User talk:Ryro24

'''I do not believe I have a conflict of interest for I am not placing opinions in my article. Everything I am stating is fact that can only be known through me or the other co-creator of the troupe. I placed YouTube as a reference, for it shows how many views we have encouraging the fact that notability shouldn't be an issue. Conflict of interest shouldn't be an issue if I was providing opinionated material but all is pure fact. All responses made so far are unhelpful and narrow-minded without a more through analysis of my reasoning. ''' —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ryro24 (talk • contribs)


 * "Fact that can only be known through me" means you are publishing original research. Wikipedia is not a venue of first publication. If the subject is not well enough known to have gotten independent coverage, that usually means it isn't well enough known to have an article. —C.Fred (talk) 03:51, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Something Untitled
A tag has been placed on Something Untitled requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Ironholds 01:48, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam); and,
 * 4) avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for businesses. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. —C.Fred (talk) 02:20, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

October 2008
The recent edit you made to Something Untitled constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. — Jeff G. (talk&#124;contribs) 02:38, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Something Untitled. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. — Jeff G. (talk&#124;contribs) 02:40, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
 * YouTube is not a reliable source. —C.Fred (talk) 02:44, 6 October 2008 (UTC)