User talk:Ryantan

AfD nomination of Current and Voltage Surge Suppressors (CVSS™)
Current and Voltage Surge Suppressors (CVSS™), an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Current and Voltage Surge Suppressors (CVSS™) satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Current and Voltage Surge Suppressors (CVSS™) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Current and Voltage Surge Suppressors (CVSS™) during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. —  iride scent   (talk to me!)  12:54, 20 September 2007 (UTC)


 * The consensus at the discussion was to delete the article. If you want to continue to work on the article, I would be willing to move it to your user space to allow you to keep working on it.  However, you should probably first take a look at the notability guidelines to get a sense of the article inclusion criteria.-- Kubigula (talk) 03:30, 29 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Thank you for the notice. I was hoping to keep working at it, but from a different perspective. I understand that my old content was perhaps too focused on introducing a new technology, which 1) has no notability yet and 2) in trying to give credits to the company that developed this new technology, the use of TM appears to have thrown the article in the opposite direction instead. Anyways, I've gotten some valuable comments from the discussion during this time. I will still work on it on my own, as I already mentioned, taking another approach, such as the potential problems caused by current surge protectors. Some arguments have already been established in existing wiki articles. I will see what I can add to those. Thanks. Ryantan 19:25, 2 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Sounds good. Feel free to ask if you have questions or want advice.-- Kubigula (talk) 19:29, 2 October 2007 (UTC)