User talk:Ryanliou/sandbox

Ethan Pak Peer Review
Hi Ryan! Overall, your drafts are extremely well-written and comprehensive. I especially enjoyed your historical overview, as it was brief and concise, but provided the right amount of information and background I needed to continue on with the article. Additionally, you did a great job with linking all your information and claims to valid and credible sources, while also keeping a neutral and encyclopedic tone. The single suggestion I have, though, is to possibly add information showing the arguments refuting the idea of the "tyranny of the majority." While I completely understand that you included that information as an explanation for the creation of quadratic voting, it currently reads as a scathing critique of our current systems. While you do not have to add a lot, possibly a sentence or two explaining the opposing argument could make this portion of your article sound more balanced. That being said, it was such a well-written draft and your comments and explanations about Taiwan were a great addition! Great work! Ethanpak (talk) 03:08, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

Peer review
Hi @Ryanliou! Great job with the draft! Overall, it was well-organized, clear, and easy to understand. I also really liked how you structured your article draft with headings above each section and how you included a section that discusses a real-life example in Taiwan. The sources you included are reliable and range from a diverse spectrum of authors. One thing I noticed though that was also brought up by some other peer reviewers is how some of the wording in the draft came off as a little biased, specifically in the section where you state "it isn't fair for the minorities." Although that maybe your perspective, not everyone may think that so it's important to maintain a neutral POV as there will be many people reading this. Despite that, it's a great starting point! --Lindseyjli3 (talk) 06:00, 14 October 2020 (UTC)