User talk:Rzuwig

Witaj! / Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! --Darwinek (talk) 11:03, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Your request for rollback
Hi Rzuwig. After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback: If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! CharlieEchoTango ( contact ) 07:06, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
 * Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
 * Rollback should never be used to edit war.
 * If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
 * Use common sense.

Nomination of Ernst Ludwig von Aster for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ernst Ludwig von Aster is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ernst Ludwig von Aster until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Cssiitcic (talk) 19:44, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Palmanova Fortress


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Palmanova Fortress. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Palmanova. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Palmanova - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. noq (talk) 13:14, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

Thanks!
Thanks for participating in my RFA! I appreciate your support. Zagal e jo^^^ 06:35, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Karol Wojtyła (senior)


The article Karol Wojtyła (senior) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Does not seem to meet WP:N (notability). Being a parent of a notable person does not confer notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 19:22, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

Posting warnings to vandals' talk pages
Hello there. Thank you for your recent edit revert to the Brent Lillibridge article. It may be helpful to post a warning message to the user's talk page. Once you go to the user's talk page, you can also get an idea for how many times the user may have been warned in the past, and if needed, report the vandalizing editor to Administrator intervention against vandalism so a decision on a block by an admin can be made. As you can see with this editor, they have been blocked twice. After I reported the IP to the admin page, they have been blocked for a third time. Posting a warning and any subsequent action(s) is especially helpful with repeat offenders. Cheers! Zepppep (talk) 07:45, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

Recent report at AIV
Hi there! I noticed you recently reported an IP to AIV as a "spambot or compromised account". However, before reporting to AIV, the user needs to get warnings - blocks are uncommon without any warnings at all. Also, the IP's edits were more along the lines of vandalism then spamming. Thanks for your contributions, Mdann52 (talk) 18:36, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

Article notability notification
Hello. This message is to inform you that an article that you wrote recently, Emilia Wojtyła, has been tagged with a notability notice. This means that it may not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Please note that articles which do not meet these criteria may be merged, redirected, or deleted. Please consider adding reliable, secondary sources to the article in order to establish the topic's notability. You may find the following links useful when searching for sources:. Thank you for editing Wikipedia! VoxelBot 02:36, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Karol Wojtyła (senior)


A tag has been placed on Karol Wojtyła (senior) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here.  James ( T •  C ) • 8:18pm • 09:18, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Emilia Wojtyła


A tag has been placed on Emilia Wojtyła requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here.  James ( T •  C ) • 8:18pm • 09:18, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

Potential Adoption
Hello! I'm thrilled to note that you self-enrolled in my course, Wikipedia, at Education_Program:Western_Michigan_University/Wikipedia_(2013_Q2). If you are still interested in being a part of this, I would be thrilled to adopt you, as the course is now progressing. To do so, please visit User:Jackson Peebles/Adoption and add yourself to the waitlist (you will be approved shortly) in the format indicated (which includes notifying me at my talk page). If you are no longer interested, please un-enroll yourself from the course and notify me at my talk page. Thanks! --Jackson Peebles (talk) 21:29, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

Mazurek Dąbrowskiego move
Hi Rzuwig! Could you please let me know why you have unilaterally moved Poland Is Not Yet Lost to Mazurek Dąbrowskiego? You must have noticed on the article's talk page that the article's title has been long debated and that the current consensus is for Poland Is Not Yet Lost per Naming conventions (use English). I will ask an admin to allow moving the page back to that title. You are welcome to open a new move request, but please no more bold moves (per BOLD, revert, discuss cycle). — Kpalion(talk) 07:50, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Karol Wojtyła (senior) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Karol Wojtyła (senior) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Karol Wojtyła (senior) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 04:48, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Emilia Wojtyła for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Emilia Wojtyła is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Emilia Wojtyła until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 04:48, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

Reviewer
Hey Rzuwig, I've approved your request for the Reviewer permission. Take a look at WP:RG to see how it works and feel free to ask any questions on my talk page.  Malinaccier ( talk ) 20:00, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

America's Got Talent (season 10)
Hi Rzuwig,

I disagree with undoing my edit on the page. the page currently includes excessive information on a single episode of the show. Previous season pages such as in Seasons 7, 8, and 9 all do not include the audition information. We need to keep the page concise, and adding the auditions makes the page cluttered. That info is better stored in a website like America's Got Talent Wiki, not Wikipedia.

I have been trying to start this conversation in the Talk page, but one user even deleted the conversation. Adding the information messes up the standardization, so until a discussion has been settled on the talk page, I disagree with including the audition table.

206.117.40.12 (talk) 22:03, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Thanks very much...
...for your support over at my RfA. I shall do my best to be worthy of it. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 05:56, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

November 2015
Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made&#32;to File:Ada Lovelace portrait.jpg: you may already know about them, but you might find Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. RockMagnetist(talk) 16:44, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

Pentagonal pyramidal number
I'm lost, would you be so kind to revert the rational version?Xx236 (talk) 13:05, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:14, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Rzuwig!


Happy New Year! Rzuwig, Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. Liz Read! Talk! 20:59, 1 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Europe 10,000 Challenge invite
Hi. The WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:09, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

Invitation to discussion about Per-user page blocking
Hi there,

The Anti-Harassment Tools team is seeking input about building User Page (or category) blocking feature.

