User talk:RyverSylt

Sumerian Neopaganism
Hi, I noticed that you re-blanked Sumerian Neopaganism. Please don't blank pages - if you feel the redirect should be deleted, you can list it at Redirects for discussion. Thanks! ƒirefly ( t · c · who? ) 21:01, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

June 2018
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Sumerian Neopaganism and List of Neopagan movements, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.--Eckhardt Etheling (talk) 23:16, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

Edit war
You currently appear to be engaged in edit wars&#32; according to the reverts you have made on List of Neopagan movements. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.--Eckhardt Etheling (talk) 23:24, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

What is a source?
WP:RS. A source, on Wikipedia, should be a publication from either an institution or the academia. The links that you added are not considerable reliable sources.--Eckhardt Etheling (talk) 23:45, 8 June 2018 (UTC)