User talk:Ryanloeb

One thing that this group did very well was being specific. Their paragraphs were lengthy and full of relevant information. I felt that after reading just the main description of Confessions Pages, I had a good grasp on the concept and was well informed. Also, they were sure not to have a bias on the controversial topic, which is very important when writing for Wikipedia. Throughout the entire page, the writing was clear and concise, which helped me retain the information easily. Lastly, the sources were copious and credible; validity is a key ingredient for success in Wikipedia editors. One negative aspect of this page was that many of the examples were vague and unclear. I think that the editors generalized too often, but otherwise it was an exceptional job.

Nerlman88 (talk) 17:43, 26 March 2014 (UTC)