User talk:Ryanmoor7/sandbox

Article Evaluation- History of Rutgers Something that I first noticed is the small list of sources used by this article. There are only ten in total, and most of them are coming from Rutgers themselves. I believe that this hinders the point of views that is desired in a strong article. There are a couple without a link, but the ones that provide a link all function properly. The points in this article are all important to Rutgers history, and they remain neutral. Something that I have found to be left out is the Rutgers Athletic Program. Rutgers is now a part of the 'Big 10" and this has become a big point of interest when talking about the school. Also, the involvement of slavery is left out of the History of Rutgers, which is unacceptable if we are talking about a "history" article. This is a very serious issue with Rutgers history that deserves to be discussed. ```` Ryan M.