to propose them.

It has never been my intention to do any harm to the DSR, and I apologize for causing any misunderstanding, making it seem so.

If there are any other issues, I beg you to turn with them directly to me.

Best regards

Mikael Häggström (talk) 05:56, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:DSRHOME.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:DSRHOME.jpg I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org permissions-en@wikimedia.org], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org permissions-en@wikimedia.org].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  MBisanz  talk 04:38, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

Carlos A. Felippa
Hi, thanks for creating this. It's been tagged for notability for 5 years now. Would you be able to look it over and see if you can improve it? Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 11:38, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Carlos A. Felippa


The article Carlos A. Felippa has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No evidence of WP:NOTABILITY.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 15:41, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Ryanandwendykramer.jpg


The file File:Ryanandwendykramer.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * unused personal photo - WP:NOTWEBHOST

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:12, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:DSRLogo.jpg


The file File:DSRLogo.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unused (see WP:NOTWEBHOST), unclear purpose"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Zinclithium (talk) 06:19, 29 June 2018 (UTC)