We’re inviting you to join the discussion because you voted or commented in the 2015 Community Wishlist Survey about Enhanced per-user / per-article protection / blocking.

You can leave comments on this discussion page or send an email to the Anti-Harassment Tools team.

For the Anti-Harassment Tools team SPoore (WMF), Community Advocate, Community health initiative (talk) 23:01, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Please let us know if you wish to opt-out of all massmessage mailings from the Anti-harassment tools team.

Your signature
Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated  tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors.

You are encouraged to change
 * → Rzuwig ►

to
 * → Rzuwig ►

Respectfully, Anomalocaris (talk) 06:57, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
 * ✅. Rzuwig ► 09:43, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks! —Anomalocaris (talk) 10:06, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

Renaming of the Dzhokhar Tsarnaev image
I see that you renamed the photo File:Dzhokhar Tsarnaev (crop).jpg to File:Dzhokhar Tsarnayev (crop).jpg as requested by another editor. I think that was improper. Someone didn't like the way the surname was spelled. But that's how the overwhelming majority of reliable sources have spelled it and that's how the U.S. government spelled it in legal documents. Probably that means that his legal name was "Tsarnaev" too – presumably that's how he writes his name himself in English and always has. This is a highly notable person whose name has appeared in practically every newspaper. Someone may think it should have been spelled differently to be a "correct" translation from another language, but this is his common name in English and his legal name in English. The articles about him and his brother and the incidents in which they were notoriously involved have been stable using that spelling for years. The uncropped image that this was derived from is still at the name File:Dzhokhar Tsarnaev.jpg. Changes like that shouldn't be made without discussion and consensus. —BarrelProof (talk) 07:12, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Select Survey Invite
I'm working on a study of political motivations and how they affect editing. I'd like to ask you to take a survey. The survey should take no more than 1-2 minutes. Your survey responses will be kept private. Our project is documented at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Wikipedia_%2B_Politics.

Your survey Link: https://uchicago.co1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_9S3JByWf57fXEkR?Q_DL=56np5HpEZWkMlr7_9S3JByWf57fXEkR_MLRP_8AfNkoP5nq9X8Et&Q_CHL=gl

I am asking you to participate in this study because you are a frequent editor of pages on Wikipedia that are of political interest. We would like to learn about your experiences in dealing with editors of different political orientations.

Sincere thanks for your help! Porteclefs (talk) 12:42, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

Help us design granular blocks!
Hello :-) The Anti-Harassment Tools team at the Wikimedia Foundation will start building these granular blocking tools in a few weeks and we've asked WMF designer Alex Hollender to help us make some wireframes so the tools are intuitive to MediaWiki users.

We have a first draft of how we think this tool should work. You can read the full proposed implementation here but here are the significant parts:
 * Granular blocks (page, category, namespace, and file uploading) will be built on top of Special:Block. These blocks will function as if they were regular blocks and allow for the same options, but only take effect on specific pages.
 * We will add a new checkbox for "Block this user from the whole site" which will be checked by default. When it is unchecked the admin will be able to specify which pages, categories, and/or namespaces the user should be blocked from editing.
 * Granular blocks can be combined and/or overlap. (For example, a user could be simultaneously blocked from editing the articles Rain, Thunder, Lightning, and all pages inside the Category:Weather.)
 * Only one block is set at a time, to adjust what the user is blocked from the administrator would have to modify the existing block.
 * Block logs should display information about the granular block
 * When a blocked user attempts to edit an applicable page, they should see a block warning message which include information on their block (reason, expiration, what they are blocked from, etc.)
 * If a category is provided, the blocked user cannot edit either the category page itself and all pages within the category.
 * If the File: namespace is blocked, the user should not be allowed to upload files.

We like this direction because it builds on top of the existing block system, both a technical and usability wise. Before we get too far along with designs and development we'd like to hear from you about our prosposal:


 * 1) What do you think of the proposed implementation?
 * 2) We believe this should be an expansion of Special:Block, but it has been suggested that this be a new special page. What are your thoughts?
 * 3) Should uploading files be combined with a File namespace block, or as a separate option? (For example, if combined, when a user is blocked from the File namespace, they would neither be able to edit any existing pages in the File namespace nor upload new files.)
 * 4) Should there be a maximum number of things to be blocked from? Or should we leave it up to admin discretion?

We appreciate your feedback on this project's talk page or by email. For the Anti-Harassment Tools team, SPoore (WMF) (talk), Trust and Safety Specialist, Community health initiative (talk) 20:54, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

My poem is bad but my apology for the bad links is sincere!
Rosa Red Chateau01.jpg are red,

Good message links are blue,

My proofreading stinks,

So here's a good link for you SPoore (WMF), Trust &#38; Safety, Community health initiative (talk) 16:34, 10 May 2018 (UTC)]].

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!
Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

Nathan Kress
You just accepted a vandalic edit. The user directly is saying that Kress deserves to voice Bumblebee in any Transformers-related work, not that Kress will do it. If you are not sure about the edits, just let another person review them. (CC) Tb hotch ™ 17:06, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

February 2022
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Julia Chan. That IMDb is WP:NOTRS for WP:BLP bio info is rather basic, and an experienced editor should know this. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 22:21, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

File:totally spies logo.jpg
I want this file kept as a memory from 2001 75.105.232.44 (talk) 15:04, 5 June 2024 (UTC)